HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2015, 11:35 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronos View Post
Plessis should be extended north to meet the CPT eastern extension, so that Lag, Plessis, and the east perimeter are the main north/south routes off the eastern section of the CPT. The intersection at Plessis and Gunn road will have to be updated as the lineups turning south on Plessis from Gunn is ever growing
Signals etc should be going in at Plessis/Gunn over the next year or two according to Russ Waytt June 15 2015 in his article in "the Hearald"

"The work on the intersection will be split up over 2015 and 2016, according to the Department of Public Works. This is largely due to design work needing to be done for the intersection upgrade and its proximity to the CPR rail mainline. Furthermore, the City must work with the railway to ensure that the future traffic signals at Plessis and Gunn will be interconnected to the busy rail crossing signals. According to our Public Works Department, the design work will be conducted in 2015 and construction in 2016 with new the turning lanes and traffic control signals."

Last edited by cllew; Oct 1, 2015 at 11:41 PM. Reason: add info from Russ Waytt in news article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2015, 12:09 AM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,992
did a little digging and the report on Concordia's twinning that I was thinking of was in 2008 not 2014/15 like I thought.

Anyway at that time the city reported there were 410-465 vehicles per lane per hour at peak hours and 600 and over per lane per hour at peak times is the number that would justify twinning Concordia. they also said the number of accidents is not out of line on comparable streets.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2015, 1:07 AM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
did a little digging and the report on Concordia's twinning that I was thinking of was in 2008 not 2014/15 like I thought.

Anyway at that time the city reported there were 410-465 vehicles per lane per hour at peak hours and 600 and over per lane per hour at peak times is the number that would justify twinning Concordia. they also said the number of accidents is not out of line on comparable streets.
What are the numbers on Munroe, Kimberly and McLeod? I think focusing just on the one street rather than how traffic flows through the whole area is pretty short-sighted when commuters are forced to use residential streets as arterial roads. Why not build the arterial road? Lagimodiere and CPT need better access, and CPT needs to be extended to the East ASAP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2015, 1:49 AM
Kronos's Avatar
Kronos Kronos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny D Oh View Post
Seems to me that Gunn/Plessis intersection would be an easy one to close. Gunn ends there and it's a road to nowhere. People can use Day to get to Regent or Springfield.
Gunn has a lot of traffic as it is the only exit off the east perimeter between Dugald Ave. and Lag.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2015, 3:57 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny D Oh View Post
Seems to me that Gunn/Plessis intersection would be an easy one to close. Gunn ends there and it's a road to nowhere. People can use Day to get to Regent or Springfield.
Huh? Gunn goes right to the east perimeter, there are also a lot of business's on Gunn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2015, 6:58 AM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Huh? Gunn goes right to the east perimeter, there are also a lot of business's on Gunn.
And there's access to Gunn from Day, Redonda and the Perimeter. There's not much actually on Gunn, most of the commercial business in that area is happening on Day or Redonda, or roads accessed from them. Both Day and Redonda can be easily accessed through Springfield Road too. Most of Gunn runs behind the bioreserve, open fields and backyards of Kildonan Meadows. If Plessis is going 4 lanes the whole way and hopefully connecting to CPT at some point, there's no need for an intersection with Gunn. The ice road truckers aren't heading west from their shop, they are heading right to the Perimeter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2015, 5:18 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny D Oh View Post
What are the numbers on Munroe, Kimberly and McLeod? I think focusing just on the one street rather than how traffic flows through the whole area is pretty short-sighted when commuters are forced to use residential streets as arterial roads. Why not build the arterial road? Lagimodiere and CPT need better access, and CPT needs to be extended to the East ASAP.
No numbers for those streets were quoted in that report and I don't think I have ever seen any numbers for those streets anywhere else.

I don't even recall ever driving over the axle count hoses on any of them either so maybe the city has never done counts on Kimberly or Munroe.

McLeod is a bit different as it gets higher traffic due to the Superstore and the Pallaser furniture plant feeding into it. Probably not as much since Pallaser downsized but still sends more down McLeod than to Munroe or Kimberly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 1:01 AM
Kronos's Avatar
Kronos Kronos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 104
Info regarding open house for the planned new Transcona Library.

http://https://twitter.com/cityofwinnipeg/status/659857806145662977
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 3:33 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronos View Post
Info regarding open house for the planned new Transcona Library.

http://https://twitter.com/cityofwinnipeg/status/659857806145662977
Why would they need a library in Transcona?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 1:47 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,785
^Ya. Everyone's so smart, they don't need books. Right?! haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:12 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Whatever the city ends up doing with the Transcona library, I hope they at least make it look somewhat like a respectable public building. Some of the newer public libraries are absolutely hideous abominations, like the Sir William Stephenson Library on Keewatin, replete with Burger King-style drive thru window (in case walking 30 feet from the attached parking lot is too much effort):



Source: now.winnipeg.ca

And then there is the strip mall piece of crap that is the Shindico Library on Henderson:



Let's step it up a notch. The 90s are over.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:22 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Kildonan
Posts: 2,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
Whatever the city ends up doing with the Transcona library, I hope they at least make it look somewhat like a respectable public building. Some of the newer public libraries are absolutely hideous abominations, like the Sir William Stephenson Library on Keewatin, replete with Burger King-style drive thru window (in case walking 30 feet from the attached parking lot is too much effort):



Source: now.winnipeg.ca

And then there is the strip mall piece of crap that is the Shindico Library on Henderson:



Let's step it up a notch. The 90s are over.
Well the Will Stephenson library was built in the 90's....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:25 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheswick View Post
Well the Will Stephenson library was built in the 90's....
Exactly. But does the city know this? Or are they going to keep going with the 90s style public-library-as-suburban-fast-food-restaurant design motif?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:28 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,892
The reason the Henderson Library looks like a grocery store on the outside is that is what is was before a library. The old location was a much small section of that same strip mall so it was actually an improvement.

My understand is the direction the city is going with new libraries is basically putting function ahead of style. That means they will lease a space on an existing bus route over some fancy design that could win architectural awards. Personally I am okay with that too as libraries are more about what is inside the walls than how pretty the walls are on the outside and if a compromise is needed I would rather it be one favouring content over building style.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:42 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Making libraries "architectural" is a waste of money. They are becoming a thing of the past anyway. A Butler building is suitable to house a library until the time that they all close.
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:45 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
My understand is the direction the city is going with new libraries is basically putting function ahead of style. That means they will lease a space on an existing bus route over some fancy design that could win architectural awards. Personally I am okay with that too as libraries are more about what is inside the walls than how pretty the walls are on the outside and if a compromise is needed I would rather it be one favouring content over building style.
Hmm. How do other places manage to pull off both form and function?

Waterloo YMCA and Library:



Church conversion in Quebec City:



Local library in Toronto:



Neighbourhood library in Quebec City:



Longueil:



Boucherville:



La Malbaie:



Scarborough:



Edmonton:



Bear in mind that none of these are, as far as I know, showpiece central libraries with huge budgets... they're just garden variety local ones.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:46 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
Making libraries "architectural" is a waste of money. They are becoming a thing of the past anyway. A Butler building is suitable to house a library until the time that they all close.
The cities I just posted examples from would seem to disagree with you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:51 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
What's your point? Did you not hear the news that the city is in very poor financial shape and is looking to raise its debt ceiling? And your answer is to spend more money on prettifying institutions that are outdated and redundant anyway?

Do you work for a buggy whip manufacturer?
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:53 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman View Post
What's your point? Did you not hear the news that the city is in very poor financial shape and is looking to raise its debt ceiling?
Fair enough. Then axe a surface parking lot from the library's budget and get people to park on the street, take the bus or use AT. There's a cost savings for the new library project right there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 2:58 PM
Riverman's Avatar
Riverman Riverman is offline
Fossil fuel & rubber
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ontario's feel good town
Posts: 4,029
Or lease space in a strip mall with parking included. You know, like the Henderson branch!
__________________
Get off my lawn.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:14 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.