HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1541  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2019, 9:52 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigglysquishy View Post
Google Maps is now giving directions on the Bypass.
I doesn't show for me. Also doesn't show traffic on the new legs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1542  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2019, 9:57 PM
BrutallyDishonest2 BrutallyDishonest2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,426
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I doesn't show for me. Also doesn't show traffic on the new legs.
Probably not enough people on it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1543  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2019, 3:35 AM
Drofmab's Avatar
Drofmab Drofmab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 1,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
I doesn't show for me. Also doesn't show traffic on the new legs.
It’s essentially “pencilled-in” - many of the interchanges haven’t been included (just two roads crossing... no ramps, loops, etc), so there’s no way Google could route you onto the Bypass from Hwy6, for example.

Apple Maps has some of the interchanges... but in several cases, they don’t appear to actually connect to the Bypass. Likely old data that has been there during construction.

Google-owned Waze is more accurate (it allows crowdsourced updates to its maps), but still needs quite a bit of work before it’ll be useful for routing traffic accurately.

EDIT: Waze does route me to Saskatoon & Winnipeg via the Bypass (with an Albert Park starting point). Interestingly, none of the alternate routes suggested involve the “traditional” routing - via Lewvan (Stoon) or Ring Road/Vic Ave (Wpg).

EDIT2: my Garmin (no network connectivity) had an update waiting for it yesterday. After the update all of the Bypass interchanges appear... Garmin seems to have the most accurate/complete renders of the maps I’ve mentioned here... BUUUUT... I couldn’t force the device to route me via the Bypass, even when it was clearly the best option. Strangely, when you’re following a route, if you zoom out, the Bypass doesn’t show at all - all the other major & secondary roads do, though. Work to go with Garmin’s maps.
__________________
@drofmab

Last edited by Drofmab; Nov 9, 2019 at 2:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1544  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2019, 7:10 PM
pappcam pappcam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 607
Well, I drove the whole bypass both ways yesterday. It's a pretty cool work of engineering but I still think it's too far out of the city on the south end and quite a few km's could have been shaved off the route if it was closer to the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1545  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2019, 9:03 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by pappcam View Post
Well, I drove the whole bypass both ways yesterday. It's a pretty cool work of engineering but I still think it's too far out of the city on the south end and quite a few km's could have been shaved off the route if it was closer to the city.
Especially considering the likelihood of the city expanding south of the Ring Road in our lifetimes is pretty nil.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1546  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2019, 9:41 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
The reason the Bypass is so far south is not to accommodate City growth but because of existing infrastructure - mostly several huge pipelines, but also the SaskEnergy caverns and a little-used rail line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1547  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 7:23 PM
PhotoJim PhotoJim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
The reason the Bypass is so far south is not to accommodate City growth but because of existing infrastructure - mostly several huge pipelines, but also the SaskEnergy caverns and a little-used rail line.
But cities also do grow and even if that space will not be used up in our lifetimes (not a certainty, mind), one day the city will grow that far, and they want it usefully spaced from the existing former Highway 1/current Ring Road to make both roads locally useful. Having two four-lane highways just a km-ish apart would be pretty silly once the city's grown.

We discussed this a few months ago. Worth scrolling back if a person didn't catch it the first time.

Remember, too, that the point is that the bypass NOT carry much local traffic. By making it a few km further, it discourages local traffic and keeps it on Lewvan Drive or Ring Road. That may not matter much today when the road is lightly used, but one day it will matter, and it is mighty expensive to move roads.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1548  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 7:40 PM
pappcam pappcam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Regina
Posts: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhotoJim View Post
But cities also do grow and even if that space will not be used up in our lifetimes (not a certainty, mind), one day the city will grow that far, and they want it usefully spaced from the existing former Highway 1/current Ring Road to make both roads locally useful. Having two four-lane highways just a km-ish apart would be pretty silly once the city's grown.

We discussed this a few months ago. Worth scrolling back if a person didn't catch it the first time.

Remember, too, that the point is that the bypass NOT carry much local traffic. By making it a few km further, it discourages local traffic and keeps it on Lewvan Drive or Ring Road. That may not matter much today when the road is lightly used, but one day it will matter, and it is mighty expensive to move roads.
So it's strictly for truckers and the mythical GTH traffic? All $1.8 billion?

Are you actually saying the Lewvan moves traffic efficiently right now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1549  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 9:36 PM
jigglysquishy's Avatar
jigglysquishy jigglysquishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,326
It very much is for truckers and the GTH traffic. It's the largest corporate gift in Saskatchewn history.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1550  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 9:49 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,764
From an outsiders perspective. I don't see how taking the bypass from one end of town to the other would be any better. It's way out there.

In Winnipeg, the only people that benefit from taking the Perimeter from one end to the other are the people who live close to it. Since nobody lives anywhere close to the bypass, it's called a bypass for just that reason. Highway traffic going around the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1551  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 10:07 PM
djforsberg's Avatar
djforsberg djforsberg is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet;8747714[B
]From an outsiders perspective. I don't see how taking the bypass from one end of town to the other would be any better. It's way out there.[/B]

In Winnipeg, the only people that benefit from taking the Perimeter from one end to the other are the people who live close to it. Since nobody lives anywhere close to the bypass, it's called a bypass for just that reason. Highway traffic going around the city.
You are absolutely right. There are portions on the east and west parts of the bypass that might be used by commuters, but other than that, taking the bypass wouldn't make any commuting trips shorter in time or distance (I tested out going from SW Regina to E Regina).

We built a $2B bypass around Regina yet we still have our busiest highway in the province go down to one lane in each direction to go through a town of 90 people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1552  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 10:08 PM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
The main private passenger users would likely be:

- Moose Javians (and maybe Westerra residents) going to Costco

- White City and area residents going to the South/Grasslands

- Harbour Landing/Westerra residents heading to Saskatoon

Can't really see any other routes/uses that would make going out that far faster than using the current roadways.


As for Chamberlain.... This issue is the valley and the train tracks. I suppose they could have used at most $100 mill to build some overpasses back and forth across the tracks to give the space needed to bypass at highway speeds though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1553  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 10:16 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
The main private passenger users would likely be:

- Moose Javians (and maybe Westerra residents) going to Costco

- White City and area residents going to the South/Grasslands

- Harbour Landing/Westerra residents heading to Saskatoon

Can't really see any other routes/uses that would make going out that far faster than using the current roadways.
There really isn’t that much cross-country traffic for the bypass to make sense, eh?

Quote:
As for Chamberlain.... This issue is the valley and the train tracks. I suppose they could have used at most $100 mill to build some overpasses back and forth across the tracks to give the space needed to bypass at highway speeds though.
I’m glad someone brought this up. What about a 4-lane tunnel underneath the town (though I definitely suggested something else when I first looked at this odd section of Louis Riel Trail)? It’s a European solution.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1554  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 10:43 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
The Province could buy the shortline railway at Chamberlain for 1/100th the cost of a bypass/overpasses. The most practical solution is to re-route the track. Just move it a few hundred metres SW for about 1 KM where it runs through town and move the highway 100m SW. No overpasses required.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1555  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2019, 10:50 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
The Province could buy the shortline railway at Chamberlain for 1/100th the cost of a bypass/overpasses. The most practical solution is to re-route the track. Just move it a few hundred metres SW for about 1 KM where it runs through town and move the highway 100m SW. No overpasses required.
It’s still necessary to connect 2nd Street to Highway 733 and build an interchange with Highway 11, which will also serve as a rail overpass. The exit from 11 Saskatoon Bound to the town and entrance from the town to 11 Sasktoon Bound will be the extension of 2nd Street, while 11 Regina Bound will form a partial diamond with the overpass. Most importantly, you will need to cut access from the town to the current highway 11.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1556  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 1:26 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
There really isn’t that much cross-country traffic for the bypass to make sense, eh?
I'm sure, given the departures and the destinations, you may have been able to pick up that I was talking about local private passenger usage (also the general topic of discussion in the last number of posts).

That said, I'm thinking cross-country traffic would be more likely to make a pit-stop in Regina than to completely bypass it. There are more places for services in Regina than most other places on the stretch and it would be a long journey between Winnipeg and Calgary without a stop (unless someone was going to go cross-country and not make stops at the major cities along the way).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1557  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 1:31 AM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,236
I’ve wanted to say this for a while:
In hindsight, we shouldn’t have allowed Victoria Avenue to be built up. This way we could have put in a free-flowing interchange at Ring Road and Vic Ave and grade-separated TCH all the way from there to Balgonie, but clearly that ship sailed long ago. Back then, if people couldn’t even foresee the need for a Ring Road and for interchanges with exurban commuter towns (until recently), something like this would have been too extravagant for them.

I read the comments and was thinking that if the departure and destination aren’t anywhere inside the city, the bypass should be the way to go. But yea now that you guys have pointed out, the bypass is a bit too south.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1558  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 1:36 AM
Nathan's Avatar
Nathan Nathan is offline
Hmm....
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Regina
Posts: 3,505
I've always thought that Victoria could have still been built out, but as a straight-through express road with limited entry points (merge off and on only) and proper service roads on either side to service the businesses and some overpasses periodically to cross Victoria. That would have eliminated all the lights on Victoria and kept through-traffic flowing to Ring and the city Centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1559  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 5:32 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 13,764
If I was driving from Winnipeg to Calgary for Grey Cup this year, because the Bombers will be playing in that game! haha. I would try to stop out at Emerald Park and then continue along the bypass. Get gas, some coffee.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1560  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2019, 11:21 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
If I was driving from Winnipeg to Calgary for Grey Cup this year, because the Bombers will be playing in that game! haha. I would try to stop out at Emerald Park and then continue along the bypass. Get gas, some coffee.
Apparently a 3rd place team has not made it to the Cup since 2005, so good luck with that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.