HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1101  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 2:34 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
As long as Chestermere is charged fairly, this can only be good. The more buses using that infrastructure, the more it makes sense to upgrade it further.

Quote:
"That's weird," said Nenshi. "We haven't had a chance at the City of Calgary administration to vet those numbers. They don't pass the smell test for me at this point."
Nenshi is right, the costs don't make sense. How could extending the Max Purple cost 10x the other options?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1102  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 5:13 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
As long as Chestermere is charged fairly, this can only be good. The more buses using that infrastructure, the more it makes sense to upgrade it further.



Nenshi is right, the costs don't make sense. How could extending the Max Purple cost 10x the other options?
The extra cost for Max Purple service to Chestermere is to bring the service level up to Max standards, including:
1. MAX Comfort: Heated shelters, larger platforms, real-time displays, improved lighting and CCTV security cameras provide commuters with a new level of comfort, accessibility and safety.
2. MAX Convenience:With signal-light priority and queue jumps to bypass traffic, plus fewer stops, MAX gets you to your destination before you know it.
3. MAX Connections: With fewer transfers and better connections to major destinations, the CTrain and other bus routes, MAX makes it easier to get where you need to go.

Comfort and Convenience Max service levels will cost a lot in Chestermere because the town does not have any existing infrastructure and no further requirement for new infrastructure. Example; the signal light priority on 17th Ave is cost shared between Roads and Transit. But in Chestermere, their Roads don't require anything approaching that level of sophistication.
__________________
United Premier a Elite latte lifter. Climber of swanky bridges.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1103  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 7:41 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cage View Post
The extra cost for Max Purple service to Chestermere is to bring the service level up to Max standards, including:
1. MAX Comfort: Heated shelters, larger platforms, real-time displays, improved lighting and CCTV security cameras provide commuters with a new level of comfort, accessibility and safety.
2. MAX Convenience:With signal-light priority and queue jumps to bypass traffic, plus fewer stops, MAX gets you to your destination before you know it.
3. MAX Connections: With fewer transfers and better connections to major destinations, the CTrain and other bus routes, MAX makes it easier to get where you need to go.

Comfort and Convenience Max service levels will cost a lot in Chestermere because the town does not have any existing infrastructure and no further requirement for new infrastructure. Example; the signal light priority on 17th Ave is cost shared between Roads and Transit. But in Chestermere, their Roads don't require anything approaching that level of sophistication.
I assume that's from a city website given the language?

Makes the CBC article a but misleading, as they quoted 'annual costs' but presumably it's only the up front cost that will cost significantly more while the running costs are not so largely different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1104  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 9:01 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
The cost quoted is probably the estimated cost of running every MAX Purple bus to Chestermere. Even having half of the buses short turn would reduce the cost by a lot, and Chestermere can decide later to increase the frequency.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1105  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2019, 10:51 PM
para transit fellow para transit fellow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
As long as Chestermere is charged fairly, this can only be good. The more buses using that infrastructure, the more it makes sense to upgrade it further.



Nenshi is right, the costs don't make sense. How could extending the Max Purple cost 10x the other options?
Nenshi is wrong on this.

cost to run purple max peak hours $165,000 (to run m-r 7-9 am an 3 - 6 pm)
only a few buses are required to make the extended runs

similarly the cost to run between Chestermere and east hills all day -- only a few buses are needed.

But Max runs something like 6 am to midnight seven days a week and every 12 minutes ( or more) that kind of headway means you need more buses

if you are bringing the entire MAX to out to Chestermere, you are practically doubling the route length of EVERY bus on the route-- you will need even MORE buses to maintain the headway. I'm guessing maybe 8,000 to 12,000 additional service hours annually to maintain the high frequency schedule of the MAX BRT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1106  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2019, 2:09 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
It seems highly sensible to me that an year 0 you don't build much, if any, dedicated infrastructure and just run a minimal service. If few use it, now you know the demand. If it turns out it's packed, then we have justification to upgrade and it should be easy to do. Is the road from Calgary to Chestermere slated for twinning in the foreseeable future?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1107  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2019, 6:23 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by para transit fellow View Post
Nenshi is wrong on this.

cost to run purple max peak hours $165,000 (to run m-r 7-9 am an 3 - 6 pm)
only a few buses are required to make the extended runs

similarly the cost to run between Chestermere and east hills all day -- only a few buses are needed.

But Max runs something like 6 am to midnight seven days a week and every 12 minutes ( or more) that kind of headway means you need more buses

if you are bringing the entire MAX to out to Chestermere, you are practically doubling the route length of EVERY bus on the route-- you will need even MORE buses to maintain the headway. I'm guessing maybe 8,000 to 12,000 additional service hours annually to maintain the high frequency schedule of the MAX BRT
Why wouldn't they run dedicated busses from a terminal or a few stops in Chestermere into East Hills and turn back from there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1108  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2019, 8:09 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Why wouldn't they run dedicated busses from a terminal or a few stops in Chestermere into East Hills and turn back from there?
Well that's what they're trying to decide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1109  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2019, 9:03 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Why wouldn't they run dedicated busses from a terminal or a few stops in Chestermere into East Hills and turn back from there?
The main problem would be trying to maintain precise timing and forcing a transfer when you could just extend a similar number of trips for the same cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1110  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 7:58 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
Somewhat on topic maybe, but Car2Go is pulling out of Calgary at the end of October

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...gary-1.5300253
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1111  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2019, 10:00 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyEdge View Post
Somewhat on topic maybe, but Car2Go is pulling out of Calgary at the end of October

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...gary-1.5300253
Looks like they're only going to stay in the most congested markets. Within a few years they'll be gone completely. If Chicago isn't a viable market for them there must be something very wrong with their business model.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1112  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2019, 12:23 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Yeah it's confusing and disappointing why Calgary wouldn't be a viable market. There's plenty of demand, the streets are relatively uncongested, gas is cheap, regulation isn't too onerous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1113  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 2:02 AM
para transit fellow para transit fellow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 238
Prior to Uber, car 2 go was the ticket for short inner city trips

The landscape has changed for car-sharing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1114  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 10:53 AM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Cochrane is launching their local transit system in one week’s time. It will be purely on demand. Future plans include trips to Crowfoot LRT station and/or post secondary campuses. A future transit hub will also be adjacent to the railway for future access to regional rail services!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1115  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 2:11 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,499
Quote:
Originally Posted by YYCguys View Post
Cochrane is launching their local transit system in one week’s time. It will be purely on demand. Future plans include trips to Crowfoot LRT station and/or post secondary campuses. A future transit hub will also be adjacent to the railway for future access to regional rail services!
Will there be an app?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1116  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2019, 7:47 PM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Will there be an app?
Yes. Ride Colt (Colt stands for Cochrane On demand local transit).

Info @ http://ridecolt.ca/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1117  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 3:48 PM
DizzyEdge's Avatar
DizzyEdge DizzyEdge is offline
My Spoon Is Too Big
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Yeah it's confusing and disappointing why Calgary wouldn't be a viable market. There's plenty of demand, the streets are relatively uncongested, gas is cheap, regulation isn't too onerous.
An imperfect metric, but I checked out the responses to each city's twitter announcement on the weekend. 160 responses in Calgary, 50 in Portland, and then Denver/Chicago/Austin had only 5-10, so I guess there wasn't much caring there vs a lot of upset users in Calgary.

Also people in Portland were pissed because a few months ago Car2go bought their only car sharing competitor there, shutting it down, and now this.
__________________
Concerned about protecting Calgary's built heritage?
www.CalgaryHeritage.org
News - Heritage Watch - Forums

Last edited by DizzyEdge; Sep 30, 2019 at 5:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1118  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 6:31 PM
DoubleK DoubleK is offline
Near Generational
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by YYCguys View Post
Cochrane is launching their local transit system in one week’s time. It will be purely on demand. Future plans include trips to Crowfoot LRT station and/or post secondary campuses. A future transit hub will also be adjacent to the railway for future access to regional rail services!
I'm very interested in seeing how this works out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1119  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2019, 8:40 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
I'm very interested in seeing how this works out.
The on demand part sounds very interesting and possibly the way to go. How far in advance do people need to order a ride?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1120  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2019, 1:11 AM
YYCguys YYCguys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
The on demand part sounds very interesting and possibly the way to go. How far in advance do people need to order a ride?
According to the website, from as far out as a week, to as soon as a few minutes prior.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.