I'm going to archive articles and related material in this thread, rather than have it lost in the construction thread.
_____________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SASKFTW
Committee will urge city to gauge interest in park
Kenyon Wallace, The StarPhoenix
Published: Monday, August 13, 2007
The city's executive committee will recommend to council tonight that the administration hold two open houses in late September to gauge the public's interest in a whitewater recreation facility in Saskatoon.
"Initially, there was a lot of opposition to the project from residents of City Park. But when they learned what a unique attraction a whitewater park would be, everyone was in favour," said Coun. Darren Hill.
Last November, the Saskatoon whitewater park committee presented city council with a conceptual plan for a park that would transform the city's weir into a complex with a six-rapid rafting area on the west side, another set of five rapids, four raised pools and a channel for fish, wildlife and boats. The plan is currently pegged at a cost of $14.7 million.
The executive committee is expected to recommend the city hold an open house on Sept. 22 at the weir and another on Sept. 27 at SIAST Kelsey campus to inform the public and gather input. The feedback from the community consultations, along with the operation and design criteria for the functional design study, will then be presented to city council in October. Such a study could cost between $100,000 and $150,000, according to the city.
The whitewater park committee has already given 38 formal presentations to Saskatoon clubs and organizations and has received more than 2,500 signatures of support, in addition to 675 e-mail addresses in support of the project.
Hill said a whitewater facility would make the weir safer and more environmentally friendly than the current configuration.
"A more environmentally sound fish ladder would be installed to help fish get up the river," he said.
As for the pelicans, Hill said the weir is not a natural pelican habitat to begin with, and the city has essentially created a feeding ground for the birds by building the weir -- a make-work project during the 1930s.
"A lot of people have expressed concerns about the pelicans, but we think this project would have no impact on them at all," he said. "I expect the recommendation to consult the public to be approved."
kewallace@sp.canwest.com
|
_____________________
Gov't announces $100K in funding for whitewater park study
TheStarPhoenix.com
Published: Thursday, November 13, 2008
An influx of $100,000 will aid in the study of a proposed whitewater park in Saskatoon.
The provincial government announced the funding Thursday. The City of Saskatoon and the Whitewater Park Proposal Committee have been jointly examining the potential of a hydro power facility and recreation facility in Saskatoon.
According to a government press release, a joint study will highlight community and environmental effects and provide details about cost and design considerations.
"We are extremely pleased with the provincial government's financial commitment to further study the potential of creating a whitewater park," Whitewater Park Committee chairperson Kent Gray said.
"Studies over the past year have concluded that it is possible to create an attraction that is one of its kind in the world. Development of a green recreational whitewater park is an exciting concept that our committee fully endorses and looks forward to pursuing."
The city's electrical utility, Saskatoon Light and Power, is prepared to commit $300,000 for the development of associated pre-feasibility and environmental baseline studies for a hydro power facility, the release says. This spending is dependent on the approval of council.
According to a document on the city's website that addresses frequently asked questions about the proposal, the whitewater park would cost $14.6 million, subject to a final design.
The hydro power facility is expected to have the potential capacity to supply in excess of four megawatts electricity - enough power to supply approximately 3,200 homes.
Development on the river requires approval from the city, Meewasin, Saskatchewan Watershed Authority and various provincial and federal departments.
© The StarPhoenix 2008
Source
________________________
Whitewater park intriguing notion
Gerry Klein, The StarPhoenix
Published: Thursday, November 20, 2008
The weir is considered one of the most visited sites in Saskatoon.
Winter and summer, people park along the Spadina Crescent parking lot and watch the water crest over the 11-foot drop. The view is enhanced in the winter by the ice that shoots the falls, and in the summer by the pelicans dining at the death trap just downstream where fish gather because their route is blocked.
It is for that reason so many people in Saskatoon have such a close emotional attachment to this now-redundant piece of infrastructure -- and which makes so interesting the two proposals now on the table to eliminate or at least shrink the weir.
First out the gate is a proposal to build some sort of whitewater park, either over the east side of the weir or along the riverbank on the west side.
Alternatively, Paul Van Pul, a Saskatoon resident originally from Belgium and with some experience with managing river systems, is proposing to remove the weir altogether, dredge out a river channel and use that material to build a system of islands and lagoons for recreational boating. Once the weir is gone, he suggests, tour boats and canoeists could ply the waters between the downtown and Wanuskewin or perhaps even farther.
The weir no longer serves its original purpose of maintaining a high enough water level to keep Saskatoon's intake pipes from going high and dry. It is attractive, but the structure is a death trap for anyone who gets too close and also acts is a barrier for fish. As such, according to a report to council a couple of years ago, the federal Fisheries Department would rather the weir isn't there.
But if at least some of the weir must go, I prefer the whitewater park idea more than I do Van Pul's "River with many islands" proposal.
The proponents of the whitewater project suggest it would be one of the best -- if not the best -- such facility in North America. Because of the width of the river, its abundant water flow, the river's incline over the length of the park and the fact that the river flows from a major lake that's controlled by a dam, a Saskatoon whitewater park would be hard to beat.
This facility, which proponents suggest could host international competitions, would also exist in the heart of the city, rather than in the wilderness where the ability to bring in spectators to competitions would be limited.
Besides the competition-worthy rapids, the proponents also suggest cutting a channel with a much more gradual flow, which would enable the less-skilled or even children to enjoy the river.
These, by the way, are not pie-in-the-sky proposals. Calgary is in the process of building such a facility to replace a weir on the Bow River. Just as is the case on the South Saskatchewan, the reason for the Calgary project is also related to the dangers the weir presents and the need to enhance the fishery.
Saskatoon council's support for the whitewater park so far has been limited to putting $30,400 into the pot for a $150,000 feasibility study (the province has agreed to chip in $100,000). However, council this week upped its contribution, although indirectly, when it agreed to spend another $300,000 for a separate but related report to determine the feasibility of using the water that goes over the weir to run a small hydro-generating station that could provide clean energy for up to 3,200 homes.
Although this is separate from the whitewater park proposal, the city felt it could save time and money by conducting the two studies together.
There is no question this co-operation puts in question the city's commitment to study Van Pul's proposal, which also has been referred to the MVA for a look. But the city has more of a responsibility to save tax dollars while considering the benefits of a clean-energy proposal than it does to appear to steer clear of taking sides over which is the best proposal.
Besides, Van Pul and those who oppose anything being done to the weir have an ally against which the whitewater proposal will have trouble competing. The cost of the Calgary park quickly rose from an estimated $6.5 million in 2005 to more than $16.5 million this year. And the Bow River is shallower and narrower than the South Saskatchewan.
The Saskatoon proposal started with an estimated cost of $14.6 million. With inflationary pressures on infrastructures running wild, it could be that Saskatoon or even Saskatchewan could never practically afford such an amenity.
Considering the wealth that is being drawn from Saskatchewan resources, there may be a private corporation wanting to return some of its profits by paying a significant portion of the capital costs, but that won't happen as long as there is controversy over the desirability of such a park.
If it came about, however, there can be no question such a facility would dramatically alter Saskatoon's love-fear relationship with its river.
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2008
Source
_______________________
Does anyone have an idea where the ideal location for a hydro facility is on the South Saskatchewan River? Assuming the hydro facility does not take away stream channels for fish, canoes, and kayaks, the locations appear to be quite limited.
Possible locations for hydro power???
Source - ToonTown White Water Club