Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinus
Its great that there is all this potential residential development on the cusp of fruition. However, the decline of our city centre retail is still occuring. It doesn't take a genius to realize as we approach a state of critical mass, there will be increasing demand for downtown retail shopping once again.
Currently we have two significant areas of mass retail; Portage Place Shopping Centre and CityPlace. The bones are there for significant retail development. But are both needed to accommodate the eventual demand for shopping in the city centre? Is only one of these locations needed? If so, which one should we keep? We cannot afford to lose two significant commercial retail shopping centre structures. The Bay would eventually rebound, but it's a question of how long are they willing to wait around for.
We are so bloody close to that tipping point. It's very frustrating to think about what we have and what we could lose to eventually meet the demand for what is developing.
|
I wouldn't be concerned... as downtown improves, retail always follows. If the market supports more residential, and it does (student or otherwise), then retail should naturally follow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LilZebra
I agree that the mall should be bulldozed. Bye bye Food Court. Save the clock, which is from the 19th century City Hall. Build regular street front retail (no cell phone stores!). Put a Harry Rosen or Tip Top, Polo Ralph Lauren, H&M. Discourage riff raff from hanging around "north Portage area" around former Portage Pl. mall. Constant Police walking patrols and / or Downtown BIZ Patrol.
Residential and offices. But make the residential condos. rather than apartments so to keep OUT the riff-raff.
|
I mostly agree. Such vendors would be beneficial to downtown. Security will be important, but I'm not as concerned as you.
Apartments or condos shouldn't bring in riff raff, because the cost to support the construction would put rents out of reach. If it's student housing, that's also good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ywgwalk
So you want to increase the number of people who live downtown/near Portage Place while at the same time remove any of the stores that they would actually utilize?
I'm looking forward to hearing what the plans are, but at the same time PP is a very useful (and quite busy whenever I'm there) mall for people that live downtown. Staples, Shoppers, Warehouse One, the various cell stores, etc, etc are all open evenings and weekends and are busier than what most people suggest on here.
|
Useful stores will remain, as every landlord likes a Shoppers and surely a Staples close to universities is smart. However a majority of the retail currently in place isn't relevant enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc
With $69 million going towards the sale of the property that leaves $231 Million left for development. With pads already in place much like 300 Main that is plenty of money to build 2 towers and redo the mall area.
300 Main was $130ish million for a 40 story building, I can't imagine the 2 Towers at PP costing much more then $150-$200? That leaves a minimum of $31 million to rework the mall. Granted my numbers are only slightly less then just guesses with sprinkles of factual numbers.
|
Nooooo 300 Main is way more than that. Dunno where you got that figure.
Not trying to be an ass, but it's a large project. Probably $200M or so. I mean, TNS with it's 2 smaller structures plus world beater plaza (lol) was over $400M, and 300 Main appears nicely spec'd.
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
Two towers dedicated to student housing seems like a lot, but I suppose it's the only option for developing the pads given that TNS has flooded the market with new office space. I suppose it's possible that there could be one student housing-oriented tower and perhaps another (the east pad?) dedicated to regular apartments, or possibly even a hotel?
|
I'm sure not all of it will be, but student housing is a great move. Hopefully it hints at a greater intent to attract more national and international students at u of w, who are more able to a) pay bigger rent and b) NEED the retail and amenities more than locals c) have more spending power for PP.