Just to reinterate my sentiments from the Edmonton forum:
We need less "bulk" and "mass" and more "slenderness" and of course "HEIGHT", ENOUGH WITH THE STUMPIES ALREADY !
I don't have a problem with any of the three shown, I would say they're all fairly pleasing - just need some, any, all, ONE to sprout up a bit, no, a lot!
BTW - I'm expecting something fine from Oxford, if I was a betting man I would put it all on them in terms of proceeding with a tower.