Quote:
Originally Posted by kenratboy
I have to ask, why are the transfer floors so difficult? Is it just the fact everything is changing, utilities, elevators, stairs, etc. are different, etc.? Is it basically a foundation in the sky?
|
Exactly. Instead of forces being transfered straight down the tower and into the bedrock via columns, they essentially have to be "rerouted" to a different column grid by way of a transfer floor. One way to think of it is exactly what you said: a foundation of a building sitting on top of another building. In the case of Trump, there are a bunch of different buildings stacked on top of each other. Each time, though, the forces need to be transfered from structural columns in one section to those in the next, again by way of a transfer floor. The presence of utilities, stairs, and elevators, as you suggest, make an already-complicated situation even more complicated.
There are many different reasons why engineers use transfer floors in their design: one of them, as Rocket1 mentioned, is to tie peripheral outrigger systems to the concrete core at specific points in the building. They normally use this on exceptionally tall buildings, especially when, as in Chicago, they will experience considerable lateral loads. Another reason might be that the structure changes uses midway up, going from an office building to condos, for example, and necessitating a change in the position of columns on each floor.