HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1641  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 6:23 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,586
I haven't tried looking inside recently, but is there zero work being done in "their" space?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1642  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 7:04 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
Promenade

By City of Rain @ SkyRise cities Dec 3rd:

Quote:
Originally Posted by City Of Rain, post: 1283618, member: 70034
IMG_8661 by Hung Lam, on Flickr

IMG_8664 by Hung Lam, on Flickr

IMG_8668 by Hung Lam, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1643  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 7:34 AM
CBeats CBeats is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 421
Whole Foods confirmed publicly last night that they'll be opening in March or April (can't rmb which month) of next year. All is good in the world!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1644  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 6:01 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBeats View Post
Whole Foods confirmed publicly last night that they'll be opening in March or April (can't rmb which month) of next year. All is good in the world!
Any source?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1645  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 8:27 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167


Quote:
Tower options presented at Harry Jerome lands open house

City of North Vancouver residents were shown a few scenarios of what a massive 23rd Street development proposal for the Harry Jerome neighbourhood lands might look like at an open house recently, which included concepts for two or three new highrise towers.

Darwin Properties hosted the public open house at the North Vancouver school district office Wednesday evening.

Community input from the open house is meant to assist Darwin in crafting its future rezoning application to the city, explained Darwin president Oliver Webbe.

“We’re going to gather all of this information – we have an online survey as well – so that people are going to rank what they like the most so hopefully we can provide the most of that,” Webbe said.

If Darwin’s proposal to council is accepted, the developer would sign a 99-year lease on the land that is currently occupied by the old Harry Jerome recreation centre.

North Vancouver City would then use the money from that lease to help fund the new Harry Jerome rec centre being built across the street.

“The two options that we’re really asking is for the community to give us feedback on whether they like the three-tower option or the two-tower option,” Webbe said.

While the tower scenarios presented at the open house were just concepts, they offered a look at where new potential housing could be located on the lands assuming an application to the city was approved.

The three-tower option that was presented showed one highrise building located off Lonsdale Avenue along 23rd Street and two other highrises tucked away at the corners of 21st and 22nd streets along Eastern Avenue.

The three-tower scenario also included the addition of three mid-rise buildings to be built in conjuncture.

The two-tower option included two slightly taller towers – one along 23rd Street near Lonsdale Avenue and the other at the corner of 22nd Street and Eastern Avenue – in addition to up to four mid-rise buildings.

Community members also got a peek at some of the amenities Darwin is proposing, including space for retail, childcare facilities, a medical office, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure that integrates with the city’s Green Necklace trail system.

Although Darwin couldn’t yet specify how many total units might be available to rent or own in either tower option, executive vice-president David Jacobson anticipated the number of housing units and amenities would remain the same regardless if the public favoured the two- or three-tower option.

“What we’re proposing is that whichever option is selected the same group or list of various benefits and amenities will be delivered no matter which option is selected. They’ll be exactly the same,” he said.

One trade-off between the competing tower scenarios involves building height. The neighbourhood lands is currently zoned to facilitate a maximum height of 20 storeys under the official community plan, but Darwin might apply for an exemption with regards to the two-tower option if public input is more in favour of that scenario.

“They’ve got two options that they’re presenting and those options are predominately the idea of: Do you put three towers on the site and stay completely compliant with the OCP height caps that are in there now? Or do you take away that third tower, keep the towers on one side of the site and do that same density but do it by allowing for a little bit of extra height on those towers?” explained city planning director Michael Epp.

Darwin is expected to make its zoning application to council in January and a public hearing and potential approval of the application could take place by summer 2018.

City resident Rachel Macaulay attended Wednesday’s open house and said she thought Darwin’s proposed amenities seemed like a great addition to the neighbourhood but she worried the increased density would affect the area’s already problematic traffic flow. She admitted more time was needed to mull it all over.

“I don’t know what I think yet,” she said. “I’ll have to go home and think about it.”
http://www.nsnews.com/news/tower-opt...use-1.23117025

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1646  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2017, 10:08 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,586
They should be ramming down the numbers on how development on this land helps pay for the new community centre. Stick more density on it and pay less taxes should be an easy sell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1647  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 6:18 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Here's a render of Green On Queensbury (actually on 3rd) that I hadn't seen before. This is all one building, we're basically building towers on their side now.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1648  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 6:30 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Flying cars cant come soon enough for the North Shore.

That place will become a case study in absolutely gridlock inside of 5 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1649  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 6:32 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Yeah I live several blocks to the west on 3rd and can barely get into my garage many days from the Ironworkers line up. Good luck to anyone who lives there.

And at least I can walk to Lonsdale if things get gnarly. It's not a reasonable walk from there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1650  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 6:42 PM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Here's a render of Green On Queensbury (actually on 3rd) that I hadn't seen before. This is all one building, we're basically building towers on their side now.

Nice setting... Oh except if you were to show that rendering southward you get a glorious view of the grain terminal. Traffic will be insane when Moodyville is densified. Theres what, 3000-5000 more residents that theyre planning for that general area?! And nothing in the works to really fixour traffic issues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1651  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2017, 6:54 PM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 134
I've looked into pricing for this building and it's insanity. $1.25 million for a "townhouse"... oh and strata fees are over $600 a month for the average townhouse.

Here's some of the pricing:

Final Release
Plan Home Type Interior (sf) Exterior (sf) Parking Incl. Price*
2R 2 Bed + Flex Space 1,006 363 2 $815,000
2U 2 Bed+ Flex Space 1,069 73 2 $842,000
TH-A 2 Bed + Flex Space 1,312 85 2 $988,000
TH-J 3 or 2 Bed+ Flex Space 1,463 –1,514 194 2 From $1,249,000
TH-F 3 or 2 Bed+ Flex Space 1,440 203 - 234 2 From $1,260,000
Strata fee is 0.42/sqft
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1652  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 6:13 AM
jozero jozero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 327
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowerLonsdaleMike View Post
Nice setting... Oh except if you were to show that rendering southward you get a glorious view of the grain terminal. Traffic will be insane when Moodyville is densified. Theres what, 3000-5000 more residents that theyre planning for that general area?! And nothing in the works to really fixour traffic issues.
They are putting some serious work into the park. Should turn out nice.

The entire moodyville redo seems to be well thought out for medium density nice walkable neighbourhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1653  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 6:43 AM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 134
Quote:
Originally Posted by jozero View Post
They are putting some serious work into the park. Should turn out nice.

The entire moodyville redo seems to be well thought out for medium density nice walkable neighbourhood.
Sure it'llbe a nice park, but most of those new residents will have cars and its certainly not going to be walkable in terms of walking to get groceries and walking to grab a coffee. Lonsdale is a long walk from Moodyville. We think traffic is bad now... Just wait until Moodyville is built out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1654  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 5:54 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by LowerLonsdaleMike View Post
Sure it'llbe a nice park, but most of those new residents will have cars and its certainly not going to be walkable in terms of walking to get groceries and walking to grab a coffee. Lonsdale is a long walk from Moodyville. We think traffic is bad now... Just wait until Moodyville is built out.
With Moodyville being on 3rd, and 3rd being a major connector to second narrows, this will make for a fun addition to the epic crawl.

My second case study area are the new towers going on corner of Capilano and Marine by Lions Gate. Cant imagine the impact that will have.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1655  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2017, 8:42 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
I live on 3rd and don't even use 3rd to drive east. Keith is always better. It'll be interesting to see how that changes when the new Hwy 1 interchange dumps a ton of people onto Keith. But it will also allow people to get off Keith faster. Might be better, might be worse.

Probably the biggest loser to all the Moodyville development will be the awkward intersection at the bottom of Grand Blvd. The recent renovation helps but a lot more people will be going north up Queensbury. I always thought a giant roundabout would've worked better there:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1656  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 3:32 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Probably the biggest loser to all the Moodyville development will be the awkward intersection at the bottom of Grand Blvd. The recent renovation helps but a lot more people will be going north up Queensbury. I always thought a giant roundabout would've worked better there:

On the face of it, you have a great idea. You should bring it up with the municipality.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1657  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 4:28 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
On the face of it, you have a great idea. You should bring it up with the municipality.
They literally just "fixed" that part (actually made it a lot safer, but it's still weird/an accident magnet) so no chance of a roundabout now. They'd probably have to buy out two $1.5-$2 million properties for my idea to fit as well.

Grand Blvd originally used to be one street with parks on either side, that's why the two newer streets flanking the park now don't line up with Queensbury.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1658  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 6:23 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,359
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1659  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 1:03 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
One of the most underrated neighbourhoods in the metro IMO with lots of cool Victorian houses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1660  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2017, 4:18 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
One of the most underrated neighbourhoods in the metro IMO with lots of cool Victorian houses.
Maybe underrated but not underpriced!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.