HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > General Discussions, Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2016, 7:19 PM
artvandelay's Avatar
artvandelay artvandelay is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The City of Cows
Posts: 1,670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooster View Post
McMahon doesn't need expansion, only renovation. I would gut the concourse, and add a new facade that extends over the stands as a roof a bit like BMO or Ottawa's stadium. I think that could be done for ~$100m
That still leaves us with a stadium that is worse than those in the majority of Canadian cities save for Ottawa and Montreal. The stadium needs (at minimum), the following:

- Seats throughout ($10 million or so based on Commonwealth seat replacement)

- Some type of roof covering a portion of the stands. ($55 million to put in place at BMO).

- A climate controlled concourse that is double the square footage of the current one (the current concourse is built for a stadium of 22,000). If you do this, you still have to contend with the tight column spacing for the upper stand supports. (There is no precedent for this exact project, but interior renovations to BC Place, which were cosmetic in nature, were completed in 2009 at a cost of $65 million. Obviously, McMahon concourse renovations would cost more.)

- Expanded corporate box seating. It would be best to have a ring of suites midway up the stands and a second deck cantilevered over these, but this would require demolition of the existing upper stands. A very costly endeavour.

- Plus the cost to host games at a temporary stadium during the renovation ($15 million for Empire Field).

- Added costs resultant from any unpleasant surprises uncovered during the renovation.

In any case, it's far better to start from scratch. Which makes the combined stadium/arena idea a smart, low-cost alternative for the city. In speaking with cost consultants regarding this, the consensus is that any major renovation of McMahon Stadium is a fool's errand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2016, 5:19 PM
tomthumb2's Avatar
tomthumb2 tomthumb2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 682
^^^ Well said Art! Everyone who thinks McMahon should be renovated should read your post.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2016, 4:15 PM
Vercingetorix's Avatar
Vercingetorix Vercingetorix is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Totally agree. I don't like the idea of renovating McMahon unless it's a heavy duty reno, in which case it's probably better to start from scratch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by artvandelay View Post
That still leaves us with a stadium that is worse than those in the majority of Canadian cities save for Ottawa and Montreal. The stadium needs (at minimum), the following:

- Seats throughout ($10 million or so based on Commonwealth seat replacement)

- Some type of roof covering a portion of the stands. ($55 million to put in place at BMO).

- A climate controlled concourse that is double the square footage of the current one (the current concourse is built for a stadium of 22,000). If you do this, you still have to contend with the tight column spacing for the upper stand supports. (There is no precedent for this exact project, but interior renovations to BC Place, which were cosmetic in nature, were completed in 2009 at a cost of $65 million. Obviously, McMahon concourse renovations would cost more.)

- Expanded corporate box seating. It would be best to have a ring of suites midway up the stands and a second deck cantilevered over these, but this would require demolition of the existing upper stands. A very costly endeavour.

- Plus the cost to host games at a temporary stadium during the renovation ($15 million for Empire Field).

- Added costs resultant from any unpleasant surprises uncovered during the renovation.

In any case, it's far better to start from scratch. Which makes the combined stadium/arena idea a smart, low-cost alternative for the city. In speaking with cost consultants regarding this, the consensus is that any major renovation of McMahon Stadium is a fool's errand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2016, 4:38 AM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
While we may be looking toward the 2026 Winter Games as an opportunity to improve our stadium situation, the 2018 Winter Games might just reveal a new possibility. The Alpensia Ski Jumping Stadium that will be used for ski jumping in 2018 is currently being used by Gangwon F.C. of the Korean K-League. The club are able to play in the stadium as the three stands of the stadium are arranged around a grass field that can accommodate an association football pitch.

If Calgary were to get the 2026 Winter Games, could a stadium similar to the Alpensia Ski Jumping Stadium be built at COP? Would it work?


Source: Unknown


Source: Unknown


Source: Wikipedia
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2016, 2:05 PM
RyLucky's Avatar
RyLucky RyLucky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,498
Calgary's probably one of the only cities you could use both sports in the same month week day. It could be quite a way for the ref to make an entrance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2016, 4:02 AM
You Need A Thneed's Avatar
You Need A Thneed You Need A Thneed is offline
Construction Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Castleridge, NE Calgary
Posts: 5,892
I don't think there's even enough room for modern ski jumps at COP, never mind that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2016, 1:36 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
building something temporary at McMahon would probably work. Wonder if it would be feasible to build big air/half pipe over the opposite end zone. That would be a cool venue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2016, 11:31 PM
McMurph McMurph is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
building something temporary at McMahon would probably work. Wonder if it would be feasible to build big air/half pipe over the opposite end zone. That would be a cool venue.
The tower and ramp is only part of the vertical. The jump and run-out needs a big hill. Building it on flat land would be epic, idiotic and/or impossible. COP is already marginal in terms of vertical and run-out, and fundamentally flawed due to wind. Although I would love to have the jumps in the city I suspect they would end up building something new out at the Canmore Nordic Centre. The sliding stuff would stay at COP on the existing (and still World Cup worthy) tracks.

Of note, the original 88 proposal had all the nordic stuff (incl. XC and ski-jumping) in Bragg Creek, along with the alpine proposals at Tent Ridge and Mt Sparrowhawk in the Spray Valley.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > General Discussions, Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:59 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.