HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #861  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2007, 5:28 AM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
David Baker + Partners did an overhaul of their website and it includes a new spread for the Market Gateway Tower Proposed in Downtown San Jose.
The link (For all the renderings):
http://www.dbarchitect.com/project_d...2520Tower.html

The Sample:




Also Check out Dagget Place Proposed for San Francisco. Good infill for an area in transition.

http://www.dbarchitect.com/project_d...2520Place.html

Last edited by San Frangelino; Jun 23, 2007 at 5:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #862  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2007, 6:27 AM
rocketman_95046's Avatar
rocketman_95046 rocketman_95046 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SD/SJ, CA, USA
Posts: 1,879
^isnt that building under construction already in SJ? I thought i saw them pile driving that site when i was up there a couple months ago...
__________________
1,000 posts and still going...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #863  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2007, 3:26 PM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
You might be thinking of the http://www.360residences.com/ which is on the block directly north this project and has just started construction. This one according to the website is still in the design phase


As a sidenote....on the 360's website there is a virtual tour for the tower that shows how it will look on the tower as well as shows the site for the Market Gateway Tower. Its a tolerable video if you turn off the sound.

Last edited by San Frangelino; Jun 23, 2007 at 3:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #864  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2007, 3:52 PM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
I made this map awhile back ago to place the projects and proposals in San Jose. It's based on one that was done for Sacramento awhile back ago.



and here are most of the links to the projects:

1. Central Place- Under Construction
http://www.sjheartofthecity.com/block3_b.htm

2. City Heights- Nearly Complete
http://www.cityheightssj.com/

3. Axis- Under Construction
http://axissanjose.com/

4. 360 Tower- Under Construction
http://www.360residences.com/

5. City Front Square- Proposed/Approved
http://www.sjredevelopment.org/month...ts/housing.pdf

6. Park View Towers- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.tsgarch.com/

7. 99. W Santa Clara- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.hellermanus.com/portfolio...%22%24H6%5C%0A

8. 200 Park Avenue- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.mve-architects.com/page.cfm?pgid=7&catid=33&subcatid=36&pid=82


9. 1 S Market Street- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.amaa.com/portfolio/projec...Rmb2xpby8/IzE=

10. Market Gateway Tower- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.thecorecompanies.com/comm...regateway.html

11. First United Methodist Tower- Proposed/ Approved
http://www.saitowitz.com/

12. 8 E San Fernando St.- ?

13. Almaden Towers- ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #865  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2007, 11:16 PM
rocketman_95046's Avatar
rocketman_95046 rocketman_95046 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SD/SJ, CA, USA
Posts: 1,879
^Thanks for the info
__________________
1,000 posts and still going...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #866  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2007, 1:54 PM
roadwarrior's Avatar
roadwarrior roadwarrior is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 446
Would be nice for San Jose to annex Moffett Field and move their airport there, so that they would no longer have the height restrictions and the downtown wouldn't look so stumpy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #867  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2007, 4:50 PM
krudmonk's Avatar
krudmonk krudmonk is offline
Of Heart's Delight
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadwarrior View Post
Would be nice for San Jose to annex Moffett Field and move their airport there, so that they would no longer have the height restrictions and the downtown wouldn't look so stumpy.
With the $billions going into SJC and the NIMBYs in Sunnyvale/Mountain View, that will never happen. All we can hope for now is a spread-out skyline. A large, dense cluster would be fine even if they aren't scraping any bit of the sky. That might take away from the hills anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #868  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2007, 11:05 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Brandywine's downtown (Oakland) tower nears completion

Quote:
Brandywine's downtown tower nears completion

In less than four months, Brandywine Realty Trust is set to open Oakland's first new downtown office highrise in five years.

The nine-story tower at 2100 Franklin St. near 21st street is attached to an existing building at 2101 Webster St., which Brandywine bought four years ago.

The older building is utilitarian and clunky. While the new building is glassy, with floor-to-ceiling windows, and a curved wall wrapping around the combined building's entrance on 21st street. Inside the new wing, a central atrium will bring additional light to interior offices.

All that natural light, along with a special coating on the glass, special paint on the roof and improved air circulation are meant to help the building earn a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification. The certification would make Brandywine a LEED pioneer in the Oakland market.

Senior Vice President Dan Cushing said the company believes it can comfortably exceed its initial goals of base-level LEED certification and qualify for LEED silver, a higher standard. The building might even reach LEED gold, Cushing said.

Whatever environmental kudos it earns, the building will ultimately be judged by Brandywine on how quickly it attracts tenants. The company's Oakland portfolio, clustered around Lake Merritt, is only 3 percent vacant without the new building. Health care giant Kaiser holds roughly a quarter of that space.

Cushing said the company is out selling, but has no leases yet to announce. Most office tenants like to be able to walk around inside a completed building before signing a five- or 10-year lease.

jkdineen@bizjournals.com / (415) 288-4971 / rtate@bizjournals.com / (415) 288-4968
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...ml?t=printable
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #869  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2007, 11:13 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Developer's pitch revives talk of junking Cow Palace

Quote:
Developer's pitch revives talk of junking Cow Palace
San Francisco Business Times - June 29, 2007
by Eric Young

A recent proposal to replace the Cow Palace with housing and shops has revived a long-running debate over the future of the aged Daly City landmark.

A private development firm last week told the Cow Palace board it wants to raze the Cow Palace to build new housing and retail. Board members rejected the idea, but left the door open for the developer, Pro Sports Venture Capital, to come back with additional details about its proposal and its own financial standing.

It's not the first time the state-owned Cow Palace, opened in 1941, has caught the eye of developers with visions of new uses for the 67-acre site at Geneva Avenue and Carter Street. This latest proposal has revived a discussion of whether the venue should remain.

"When it was built 60 years ago, it was a different world," said Ivor Samson, a lawyer for Pro Sports Venture. "Now it's a valuable property in a densely populated area. Daly City needs things to support the population" like more housing, he said.

Some Daly City officials want to convert the venue.

"The Cow Palace is a white elephant," said Patricia Martel, the city manager of Daly City. "The uses of the Cow Palace, except for the Grand National (rodeo), are unwelcome in our community," she said, referring to events like the Exotic Erotic Ball and gun shows.


The hall has hosted all manner of events from political conventions to Liberace concerts and religious revivals.

The Cow Palace board defended the facility.

"We're not interested in selling the Cow Palace," said Henry Kuechler III, president of the nine-member board that oversees the venue on behalf of the state of California. The Cow Palace continues to do enough business to support itself, and its marquee event, the annual Grand National Rodeo and livestock show, "is a good service to the urban community," Kuechler said. "It's a valuable lesson to show some people that milk doesn't come from the bottle."

Still, some changes are coming to the Cow Palace grounds. Daly City's redevelopment agency is negotiating to lease 13 acres of the Cow Palace's parking lot to build housing and stores. It's not clear when those negotiations will conclude.

eyoung@bizjournals.com / (415) 288-4969
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranci...ml?t=printable
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #870  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2007, 10:40 AM
peanut gallery's Avatar
peanut gallery peanut gallery is offline
Only Mostly Dead
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marin
Posts: 5,234
I'd hate to see it go. I've made a lot of great memories in that place, including my very first rock concert. But I haven't been inside in years. Is it holding up or falling apart?
__________________
My other car is a Dakota Creek Advanced Multihull Design.

Tiburon Miami 1 Miami 2 Ye Olde San Francisco SF: Canyons, waterfront... SF: South FiDi SF: South Park
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #871  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2007, 1:14 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
July's approximate progress:

__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #872  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2007, 8:09 PM
rocketman_95046's Avatar
rocketman_95046 rocketman_95046 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SD/SJ, CA, USA
Posts: 1,879
Interest in downtown San Jose high-rise living shows in deposits


Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal - June 29, 2007by Sharon Simonson

Nearly 25 percent of the 124 condos in the first downtown San Jose condominium high-rise are in escrow with sales expected to close in the next two weeks.

Martin Menne, president of MCM Diversified, Barry Swenson's development partner on the City Heights project, says sales have gone better than anticipated and buyer interest had been good since they began marketing the project in November. The company has had permission from the state to actually close escrow on its units only since April 26.

"We have had a price increase already, and we are having good deal flow," Menne says. "There is good interest in downtown, and people are saying they want to be part of the area's renaissance."

New home builders generally are satisfied if they are selling between one and two homes a week in a subdivision. Based on eight weeks of sales time, City Heights is on target with that pace and offers a glimpse into the level of buyer enthusiasm for high-rise condos in the center city. City Heights is situated near downtown's northeast edge, adjacent to San Pedro Square. Its units start in the $300,000 range and rise to more than $1 million.

Another 20 or so high-rise housing projects are in various stages of execution in downtown. Interest in buyer reception has been strong, not only among developers but also the city of San Jose, which is pushing to bring residents to downtown as the necessary spark to jump-start the area's long-awaited rebirth.

Overall, San Jose home sales have slowed in the past two years from the frenzied pace of the national housing boom during 2004 and 2005, but the market remains reasonably healthy, particularly compared to troubled markets in places such as Florida. Thus far, Silicon Valley median home prices have continued to rise, buoyed by sales of houses priced at about $850,000 and up. Entry-level home sales rates have slackened substantially. The pace of home sales above $2 million also has tapered off.

Besides City Heights, three other high-rise condominium towers are under construction in downtown now. But, the only other one offering units for sale is Mesa Development at its 360 Residences. The $200 million luxury high-rise near South Market and East San Carlos streets is in the opening phase of construction; all units are to be delivered by June 2009, according to public record.

The state issued its approval to Mesa to allow the company to enter escrow with buyers only on May 1. Before May 1, Mesa accepted only buyer "reservations" and returnable deposits. Now Mesa can require buyers to hand over "hard money," or unreturnable deposits.

Charles Young, Mesa development director, declined to say how many of the 213 condos in the 23-story tower the company has sold. Mesa is seeking 3 percent to 5 percent deposits for its units, with deposits growing as the units become more desirable, he says. It is asking for 10 percent deposits on its six penthouses. On a $600,000 condo -- the cheapest in the building -- a 3 percent deposit is $18,000.

Mesa's marketing strategy differs markedly from the one employed at City Heights and the other developments now under construction. Neither Hollywood's CIM Group nor Spring Capital of Oregon have yet secured state approval to close sales in their downtown condo towers. Both developments are much farther along in their construction than is Mesa.

Young says Mesa's approach has been deliberate.

"In our mind, it takes some of the risk out of the deal because you know what the demand for your product is, and you're not waiting until the whole building is built," he says. "We wanted to set our financial goals and let the buyer ride the market with us."

Developers who wait until later in construction to sell probably won't have to spend as much money on marketing -- Mesa invested in an elaborate off-site sales office in lieu of having a building to show -- and they're betting that home prices are still rising. Selling later gives those gains to the developer, not the buyer, he says.

Of course, if housing values fall, the developer who waits also must absorbs the declines.

Michael Kriozere, whose Urban West Associates plans to begin construction at the beginning of 2008 on a two-tower condo project adjacent to San Jose's Fairmont Hotel, says he favors the Mesa method and has used it successfully in San Francisco. He plans to begin selling his units as soon as his construction starts with delivery expected 20 months to 24 months later.

California law allowing the earlier sales has only been in effect about a year, he says.

"If you can sell units before you finish a building, and people are moving in right away after it's done, the money you have invested in the building is outstanding a much shorter period of time," he says. "The interest is calculated on how long the money is out, and you can save a ton of money."

Meanwhile, a principal with San Jose's Northpoint Development says the company has secured up to $24 million from new financial partners to complete the initial work on three proposed condo high rises in downtown. Alex Erickson declined to identify the partners for the three projects. The sites are near St. James Park, San Jose State University and the new San Jose City Hall.
"This is the initial capitalization of our projects and will allow us to get entitlements," he says. "It is a huge step."

He hopes to begin construction next summer. He now begins his trek to gain construction financing, he says.
__________________
1,000 posts and still going...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #873  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 2:23 AM
San Frangelino's Avatar
San Frangelino San Frangelino is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 655
Nothing terribly groundbreaking, but I happened upon a flickr.com photo that showed this structure well under construction on Park Presidio and Clement St in the Richmond District.






Its a Beth Sholom Synagogue by http://www.saitowitz.com

I found it interesting that a structure like this made it into the architecturally conservative neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #874  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 3:45 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
^^^Are they getting away with that because it's a religious institution? I think it's wonderful, but no way do I think anybody could put something that radical in a San Francisco neighborhood if it were, say, a retail outlet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #875  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 4:49 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
Quote:
Lot next to AT&T Park is up for grabs
John King, Chronicle Urban Design Writer
Sunday, July 8, 2007
There's no telling when Major League Baseball's All-Star Game again will visit San Francisco. But here's a good bet: The 14-acre parking lot across China Basin from AT&T Park will be gone.

What might replace it, though, is as murky as the Giants' long-term game plan without Barry Bonds.

The land is owned by the Port of San Francisco, which sees a blank slate to be filled with buildings that spin off money to restore decrepit piers elsewhere on San Francisco Bay. Politically adept environmentalists imagine a vast new park or even wetlands.

And the Giants? Team officials just want to make sure there's ample parking no matter what vision wins out.

"Responsible planning dictates that there is dedicated parking as part of the area's overall transportation strategy," said Jack Bair, the team's general counsel. "Not all of our fan base can hop on Muni."

When the ballpark opened in 2000, the Giants were pioneers on the southern edge of central San Francisco. But now they're the centerpiece of an active part of the city -- and when the team's lease on the 2,000-space parking lot expires after the 2009 baseball season, the port acreage might be the only empty land in sight.

Most of the changes are connected to Mission Bay, a rapidly emerging redevelopment district already home to more than 1,600 housing units that stretch for two blocks beyond the ballpark's first-base line. Three upscale housing projects are rising from former lots next to the port land. There's a new UCSF campus and private research buildings.

That transformation is also obvious to port officials, who see their 14-acre rectangle as the culmination of everything taking shape around it.

"It's on the bay, it's at the channel, it's across from the ballpark. It has the opportunity to be a bit of an exclamation point," said Dan Hodapp, a senior port planner. "This piece of land is probably the most interesting location that Mission Bay has to offer."

The port controls 600 acres along the bay shoreline, including 39 piers and 43 inland parcels. But when the state handed off the port to the city in 1969, San Francisco also received a decrepit waterfront that has continued to deteriorate.

In recent decades some piers have been restored. Others have been torn down to open up views. Even so, the port last year estimated that it will cost $1.5 billion to bring its remaining property up to modern standards of accessibility and seismic safety.

Port planners estimate that if the Giants parking lot is leased to developers -- reserving land near the water to expand an existing bayside park -- it could bring $8 million in annual revenue that would be used to create waterfront open space and to preserve historic piers.

To this end, port planners have held several public meetings to study how the 14 acres might evolve. At the most recent, in late June, Hodapp unveiled scenarios that would allow high-density growth.

The scenarios include offices and condominiums, an 1,800-seat concert venue and streets that extend from Mission Bay. The scenarios also made room for one or two slender towers in the 25-story range -- roughly 100 feet above what's permitted nearby.

But minutes after Hodapp told the small crowd that "we're entering a new era of planning" and that towers could "make the site more noticeable," the reaction was as chilly as the waters of McCovey Cove.

Several audience members complained that the prior Mission Bay plan -- adopted in 1991 but never built -- reserved the entire site for a waterfront park. One speaker called for the wetlands debated back then; another chided port planners that "you need to celebrate the bay."

Giants executive Bair criticized plans to trim the public parking to a garage with at most 1,600 spaces -- spaces that also would be used by employees of the proposed half-million-plus square feet of office space.

Other speakers feared views of the bay would be lost. One protested that the scenarios didn't include bicycle lanes.

"That was one of our more difficult meetings," said Hodapp, who has scheduled a July 31 public meeting to review what sort of "vision and objectives" might be appropriate for the site.

Bair said the Giants hope to see "more of a public-oriented space" -- an approach that allows for at least 2,000 parking spaces but also includes shops, restaurants, a performing arts center of no more than 5,000 seats, and a large waterfront park.

And despite the cool response, environmentalists say there's room for an approach that everyone can live with.

"The port is looking at maximizing its revenue. The rest of us are looking at something that's been considered open space for the last 20 years," said Jennifer Clary, president of the environmental group San Francisco Tomorrow. "I don't think anybody really expects to see a 14-acre wetland."

Online resources:

For information on the Port's planning efforts:

links.sfgate.com/ZJV
Source: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg.../GIANTSLOT.TMP
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #876  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 5:02 AM
krudmonk's Avatar
krudmonk krudmonk is offline
Of Heart's Delight
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Frangelino View Post
I found it interesting that a structure like this made it into the architecturally conservative neighborhoods.
Yeah, that thing would look much better on the other side of the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #877  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 7:43 AM
Reminiscence's Avatar
Reminiscence Reminiscence is offline
Green Berniecrat
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond/Eureka, CA
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by San Frangelino View Post




I also think its nice that something like this is being thought of, but the structure itself looks like some sort of gigantic water tank; at least thats what the renderings remind me of. It does not look well with that neighborhood.
__________________
Reject the lesser evil and fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do!
-- Dr. Jill Stein, 2016 Green Party Presidential Candidate
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #878  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 4:53 PM
krudmonk's Avatar
krudmonk krudmonk is offline
Of Heart's Delight
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
Posts: 1,658
I hope that area is developed soon so the Warriors won't jump across the Bay. Oakland needs to hold on to at least one team.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #879  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 5:53 PM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,088
I think that synagogue is great where it is. It shocks you. I say good. Some of these neighborhoods need to have a surprise or two. But I was more interested in the process--how it got to be there in spite of what I'm sure was intense opposition by the neighbors. I seem to vaguely recall that churches/mosques/synagogues have some sort of "freedom of religion" exemption from zoning and other laws. Is that the case?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #880  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2007, 5:57 PM
roadwarrior's Avatar
roadwarrior roadwarrior is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTinSF View Post
^^^Are they getting away with that because it's a religious institution? I think it's wonderful, but no way do I think anybody could put something that radical in a San Francisco neighborhood if it were, say, a retail outlet.
Maybe true, but I personally like this type of development. It really breaks up the monotony of the Edwardians, Victorians, etc. I'm all for preserving history, but I'm also a modernist and I like it when SF creates such bold statements in its architecture. I just wish that there were more of these going up and not just near downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.