Quote:
Originally Posted by jd3189
If a woman was reading this, she would full on think we were all sexist pigs
I always thought NYC to be masculine. Miami is probably more feminine as well as LA. I also believe Chicago to be hyper masculine despite the high feminine contributions, only when considering archetypes. Atlanta, I don’t know. Houston... ultimately masculine.
|
As a woman, it's more that I'm confused at the criteria to determine masculine and feminine. A lot of cities like San Francisco that are listed as feminine here actually seem super masculine from my point of view, and vice versa. At least once you move on from the "nature and art = feminine and finance and sport = masculine" dichotomy.
For instance, Chicagoans from 1871 to 1940 were absolutely convinced Chicago was feminine when they cared to personify the city. (For the critics, Chicago was a scarlet woman.) And that was at the height of its manufacturing prowess and reliance on brawn.
Personally, I've always thought that the city was both hyper-masculine and hyper-feminine at the same time. If we're talking archetypes it's the city of beauty and order. Other cities are the same. They just combine different masculine and feminine attributes.
" She stood in a patch of sunlight, the red blood under her shoes, the vivid carcasses stacked round her, a bullock bleeding its life away not six feet away from her, and, the death-factory roaring all round her. She looked curiously, with hard, bold eyes, and was not ashamed.
Then said I: ‘This is a special Sending. I have seen the City of Chicago.’ And I went away to get peace and rest. " ---Rudyard Kipling, 1899