NEW YORK | Goldman Sachs Headquarters | 749 FT / 228 M | 44 FLOORS - Page 23

BStyles · #**441** Posted **Dec 15, 2009, 5:37 PM**

A few lights out on the WFC roofs, but wow! Every building in that area has roof lights! And Goldman Sachs is ready to join!

OneWorldTradeCenter · #**442** Posted **Dec 15, 2009, 7:18 PM**

Isn´t this building finshed now. I mean, it has been topped put in 2008!?!

NYguy · #**443** Posted **Dec 17, 2009, 3:09 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneWorldTradeCenter

Isn´t this building finshed now. I mean, it has been topped put in 2008!?!

It's nearly finished. It will officially open next year, although Goldman has already been moving in (these things don't happen overnight).

pmarella

uaarkson · #**444** Posted **Dec 17, 2009, 5:36 AM**

What is that building on the far right? Is that in New Jersey?

gttx · #**445** Posted **Dec 17, 2009, 5:47 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by uaarkson

What is that building on the far right? Is that in New Jersey?

It took me a second to figure it out too, but it's for the tunnel. The angle just makes it look like a big building.

NYguy · #**446** Posted **Dec 17, 2009, 10:23 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by gttx

It took me a second to figure it out too, but it's for the tunnel. The angle just makes it look like a big building.

Yep, the Holland Tunnel.

NYguy · #**447** Posted **Dec 19, 2009, 2:33 PM**

A little older...

nilsn93

Dac150 · #**448** Posted **Dec 19, 2009, 3:52 PM**

Perfect fit.

BStyles · #**449** Posted **Dec 20, 2009, 9:58 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy

It's nearly finished. It will officially open next year, although Goldman has already been moving in (these things don't happen overnight).

pmarella

Notice how the buildings in Lower Manhattan go from low rise to high rise as you go further north. Libeskind was definitely looking out fot this when he proposed the ascending swirl for the WTC.

uaarkson · #**450** Posted **Dec 20, 2009, 10:15 PM**

Damn, this building is outrageously bright. It puts the New York Times building to shame.

JSsocal · #**451** Posted **Dec 20, 2009, 10:17 PM**

^^^Yeah, and if only Goldman had followed suit and been either a little shorter or a little taller, then the effect would have been even cooler.

Dac150 · #**452** Posted **Dec 20, 2009, 10:21 PM**

The massing is just right. Any taller it would look out of sorts, and any shorter it would look too stumpy.

NYguy · #**453** Posted **Dec 22, 2009, 3:04 PM**

kagoodmandds

NYC4Life · #**454** Posted **Dec 22, 2009, 7:19 PM**

No other location could have better suited this building, Great shots!

NYguy · #**455** Posted **Dec 28, 2009, 1:35 PM**

curbed

2-TOWERS · #**456** Posted **Dec 28, 2009, 11:49 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy

A little older...

nilsn93

this is one beautiful shot.. just think of this same shot in 3 yrs.... wow!!!!!!!!

NYguy · #**457** Posted **Dec 29, 2009, 1:47 AM**

abhishekontheweb

NYguy · #**458** Posted **Jan 1, 2010, 11:37 PM**

JANUARY 1, 2010

NYguy · #**459** Posted **Jan 5, 2010, 8:49 PM**

I think it's safe to move this one now.

Old Glory