HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2015, 6:49 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
I expect that cost to more or less equal out as the equipment costs will be lower in the beginning and higher in the end. But will get built.
Oh ya, it'll get built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2015, 6:58 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefourthtower View Post
http://cjme.com/story/video-pa-mayor...-regina/528700

VIDEO: P.A. mayor takes shots at Saskatoon, Regina


Dionne takes jab at Saskatoon's bridges, mayor Atchison's weight, Regina's bypass

Reported by Thia James

First Posted: Jan 30, 2015 7:32am | Last Updated: Jan 30, 2015 8:15am

Mayor Greg Dionne will not be attending the mayors' caucus at this year’s Saskatchewan Urban Municipalities Association (SUMA) convention in Saskatoon next week.

Prince Albert’s mayor made this announcement during his third State of the City address on Thursday, and in the midst of it, took a jab at Saskatoon Mayor Don Atchison, criticizing his weight, as he took a swipe at the Bridge City’s push for its new commuter bridges.

“You got nine other bridges, you can wait a couple more years, you whined about these ones for the last couple, that’s why the river level came up. But you know, you can walk a little and maybe the mayor there will lose some weight, if he didn’t have to walk out of his office. That’s why he’s heavier than me, because he walks out of his office 10 feet and he’s on a bridge,” Dionne said, drawing laughter and collective groans from the audience of about 350 in the Ches Leach Lounge
Ya, well, in the past, Atch has taken rhetorical/petty-minded shots at Regina; and this week, he publicly stated an unwarranted shot at Winnipeg.

What an @$$hole. Saskatoon deserves better.

Last edited by SkydivePilot; Jan 30, 2015 at 7:01 PM. Reason: "Saskatoon . . . . "
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2015, 7:19 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
Ya, well, in the past, Atch has taken rhetorical/petty-minded shots at Regina; and this week, he publicly stated an unwarranted shot at Winnipeg.

What an @$$hole. Saskatoon deserves better.
Haha,

Well in the last election the vote almost got Wolf in, and I would imagine that his reign as mayor will be over after the dust settles in the next one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2015, 10:49 PM
dsmmace dsmmace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
CJME News just stated that the Regina by-pass project will be affected by the drop in oil revenues. ( . . . but I'd bet that the price will start to rise within a year or so.)
Diesel prices hasn't fallen off enough to lower the costs of construction, there will be some losses from the gas tax for sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2015, 8:09 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmmace View Post
Diesel prices hasn't fallen off enough to lower the costs of construction, there will be some losses from the gas tax for sure.
Ya, no kidding; however, gasoline is starting to creep back up though. (Even though oil is still $45ish.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2015, 5:10 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
The farmyard at the SE corner of Pinky and TCH has been demolished as well as all the trees and other items. It is now a clean slate to start construction the large slip ramps for the new interchange.

I am curious to see if they will be single lane or two lane high speed ramps...?

https://www.google.ca/maps/@50.39514.../data=!3m1!1e3

Does anyone know if the farmyard near the Condie Reservoir has been leveled to make room for the new interchange there?

Last edited by North_Regina_Boy; Mar 2, 2015 at 5:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2015, 1:37 AM
dsmmace dsmmace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 423
I'll tell you in May when the project is awarded and we can actually talk openly about it again. There was another year added to the length of the project.

Sooo much aggregate used in this project, it really is amazing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2015, 3:26 AM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
So it's a good time to invest in Gravel pits?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Mar 3, 2015, 3:29 AM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmmace View Post
I'll tell you in May when the project is awarded and we can actually talk openly about it again. There was another year added to the length of the project.

Sooo much aggregate used in this project, it really is amazing.
I am very much looking forward to that announcement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2015, 4:17 AM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Money in the budget for the bypass. $211 million to start construction on the Regina Bypass, purchase land and facilitate utility moves

http://www.saskatchewan.ca/governmen...udget-highways
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2015, 4:59 AM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
Money in the budget for the bypass. $211 million to start construction on the Regina Bypass, purchase land and facilitate utility moves

http://www.saskatchewan.ca/governmen...udget-highways
That is roughly 1/6th the total for the project. Plus whatever the feds chip in this year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2015, 3:01 PM
Dan0myte Dan0myte is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 927
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
That is roughly 1/6th the total for the project. Plus whatever the feds chip in this year.
Yeah, $211m won't get anything built but it will clear the path for them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2015, 4:26 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan0myte View Post
Yeah, $211m won't get anything built but it will clear the path for them.
I suspect they will get started on the eastern interchanges at White City and Balgonie, as those are roughly $35M a piece, as well as start on the section of the west bypass north of Dewdney. As those two sections are to be completed early, maybe not 2017 but 2018.

The whole thing needs to (and will get built) but the East interchanges are a HIGH priority (Politically good move) as well as the west bypass for the GTH trucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2015, 11:06 PM
Treesplease Treesplease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 990
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
I suspect they will get started on the eastern interchanges at White City and Balgonie, as those are roughly $35M a piece, as well as start on the section of the west bypass north of Dewdney. As those two sections are to be completed early, maybe not 2017 but 2018.

The whole thing needs to (and will get built) but the East interchanges are a HIGH priority (Politically good move) as well as the west bypass for the GTH trucks.
The $211M should pay to move a bunch of dirt to get the ramps in place so they can sit and settle (whatever the geo tech term is?) the proper amount before any hard structures actually get built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2015, 2:14 AM
brithgob brithgob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Treesplease View Post
The $211M should pay to move a bunch of dirt to get the ramps in place so they can sit and settle (whatever the geo tech term is?) the proper amount before any hard structures actually get built.
And that takes a full year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2015, 2:08 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by brithgob View Post
And that takes a full year.
Yes it does, but at least it's a start.

The structure could go up for the Northbound bridge at the West Bypass and TCH as the dirt has been settling there for three years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2015, 3:52 PM
dsmmace dsmmace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 423
The dirt needs to sit for the paving to be completed, that rest period does not delay the actual bridge/overpass building, except to get to proper heights where the Pile and the abutment (pile cap) for the bridge crossing structure to rest on. Those sit on 60 ft deep/tall piles for example.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2015, 7:41 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsmmace View Post
The dirt needs to sit for the paving to be completed, that rest period does not delay the actual bridge/overpass building, except to get to proper heights where the Pile and the abutment (pile cap) for the bridge crossing structure to rest on. Those sit on 60 ft deep/tall piles for example.
That is good news. Mean they could start on the east structures I guess like always have to wait and see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 3:30 PM
TannerF TannerF is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 101
http://www.leaderpost.com/life/Counc...451/story.html

The province wants the City of Regina to pay 23.3 million or 35.4% of the cost of the 9th Ave North and Hill Ave interchanges on the West bypass. They also want the RM of Sherwood to pay for 14.8% of the cost.

Last edited by TannerF; Mar 23, 2015 at 3:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2015, 3:45 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by TannerF View Post
http://www.leaderpost.com/life/Counc...451/story.html

The province wants the City of Regina to pay 23.3 million or 35.4% of the cost of the 9th Ave North and Hill Ave interchanges on the West bypass. I didn't know that interchanges were planned for those two locations at this time.
I knew that the 9th Ave interchange was planned. However I always had hoped that Hill Ave would be an interchange at the start, last time I looked it was just a right turn only access. It would be a good idea to get all grade separations done right on the West side between Highway 1 and 11 this would included a service interchange at Armour Road as well.

Source of the bypass design currently (Page 8):

http://www.saskbuilds.ca/projects/Re...022%202014.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.