Quote:
Originally Posted by fizzle
The reason they give for it being bad is dumb, granted, but a 14 storey building at that corner is going to look really out of place and sort of ridiculous. Last I remember, there aren't even sidewalks around that area. Maybe it's changed?
People are sort of shooting down the residents complaints without giving it SOME thought. That whole area is subdivision heaven, and there's lots of room. And all of a sudden someone is going to prop up a condo building in the middle of nowhere (relatively speaking) which will look out of place and IS out of place in that part of Hamilton. The height is the issue - I'd have no sympathy for them if they were crapping on some other type of residential improvement (townhouses spring to mind as something homeowners in that area like to dump on for the same property value affecting reasons), but this seems a little bit of an odd decision in that location.
|
I apologize for not giving it some thought. You’re right that I didn’t really. Just like the suburbanites think “density means lower property values” automatically, I tend to think “density is good” automatically, when it isn’t ALWAYS the case. Point taken.
The area is suburb hell, but that’s no reason to keep it that way. And even if there’s a lot of room, it will eventually run out. If a developer is willing to add density and height, I think that’s a good thing. I don’t understand the economics of it, and would not have guessed that that kind of height is necessary in the middle of nowhere, but if the developer sees demand, that’s good.
14 stories is tall, but it’s not that tall. It’s not tall enough to disrupt flight plans of an airport that is seven kilometres away; not tall enough to shade properties hundreds of meters away. It’s a good mid-rise height for a building (maybe a tall mid-rise), which seems appropriate for the intersection of two important roadways.
I don't think that the residents’ complaints are not mostly to do with the height, but rather property values. They would have opposed townhomes as well. One said something to the effect that she had worked hard to escape a poor neighbourhood; another said that he didn’t understand who would want to live in an apartment in the area, so assumed it would become “low income, or worse, welfare housing.” It’s possible that it is a little on the tall side for the area, but now that the height is reduced due to NIMBY complaints we’ll see that the NIMBYs really just don’t want any risk of poor people living nearby, and poor people are to their mind the only types interested in living in dense non-car-dependent neighbourhoods.