HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


    Oceanwide Center I in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #881  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 2:08 AM
Skyy's Avatar
Skyy Skyy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 145
From today. Crane assembling quickly:



__________________
Photographer and writer for Chicago YIMBY
My Instagram
     
     
  #882  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 2:47 AM
matt19215 matt19215 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyy View Post
From today. Crane assembling quickly:



which of the towers is this?
     
     
  #883  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 3:53 AM
viewguysf's Avatar
viewguysf viewguysf is offline
Surrounded by Nature
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, California
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt19215 View Post
which of the towers is this?
The top one with the new crane is the taller First Street side; the bottom one coming above ground is on Mission Street.
     
     
  #884  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 4:51 PM
slock slock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 383
I talked to a worker and they said that for the Mission Street Tower, they’re about to start moving to a floor every three days.
     
     
  #885  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 5:23 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,166
That's very exciting news. 2 floors/week would be awesome to achieve
     
     
  #886  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 6:04 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
That's very exciting news. 2 floors/week would be awesome to achieve
I’d expect it to move about as rapidly as 706 Mission, which most of us agree has been pretty rapid, one it gets above ground. That other Mission tower seemed to take forever in the foundation stage as well.
     
     
  #887  
Old Posted Aug 26, 2019, 6:54 PM
Skyy's Avatar
Skyy Skyy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 145
Good stuff!
__________________
Photographer and writer for Chicago YIMBY
My Instagram
     
     
  #888  
Old Posted Aug 27, 2019, 1:36 AM
SFguy415 SFguy415 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 9
Wonder how the second tower crane will be removed? It is positioned inside the building and latices boom trucks will not be able to reach that high?
     
     
  #889  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2019, 10:40 PM
david_h david_h is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 92
It's a big crane...

     
     
  #890  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 4:16 AM
Jerry of San Fran's Avatar
Jerry of San Fran Jerry of San Fran is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,553
8/29/2019

Surprised to see a lot of open space to take a photo today!

Oceanwide development 08/29/2019 by Apollo's Light, on Flickr
__________________
(Essex) Fox Plaza 52nd year resident in 2023 - (the building everyone loves to hate :------>))
     
     
  #891  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2019, 1:48 PM
SoCal Alan SoCal Alan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by david_h View Post
It's a big crane...
Great picture. Your office? If so, can we have pictures more often?
     
     
  #892  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2019, 7:07 AM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
     
     
  #893  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2019, 8:01 AM
timbad timbad is offline
heavy user of walkability
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mission Bay, San Francisco
Posts: 3,150
similar to previous:



     
     
  #894  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2019, 5:09 PM
Smashing Alligator Smashing Alligator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 24
9/17/2019

Tuesday, September 17 at around 9:45am. It appears that construction has completely stopped on this site. Cranes are idle and not a single construction worker on site besides a couple guys cleaning up the upper deck. Does anybody know if funding sources have pulled out?

     
     
  #895  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 3:25 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
The first sign of catastrophe of Tariff Man?
     
     
  #896  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 8:05 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt_climber13 View Post
The first sign of catastrophe of Tariff Man?
Not to get into a political debate about the need to confront China (concerning which our esteemed Congresswoman Ms Pelosi expressed agreement just yesterday on CNBC), there appears to be a lot going on with China Oceanwide besides tariffs that could effect this project in many ways:

Quote:
Genworth delays China Oceanwide merger to explore sale of Canada business
3rd July 2019 - Author: Matt Sheehan

Mortgage insurer Genworth Financial has announced a five-month extension to its planned merger agreement with China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd., which will give it time to explore the sale of its Canadian business, Genworth MI Canada Inc.

MergerOceanwide, which had been set to acquire Genworth by June 30, 2019, gave its consent for Genworth to solicit interest in a potential disposition of the business, with a new merger deadline set for November 30.

The parties have decided to consider strategic alternatives for MI Canada due to a lack of progress in discussion on the transaction with Canadian regulators.

A potential disposition may be the best option given the absence of “any substantive guidance or likely timeframe for the completion of their review,” the companies said.

Once Genworth identifies a suitable transaction for MI Canada, Oceanwide will have the right to accept or reject the terms of the MI Canada transaction.

If accepted, the parties will seek to close the sale of MI Canada as promptly as possible, and the acquisition of Genworth Financial promptly thereafter.

However, if Oceanwide rejects the transaction, both parties will have the right to terminate their planned merger agreement.

“MI Canada is one of our top-performing businesses,” said Tom McInerney, President and CEO of Genworth. “However, the lack of transparent feedback or guidance from Canadian regulators about their review left us no choice but to look at strategic alternatives for MI Canada that would eliminate the need for Canadian regulatory approval of the Oceanwide transaction.”

“Another potential benefit of selling all or a portion of MI Canada would be the opportunity to use the proceeds to satisfy future debt maturities,” McInerney explained.

“The transaction with Oceanwide has taken longer than any of us anticipated and we owe it to our stockholders to close it as soon as possible,” he added. “However, an additional extension may be required to complete the potential disposition of MI Canada.”

“In the meantime, we are in discussions with other regulators about the disposition of MI Canada and its impact on the overall Oceanwide transaction.”

LU Zhiqiang, Chairman of Oceanwide, also commented: “Oceanwide remains committed to the transaction at the original purchase price of $5.43 per share. We also remain committed to the $1.5 billion contribution to Genworth, following the consummation of the transaction.

“We look forward to closing the transaction as soon as possible so that we can bring certainty to Genworth stockholders and begin to realize the benefits of our merger.”
https://www.reinsurancene.ws/genwort...nada-business/

and most recently

Quote:
Genworth Financial Announces Date of 2019 Annual Stockholders Meeting
RICHMOND, Va., Sept. 12, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Genworth Financial, Inc. (NYSE: GNW) today announced it will hold its 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 12, 2019, if its proposed merger with China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co., Ltd. (Oceanwide) has not yet been completed. Genworth has scheduled its 2019 Annual Meeting to ensure that it remains in compliance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, which require each listed issuer to hold an annual meeting of stockholders during each calendar year.

In the event the proposed merger is not completed by December 12, 2019, the 2019 Annual Meeting will be held at 3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time at The Westin Richmond, 6631 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23230. Holders of record of Genworth's Class A common stock on October 18, 2019, will be eligible to vote at the 2019 Annual Meeting. In the event the proposed merger is completed by December 12, 2019, the 2019 Annual Meeting will not be held . . . .
http://newsroom.genworth.com/2019-09...olders-Meeting

For those who don't know, Genworth is the former (and much troubled) insurance arm of General Electric. China Oceanwide, the developer of Oceanwide Center has agreed to buy what's remaining of it, after it divests the Canadian subsidiary, for $2.7 billion but, as the above indicates, Canadian insurance regulators seem to be holding up the deal (and perhaps with good cause--Genworth wrote all sorts of Long-term Care policies that were apparently underpriced and are now causing it plenty of woe so that they may be concerned about the financial shenanigans or who gets what and where the LTC liabilities end up).

The relevance of all this is that what cash China Oceanwide Holdings has available and for what uses at any moment in time is a giant questionmark. We can hope their wheeling and dealing doesn't cause a shortfall in what's needed for thsee projects. But if not, it's about a whole lot more than tariffs.
     
     
  #897  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 4:51 PM
Smashing Alligator Smashing Alligator is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 24
Wednesday, September 18 at around 9:45am: No workers at all on site today for the second day and all gates are locked up. It's pretty clear now that the project is on hold.
     
     
  #898  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 5:54 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smashing Alligator View Post
Wednesday, September 18 at around 9:45am: No workers at all on site today for the second day and all gates are locked up. It's pretty clear now that the project is on hold.
Was it ever not on hold? If so then Deja Vu, amirite?
     
     
  #899  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 6:56 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,166
Sigh... I hope not. It was JUST about to rise too
     
     
  #900  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2019, 11:53 PM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 363
I saw one worker in the distance today but yeah, it looks frozen. Work across the street and didn't see the crane move today.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:14 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.