Censored uranium document called 'overzealous' reaction
By Angela Hall, Leader-Post April 1, 2009 9:01 PM Be the first to post a comment
REGINA -- The Saskatchewan Party government is being open as it considers nuclear options for the province, although someone may have been “overzealous” in blacking out information requested by a member of the public, says Enterprise and Innovation Minister Lyle Stewart.
With the government-appointed Uranium Development Partnership (UDP) poised to release a report at the end of the week on how Saskatchewan could further develop the uranium mined here, Stewart again faced criticism Wednesday from the NDP over the transparency of the process.
For the second day in a row, the Opposition produced information related to the uranium partnership that was received by a private citizen through an access to information request and questioned why it had been censored. One document was a request for proposals that the government issued as it was seeking a consultant to work with the UDP, with a number of lines — including a section on the project’s “deliverables” — blacked out.
“This is pretty fundamental information. This is not cabinet documentation. There’s no conflict with the private interests here. This document is simply a request for proposals,” said NDP Leader Lorne Calvert, who argued the public should be able to view the details.
Stewart told reporters he didn’t understand why certain information had been withheld either, and suggested it was the work of an “overzealous information officer” in government who fielded the access to information request.
“That’s the concern — the message that it sends to the public,” said Stewart.
“There are very specific reasons to black things out and I’m not interested in blacking anything out that doesn’t fall within those criteria and it absolutely sends the wrong message. We’ve been open as we can be about this whole process from start until now, and we will continue to be,” he said, adding he would ensure the documents are quickly reviewed.
However, Calvert said he still has questions about the objectivity of the 12-person UDP, noting three members are also board members of Bruce Power, the private company examining the possibility of building a reactor here.
Calvert insisted it’s not an “insult” to say there is a bias, but that it’s just the reality.
“If I’m selling vacuums, I have a bias towards vacuums,” he said.
But Stewart said it’s wrong to label the UDP as pro-nuclear. While the group includes the president of Bruce Power, Duncan Hawthorne, and businessmen from TransCanada and Cameco who are listed as board members of Bruce Power, it also includes First Nations, labour, municipal and university representatives, Stewart said.
“I think we balanced it pretty well. We wanted competent people there that would objectively look at the issue and offer us advice on what we should or should not proceed with.”
Stewart said total government funding to the UDP is less than $2.5 million. The bulk of the money will go to the consulting firm, McKinsey, he said.
The minister has said the panel was given the latitude to explore all aspects of the nuclear cycle, from mining to enrichment to a reactor to waste disposal, although he noted his government has already ruled out a nuclear disposal site in Saskatchewan because opinion polls say the people don't want it.
ahall@leaderpost.canwest.com
© Copyright (c) The Regina Leader-Post
Source
___________________________________
Nuclear power condemned
Two candidates for NDP leadership want motion defeated
By Luke Simcoe, The Star Phoenix April 1, 2009 Comments (4)
NDP leadership candidate Yens Pedersen speaks Tuesday at the Saskatoon Farmers' Market
Photograph by: SP Photo by Greg Pender, The Star Phoenix
Two provincial NDP leadership candidates are calling on their compatriots in the legislature to oppose a motion by the Saskatchewan Party supporting the development of nuclear power in the province.
Ryan Meili and Yens Pedersen released statements Tuesday condemning the possibility of a nuclear reactor on Saskatchewan soil.
The motion, proposed by Meadow Lake MLA Jeremy Harrison, will be debated in the legislature on Thursday.
Pedersen urged his party's 20 MLAs to vote against the motion, saying to do otherwise could alienate NDP voters.
"This is not some innocuous statement about considering options," he said. "It is a slanted and one-sided motion and supporting it could cause thousands of Saskatchewan people to consider supporting the Green party."
Both candidates expressed similar concerns about nuclear power, including the hazards of nuclear waste, the threat to the province's water supply and cost overruns associated with building and decommissioning reactors that increase the price of electricity for taxpayers.
They also accused the Sask. Party of trying to make nuclear power a foregone conclusion in Saskatchewan.
"The Wall government's uranium resolution falsely frames the debate on nuclear energy and uranium development," Meili said. "Nuclear power is being sold to us as a means to provide cheap energy, as a means of addressing immediate energy needs, even as a means of protecting our environment.
"But none of these sales pitches are based on the facts."
Although they're running against one another in the leadership race, Meili and Pedersen presented a united front in favour of alternative energy sources such as wind, solar and geothermal power.
"Whether it's Bruce Power or SaskPower, no one will build a nuclear reactor in Saskatchewan for less than 20 cents per kilowatt hour -- double the current price of electricity," Meili said. "When compared to wind power at 11 cents per kilowatt hour and electricity conservation at less than six cents per kilowatt hour, nuclear power's economics make no sense."
"You have to look at the track record of the industry, you have to look at the economic costs, the environmental and societal risks, and you have to weigh other options," said Pedersen. "When you do that, you see that renewable energy provides better economic development, more stable and long-lasting employment and cleaner, safer, simpler energy."
Nuclear power has been a divisive issue during the NDP's leadership race. Many candidates, including Meili and Pedersen, have voiced their opposition to nuclear development, while the acknowledged front-runner, Dwain Lingenfelter, previously supported a nuclear plant in northern Saskatchewan.
lsimcoe@sp.canwest.com
© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix
Source
____________________________
Gov't will consult with public on nuclear plans: Stewart
By Angela Hall, Saskatchewan News Network; Regina Leader-Post April 1, 2009
Public input will be a key factor in whether Saskatchewan embraces a nuclear power plant or other involvement in the nuclear cycle, Enterprise and Innovation Minister Lyle Stewart said Tuesday.
But the NDP Opposition charged the Saskatchewan Party government has already made up its mind, making the promised consultation process a "sham."
A report compiled by the government-appointed Uranium Development Partnership (UDP) is expected to be made public by the end of the week, along with details about a series of meetings that will wrap up before summer.
Even though the Saskatchewan Party campaigned on a promise to explore ways to add value to the uranium mined in the province, Stewart said the government won't do anything that "people are dead set against."
"I can honestly tell the people of Saskatchewan that we are committed to only developing the nuclear cycle in a fashion that meets with the approval of the majority of Saskatchewan people," said Stewart, adding that public response will be compiled in a report to government.
But NDP Leader Lorne Calvert questioned the government's intentions, noting a recent government action plan states Enterprise Saskatchewan will this year "advance recommendations of the Uranium Development Partnership report after public consultation to increase value-added processing of Saskatchewan's uranium resources."
Calvert said if the government has already decided to proceed, the public consultation is just an exercise in public relations. "It sounds to me as (if) they might as well take out a news release before it even starts and say, 'This public consultation process is a sham.' We've already decided, according to their plan. We're going ahead full speed," Calvert said.
But Stewart denied public input will be ignored.
"That's clearly the next step in this process and the public consultations will have a strong bearing on anything this government does in relation to the recommendations of the UDP," he said.
The Opposition also filed a freedom of information request to obtain a copy of the letter the government sent to the 12 members of the uranium partnership last fall when it was formed. Part of the letter was blacked out, although the government later revealed the censored portion was an innocuous statement explaining the report would go to cabinet and form the basis for public consultation.
"Paranoia reigns supreme in this government," said Calvert, arguing the unnecessarily blacked-out portion further adds to a lack of openness on the nuclear file.
© Copyright (c) The StarPhoenix
Source