HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #721  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2023, 2:00 AM
rayfes rayfes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
Saw some Truluck's ornamentation on the windows. Think the rumor was that it was going to be Del Frisco but I guess not. Wonder what's happening with the current location. That 2nd floor was added in 2014 according to:

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/b...-downtown.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #722  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2023, 1:42 PM
paul78701 paul78701 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayfes View Post
Saw some Truluck's ornamentation on the windows. Think the rumor was that it was going to be Del Frisco but I guess not. Wonder what's happening with the current location. That 2nd floor was added in 2014 according to:

https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/b...-downtown.html
Since OCH is/was having trouble with their temporary move to the Riley, it could make for an alternate temporary location for them.

I wouldn't be at all surprised though if a new building gets announced that would take out the Truluck's building and Highland to the north of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #723  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2023, 3:00 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 360, St. Edwards
Posts: 12,380
The old location is here to stay for now, they’re in search of a new tenant.
__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #724  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 6:42 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Is this one actually 446’, or is it the 412’ from the diagrams? Most sources say 446’, but there was mention a page back that it didn’t seem that tall.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #725  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:15 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post
Is this one actually 446’, or is it the 412’ from the diagrams? Most sources say 446’, but there was mention a page back that it didn’t seem that tall.
The approved & released elevations show 446' and that becomes the official height. I don't see it on the Austin diagrams page if that's what you meant by "diagrams".
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #726  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:26 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The approved & released elevations show 446' and that becomes the official height. I don't see it on the Austin diagrams page if that's what you meant by "diagrams".

It doesn’t have an image in the Austin diagrams yet, but because of how it’s listed it won’t accept drawings with any height other than 412 ft.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #727  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:27 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,326
The Colorado Tower is 397 feet, and this is significantly taller than that building. Also, Ashton is 412 feet, and 300 Colorado is definitely taller than that, even taking into account the 2 feet of higher elevation it sits on two blocks north.
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #728  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:40 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
The Colorado Tower is 397 feet, and this is significantly taller than that building. Also, Ashton is 412 feet, and 300 Colorado is definitely taller than that, even taking into account the 2 feet of higher elevation it sits on two blocks north.
Thank you. I wanted to submit a drawing that I sized for 446’, but the site won’t allow it because it doesn’t match the database height of 412’. I didn’t want to request a height correction without verifying first.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #729  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:44 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin <------------> Birmingham?
Posts: 57,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post
It doesn’t have an image in the Austin diagrams yet, but because of how it’s listed it won’t accept drawings with any height other than 412 ft.

Ok. I fixed that. I edited the database so that the roof height is now listed as 446 feet. The way the database is setup, whatever number you enter for the roof height becomes the default max height of the building, even if in reality there is more height above that number. So you guys should be able to pull it up now with a 446 foot roof height and add diagrams to that height.

I looked at the elevations for it, and it shows it as 445 feet 6 inches tall. That height is to the highest part of the building - the parapet around the top of the building hiding the mechanical penthouse. The building has 32 floors of office space - the top floor being at 378 feet. The main roof height (33rd level) is 391 feet 6 inches. There's also a 34th level that is for mechanical stuff, and that height is 411 feet 6 inches. This structure is hidden from view from most angles by the parapet around the perimeter of the building's top. Someone who entered in that height put it down as the roof height, and that triggered the goofy function as that number being the default height. I edited the building so that the 412 foot height is now listed as the mechanical roof height, as it is.

Towers.net has the elevations in this link:

https://austin.towers.net/34-story-o...lyn@towers.net
__________________
Conform or be cast out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #730  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2023, 7:48 PM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
Ok. I fixed that. I edited the database so that the roof height is now listed as 446 feet. The way the database is setup, whatever number you enter for the roof height becomes the default max height of the building, even if in reality there is more height above that number. So you guys should be able to pull it up now with a 446 foot roof height and add diagrams to that height.

I looked at the elevations for it, and it shows it as 445 feet 6 inches tall. That height is to the highest part of the building - the parapet around the top of the building hiding the mechanical penthouse. The building has 32 floors of office space - the top floor being at 378 feet. The main roof height (33rd level) is 391 feet 6 inches. There's also a 34th level that is for mechanical stuff, and that height is 411 feet 6 inches. This structure is hidden from view from most angles by the parapet around the perimeter of the building's top. Someone who entered in that height put it down as the roof height, and that triggered the goofy function as that number being the default height. I edited the building so that the 412 foot height is now listed as the mechanical roof height, as it is.

Towers.net has the elevations in this link:

https://austin.towers.net/34-story-o...lyn@towers.net
You're awesome! Thank you for taking the time to make the update.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #731  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2023, 2:01 AM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Not yet approved, but here is the diagram for this one.


Last edited by bobbywest87; Apr 3, 2023 at 4:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #732  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2023, 6:09 AM
jake.robs's Avatar
jake.robs jake.robs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 160
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbywest87 View Post
Not yet approved, but here is the diagram for this one.

Looks good up there!
__________________
Building a scale model of Downtown Austin, TX out of paper: TableTopMetropolis Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #733  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2023, 10:21 AM
bobbywest87 bobbywest87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 518
Quote:
Originally Posted by jake.robs View Post
Looks good up there!
Thanks Jake! Had to make a few corrections to it since taking this screenshot, but it should be much closer to reality now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #734  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2023, 7:13 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
Paywall. Could you possibly copy and paste this article?
TikTok may have reversed its stance on office needs in downtown Austin
Filings show tenant finish-out work at 300 Colorado is coming along

TikTok Inc. appears to be rethinking its real estate footprint in downtown Austin.

About five months ago, the six floors that the social media company leases in the 300 Colorado tower landed on the sublease market. Now, a filing for a tenant finish out on four of those floors has been filed with the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation with the project name "TikTok Austin."

Details are scarce, though the filing brings into question what the company has planned for its office space off Third and Colorado streets. The fresh construction filing could indicate that TikTok reversed course and decided to occupy four of its six floors.

TikTok has indeed shown signs it intends to continue to grow in the Texas capital. As of Sept. 19, the short-form video app company had 55 job openings in Austin, ranging from product operations manager to sales lead to AI quality assurance specialist.

If it does end up occupying the space, it would be a welcome respite from the bad news commercial landlords have lived through lately. Companies left and right — including giants such as Indeed.com, Home Depot and 3M — are trying to jettison office space via subleases, and many are having a tough time doing so. In a nutshell, the work-from-anywhere trend is sticking and some companies, such as Facebook parent Meta, have downsized.

TikTok did not respond to requests for comment, and Jones Lang Lasalle Inc. — which is advertising TikTok’s sublease space — declined to comment. It’s worth noting that TDLR filings are preliminary and the details are subject to change.

TikTok subleased the upper six floors in the 32-story tower in February 2022 when oil and gas company Parsley Energy Inc. shut down operations there after it was acquired by Irving-based Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE: PXD) in 2021.

In April, TikTok put the 126,429 square feet it subleased up for sublease.

The four floors that will be worked on are 27, 28, 29 and 32, according to TDLR. The scope of work is a “first generation interior finish out of tenant office space,” and will consist of 84,600 square feet.

Construction is estimated to begin in October and be complete by March 2024. The project is estimated to cost $17 million.

IA Interior Architects is listed as the design firm.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #735  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 7:58 PM
Bblasa Bblasa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 113
Phase two of the interior buildout appears to be starting for those who were following along (floors 30/31)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #736  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2024, 12:01 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bblasa View Post
Phase two of the interior buildout appears to be starting for those who were following along (floors 30/31)
Is this Tik Tok?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #737  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2024, 12:27 PM
Bblasa Bblasa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 113
Sorry yes
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #738  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 5:41 PM
WestAustinite's Avatar
WestAustinite WestAustinite is offline
Old West Austin
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancore View Post
Is this Tik Tok?
Something does not smell right about this. Isn't Byte Dance (parent company of TikTok) being forced to divest TikTok in the US market or face an outright ban by fall of 2024?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #739  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2024, 5:52 PM
WesternSon WesternSon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 293
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestAustinite View Post
Something does not smell right about this. Isn't Byte Dance (parent company of TikTok) being forced to divest TikTok in the US market or face an outright ban by fall of 2024?
That has yet to pass the Senate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #740  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2024, 2:49 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,165
It's weird right? But in San Jose, TikTok JUST subleased Roku's office right next to the airport. It was a discussion I was having with my friends recently because I create content for fun and what were my thoughts were. I brought up the fact that they're still leasing more office space in America... idk haha
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.