HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


    Mandarin Oriental Tower Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 8:16 PM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,290
Isn't the rendering above just a cropped version of the exact same rendering you posted on page 2, Steely?



The article says the hotel's design is supposed to reflect the mandarin group's oriental heritage. I don't get why they would settle for an old design meant for an entirely different client... and that has no oriental style at all. I suppose they could mean just the interior will have oriental detailing?
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346

Last edited by Pandemonious; Jun 28, 2005 at 8:25 PM.
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 8:27 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,294
^ could be, but it looks like the horizontal emphasis is gone, or maybe that's due to the poor image quality caused by the compression, which reinforces my point of not geting too far ahead of ourselves in rendering judgements of a given project from postage stamp size images.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 8:30 PM
Chase Unperson's Avatar
Chase Unperson Chase Unperson is offline
Freakbirthed
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Papa Songs.
Posts: 4,329
It does look very very similar. Just check out the clouds. I think it is the same picture.
__________________
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 9:01 PM
rds989's Avatar
rds989 rds989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 374
Very definitely same picture. Same clouds, same everything.

I dunno. I really liked this design back when I thought it had zero chance of ever being built. I still like it. I do think, however, that the vertical lines showing white in the rendering will be white painted concrete, just like the Heritage (key will be how the non-white horizontal lines are articulated -- gotta do better than the dark grey-green paint on the Heritage).

That area by Aon, 2-Pru, and the fitness center is Po-Mo Hell right now, with dumb little dated decorative elements cluttering up the place (all those maroon squares surrounded by black diamonds or circles and those peaked glass promenades). This design at least has clean lines and will clear up the visuals of the area.
__________________
rds989
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 9:08 PM
Xeelee's Avatar
Xeelee Xeelee is offline
Baryonic Lord
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemonious
Yep.



645 W Madison

SCB has a lot of solid designs. I am even more excited about this project now.
I would hardly call a box a solid design. But good for your town.
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 9:48 PM
chickenbone chickenbone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ipanema --> Greenland
Posts: 25
If that image is not an official rendering, then hopefully they are still tinkering with it and come up with something more exciting.

However, that image is definitely large enough to get an idea of what the building will look like. I wasn't the first one to notice that it looks like they're re-using old ideas.

I'm just crossing my fingers that the Calatrava and Studio Gang buildings can put Chicago back in the forefront of cutting edge architecture.

And btw: 5, 12, 23, 29, 36, & 42.
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 10:04 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by chickenbone
However, that image is definitely large enough to get an idea of what the building will look like.
i fully disagree. if you had studied your mies, you'd know that "god is in the details".

and thanks for the numbers tip. i'm gonna buy a boat so i can race against tom
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 10:11 PM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,347
Yeah. . . looks like the same rendering now that you mention it. . . they must have been bluffing back a few years ago. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2005, 11:59 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,460
I know that it looks like the same imaage, and i'm pretty sure that it is, but that's what's on the Mandarin Oriental website. Go figure...
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2005, 2:38 AM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeelee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemonious
Yep.



645 W Madison

SCB has a lot of solid designs. I am even more excited about this project now.
I would hardly call a box a solid design. But good for your town.
I was referring mainly to the post I made before that one, where I mentioned The Heritage, 340 On The Park, 1255 S Michigan.. which I do consider to be solid designs by SCB. I definitely wouldn't discredit a design based simply on the fact that it is a box, but to each his own. We have a lot of boxes here in Chicago that I think the above image puts to shame.

Back to the point of this thread... I do like the horizontal effect of the design posted on the Mandarin Oriental site, and think it would contrast nicely with the strict verticals of AON Center and Two Prudential Plaza in that respect. I am assuming they will be tweaking the design to fit the program of this development, which I am sure is different than that of the Park Boulevard Tower.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2005, 4:00 AM
2PRUROCKS!'s Avatar
2PRUROCKS! 2PRUROCKS! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 522
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1
I just spoke with John Lahey, who is Presigent of Solomon Cordwell Buenz. I was expecting to leave a voice mail, but hey, what can I say. At this time a rendering is not avaliable I was told that they are still in the early design phase, and it would be 1-2 months before something might be presentable.


He mentioned that the programming for the Mandarin Oriental was a bit different than what they expected, so some things are being worked on.
Based on this info and the fact that rendering is the same as the previous dead proposal I believe this rendering represents very little other than relative height of what MO will actually look like. This old renering seems like it eventually morphed into Heritage and 340 E. R. It don't think SCB would use the same proposal for the MO especially since the programing is different. They just probably wanted to have a pic for the website before they had an actual rendering to put on there.
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2005, 6:10 AM
HK Chicago HK Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 987
SCB has given us many nice B tower designs, but I think 340 OTP will be an A and be their breakthrough work.

I've always liked the Park Boulevard design, mostly for the NE corner. As I stated before, I fully believe 340 OTP is derived and refined from the Park Boulevard design, so a fully realized Park Boulevard design should also be an A tower. I hope this is it.
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2005, 12:58 AM
detroitismylove detroitismylove is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit Rock City
Posts: 317
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeelee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pandemonious
Yep.



645 W Madison

SCB has a lot of solid designs. I am even more excited about this project now.
I would hardly call a box a solid design. But good for your town.
This design reminds me of the One Kennedy building currently under construction in Detroit:

     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2005, 2:02 AM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is online now
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 30,294
^ i guess the overall boxy forms combined with the single offset spire make the two designs vaguely reminiscent of eachother but the chicago building would stand over 3 times taller, if it's built.
__________________
"Missing middle" housing can be a great middle ground for many middle class families.
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2005, 2:33 AM
beachdoc06 beachdoc06 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 41
Can we expect any news about the new design before the end of the year?
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2005, 9:37 PM
Michi's Avatar
Michi Michi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Downtown Houston
Posts: 8,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan
^ i guess the overall boxy forms combined with the single offset spire make the two designs vaguely reminiscent of eachother but the chicago building would stand over 3 times taller, if it's built.
lol...nothing new there.

Chicago's loop value must be in an endless skyrocket, shooting for the stars.
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2005, 2:32 AM
Tom In Chicago's Avatar
Tom In Chicago Tom In Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sick City
Posts: 7,347
^It's actually one of the more reasonably priced places anywhere in the country. . . despite it's regional dominance. . .
__________________
Tom in Chicago
. . .
Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky.
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2005, 4:45 AM
Jasonhouse Jasonhouse is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 23,744
One thing seems clear... Expect a decorative pole.

Which means, expect the final official hieght to be taller IMO.
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2005, 4:49 AM
Chase Unperson's Avatar
Chase Unperson Chase Unperson is offline
Freakbirthed
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Papa Songs.
Posts: 4,329
^IMO, 90 floors is a lot of floors no matter what the official height is and would be a legitimately very tall building no matter what.
__________________
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2005, 11:20 PM
budman budman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 487
I am new to this thread, and was curious about the opinions and information on the Mandarin's residential section. I recently purchased a unit in Waterview Tower, so I may be biased. But I have lived in downtown Chicago for 15 years, and I can tell you that, as an actual purchaser of a condo in a building like Waterview Tower (certainly a competitor of the Mandarin residences), I would NOT consider purchasing in the Mandarin because of the lack of views alone. Additionally, there is no after dusk foot traffic and, at least for the last 15 years, has not been a nightlife destination, and has no neighborhood feel whatsoever). Perhaps that will change after the Mandarin and other residences are built. The location may make sense for the owners of the hotel, but it is not obvious that it makes sense for someone who might be living there permanently (the access to the pedway and McCormick place are not selling points to the potential purchaser of a condo at the expected prices - I want a great view, great style, convenience and amenities. Mandarin appears to have some, but not all, of these qualities, and I chose Waterview over Mandarin for that reason). Obviously, different people buy different houses for different reasons, but without great views, it will be tough to sell those residences when your competition (like TTC and Waterview) has everything you have PLUS killer views.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.