HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1201  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 4:47 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Rock blasting though...
But yea, if Route 7 were twinned, I’d definitely stop by SJ too, instead of driving straight from Freddy to Moncton (then Halifax).
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1202  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 4:49 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas View Post
Admittedly it is my gut feel; but to me it feels like Route 7 should be fully twinned. Two major (in the Maritime sense) cities that are that close together and DON'T have a direct fully highway route linking them together doesn't seem right. Were the route in place I do expect it would quickly grow teh traffic numbers to really make it worthwhile if it wasn't close already
We call that induced demand.

However, the traffic numbers really don't support it and statistically speaking I believe the highway is quite safe. It would be a colossal waste of money for practically no gain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1203  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 4:52 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Rock blasting though...
But yea, if Route 7 were twinned, I’d definitely stop by SJ too, instead of driving straight from Freddy to Moncton (then Halifax).
I don't quite get this. Having to travel ~55 km on a two lane road with not a lot of traffic prevents you from going to SJ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1204  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 4:53 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverD View Post
We call that induced demand.

However, the traffic numbers really don't support it and statistically speaking I believe the highway is quite safe. It would be a colossal waste of money for practically no gain.
Assuming that we leave the section through CFB as is, I wonder if anyone entertains the idea of turning Oromocto and Geary into bedroom communities of Fredericton, and Welsford into that of SJ.

Quote:
I don't quite get this. Having to travel ~55 km on a two lane road with not a lot of traffic prevents you from going to SJ?
Good question. On paper I might not like it, but in practice I might be okay, as long as there are no slow cars in front me preventing me from doing 120 km/h.

That’s just me though. Not every ontarian driver is like this. JHikka can confirm (the last half).

I was planning to check out SJ too the 2nd time I drove to Halifax, but then due to time and budget constraint, my friend who was travelling with me cut it out. We didn’t bother with P.E.I. either (though I already went the first time I checked out Atlantic Canada).
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1205  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 5:07 PM
Franco401 Franco401 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 1,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Assuming that we leave the section through CFB as is, I wonder if anyone entertains the idea of turning Oromocto and Geary into bedroom communities of Fredericton, and Welsford into that of SJ.
Absolutely not. Runaway sprawl has already become completely ridiculous south of Fredericton, and all the growth we're seeing in the city would be completely jeopardized.

We also need to remember the scale of this. These places are really far away, and it only makes sense if we're intentionally trying to emulate the worst development patterns of the last 50 years. No way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1206  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 5:15 PM
Taeolas Taeolas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 3,977
Eyeballing the map, the better solution might be to twin the 7 to Geary and from Welsford to SJ eventually.... And then look into upgrading/twinning the 101.

That route doesn't go into the Base lands and does visit villages along the way for the cost of a slightly longer route. (7km longer according to google maps)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1207  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 5:16 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Good question. On paper I might not like it, but in practice I might be okay, as long as there are no slow cars in front me preventing me from doing 120 km/h.
There are quite a few places to pass, including a few dedicated passing lanes on uphill portions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1208  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 7:03 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverD View Post
However, the traffic numbers really don't support it and statistically speaking I believe the highway is quite safe. It would be a colossal waste of money for practically no gain.
Agreed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue
That’s just me though. Not every ontarian driver is like this. JHikka can confirm (the last half).
I'm from SJ so if i'm driving out east it's very likely i'm driving to SJ anyway. It makes zero sense for me to drive from Fredericton to Sussex, cut through Route 10, and then take the twinned Route 1 from Sussex to SJ. There's nothing bad and scary about a non-twinned highway (Ontario has plenty of them, Quebec has them too), and it seems very odd to me that people decide to go places dependent on whether or not they have twinned highways.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas View Post
Eyeballing the map, the better solution might be to twin the 7 to Geary and from Welsford to SJ eventually.... And then look into upgrading/twinning the 101.
Twinning from Oromocto to Geary is the only acceptable upgrades I can see on this route in the near future. If anything, an improved 7/TCH interchange would be nice.

Don't think the 101 has the traffic or growth to warrant any considerable upgrades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1209  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 7:07 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Oh I actually meant the speeding part, oops. Of course path of least resistance.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1210  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 7:09 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Oh I actually meant the speeding part, oops. Of course path of least resistance.
I won't publicly admit how fast I drive on NB's very well-engineered and very sparsely used highways.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1211  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 7:26 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
I won't publicly admit how fast I drive on NB's very well-engineered and very sparsely used highways.
Alright then I feel less guilty doing 20% over the speed limit too. FrAnKs mentioned something similar for his video on N.B.-2 on youtube as well.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1212  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 7:31 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
and it seems very odd to me that people decide to go places dependent on whether or not they have twinned highways.
I often seek out two lane highways. If I'm driving to Montreal, chances are I cross into the US at Vanceboro, take route 6 to I95, then cut across Maine on various backroads and cross into Quebec at Coburn Gore. The only time spent on divided highways is about 10 min on I95 and then the stretch from Sherbrooke to Montreal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1213  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2020, 11:46 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverD View Post
I often seek out two lane highways. If I'm driving to Montreal, chances are I cross into the US at Vanceboro, take route 6 to I95, then cut across Maine on various backroads and cross into Quebec at Coburn Gore. The only time spent on divided highways is about 10 min on I95 and then the stretch from Sherbrooke to Montreal.
It's not uncommon for me on the drive from Toronto to London to only touch the 401 from highway 6 to old highway 97, approximately 30km worth. Even driving the work truck (tractor trailer), I like getting off at Drumbo and going in to east London on the back roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1214  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 6:13 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
N.S.-104 Twinning Contract Awarded

“Dexter Nova Alliance was selected from a short list of three firms.”

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-...ance-1.5446635
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1215  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 1:19 PM
Mattyyy Mattyyy is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 336
I was under the impression they were not building any bridges for the remaining twinning work to be completed. I drove the 11 yesterday and crews were hard at work on the early stages of bridge construction over the first river crossing (not sure of the name of the river). I assume this may be the only one they are doing but nice to see at least one bridge under construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1216  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 1:32 PM
josh_cat_eyes's Avatar
josh_cat_eyes josh_cat_eyes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyyy View Post
I was under the impression they were not building any bridges for the remaining twinning work to be completed. I drove the 11 yesterday and crews were hard at work on the early stages of bridge construction over the first river crossing (not sure of the name of the river). I assume this may be the only one they are doing but nice to see at least one bridge under construction.
The road beds leading up to that river crossing have already been built as well. On the Apple maps app, you can see what I mean. I’m happy that they will be building this.
__________________
We The People
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1217  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 4:29 PM
PEI highway guy PEI highway guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Summerside, PE
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyyy View Post
I was under the impression they were not building any bridges for the remaining twinning work to be completed. I drove the 11 yesterday and crews were hard at work on the early stages of bridge construction over the first river crossing (not sure of the name of the river). I assume this may be the only one they are doing but nice to see at least one bridge under construction.
I BELIEVE that is the Shediac river, by Chez Leos. That bridge is a short span. The Cocagne river is a much wider span, AKA, EXPENSIVE.

I still did not figure out when the tender was called for this work

Last edited by PEI highway guy; Feb 6, 2020 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1218  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2020, 10:13 PM
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 4,545
Interesting. My mother and my aunt both live in Shediac Bridge right by the highway and they are under the impression the bridge isn't getting twinned as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1219  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 12:20 AM
OUIR@random OUIR@random is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Nouveau-Brunswick
Posts: 760
Regarding the Route 11; The Shediac River Bridge will be build they are working on it as we speak, the Cocagne River Bridge will not. Simple.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1220  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 1:32 AM
PEI highway guy PEI highway guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Summerside, PE
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by OUIR@random View Post
Regarding the Route 11; The Shediac River Bridge will be build they are working on it as we speak, the Cocagne River Bridge will not. Simple.
Thank you. I think the confusion stems from the fact that when the Higgs government announced they would revive twinning 11 they said no new bridges would be built. Now we find out a bridge is being built. This does make sense to me as now the road will revert back to two lanes for only one bridge and not two, which will be much better for traffic flow.

Last edited by PEI highway guy; Feb 7, 2020 at 4:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.