HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2010, 2:37 AM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Thumbs up More Tier 1 universities in Texas!

I believe that Texas deserves more Tier 1 schools than what it has. California has nine, and Texas has only 3, of course, The University of Texas of Austin, Texas A & M in Bryan/College Station, and Rice University which is a private institution in Houston. I think that the state's brain power is concentrated too much in a few areas. Cities grow based on an educated workforce, and of course, our tax dollars are pumped more so into those areas with Tier 1 schools and with public institutions. Two of the cities in Texas that deserve Tier 1 schools or Tier 1 status for schools that are already there are San Antonio and Dallas. So take heed forumers!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2010, 3:17 PM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
Bears of antiquity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown/First Hill, Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,340
No.
__________________
"The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion." -- George Washington & John Adams in a diplomatic message to Malta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2010, 7:07 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
JACKinBeantown
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 8,824
What about Trinity in SA?
__________________
Hi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2010, 8:47 PM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Question What is Tier One?

What is Tier One?

Texas is home to three outstanding Tier One universities: Rice, Texas A&M, and UT Austin. Maintaining the strengths of these institutions relative to the best universities in the nation is vital. But this will not be enough to keep Texas competitive in the face of what has become a global contest for talent, ideas, home-grown advances, and economic development. Texas must develop more top-tier universities, particularly in the major population centers of the state. Texas lags states such as California and New York in this area, and pays the price. read more


University of Texas at Dallas:
http://www.utdallas.edu/president/tier-one/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2010, 4:12 PM
ydoc14's Avatar
ydoc14 ydoc14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 1,123
And like all things in Dallas...the University of Texas at Dallas isn't actually in Dallas!
__________________
GO SPURS GO! | My Photography
SAN ANTONIO
~ been here since April 2005...formerly sanantoniorocks21 and sarocks14
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2010, 2:29 AM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Thumbs up UTSA and Tier 1

UTSA and its bid for Tier 1:

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/loc...ll_thrive.html

San Antonio Express News:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/loc...ll_thrive.html
Good jobs follow brainpower. Top Tier universities, such as Boston's Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Austin's University of Texas, create wealth. Alumni from MIT have founded more than 4,000 companies, which employ more than 1.1 million people. In 2006 and 2007, Austin had more venture capital investment than Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio combined.

Compared to other cities in Texas, San Antonio has a shortage of multimillionaires and billionaires. To bridge the gap, UTSA will have to hammer the message: Give locally. Some local philanthropists invest in more glittering brands in Houston and Austin. This needs to change.

Last edited by max7; Mar 28, 2010 at 3:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2010, 3:02 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,544
Texas... always going for rankings. I assume you are referring to us news & world report undergraduate rankings? Texas universities should just focus on building strong programs to attract a national and international student body... and the rankings they covet so dearly will follow. Texas has many fine schools, but a school like UTSA has a very long road ahead to be ranked highly (is it even ranked as a national university to begin with? I don't think so.).

Also, how are you quantifying "Tier 1", anyway? Ranked in top 50? If so, Texas A&M doesn't make the list. Texas has 2 top tier universities in UT-Austin and Rice University.

Texas is still a relatively new state when it comes to higher education, so it shouldn't be expected to have many long-established, nationally-prominent universities. But it does have a huge population and a lot of $, so one would expect the number of top tier schools to be higher. Still, though larger and older than Florida, Florida still has the same number of top tier universities (University of Florida and University of Miami) as Texas does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2010, 3:55 AM
necropolis necropolis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 173
I'm more interested about ongoing talk of education reform. If, and a strong if, schools were forced to focus more on student graduation and retention rates rather than focusing on research then maybe the idea of a tier one university may change. To me it is wonderful to have a university invested in research but not at the expense of the students. There is talk at how much professors are paid to do research when they only teach maybe once or twice a week and if this is fair to students since more tuition money goes to pay these professors rather than student services. To me having the most or being on top does not make a state the best. Sure having more tier one schools is great and it's great that we are aiming for that in the decades to come, however, having the most means nothing unless we can retain those doing research or teaching or donating as alumni. I just hope too much empahsis is not put on having the most tier one universities without a plan to keep the prestige, people and dollars we are trying to attract.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2010, 12:27 AM
UrbanTrance's Avatar
UrbanTrance UrbanTrance is offline
Paradise
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: L.A.
Posts: 586
Quote:
Many see union of UTSA and UTHSC as the only road to Tier One status

If a merger is a marriage, faculty members at the University of Texas at San Antonio and the UT Health Science Center are not ready to say, "I do."

Like newlyweds, the institutions have "two different personalities," El-Kikhia said. "Over time, you develop your own way of living together, you develop a new culture, but you are still different. It is the same thing with us. It is going to take time."

"If San Antonio wants a first-tier institution, I would say the only shot we have got in the next generation is to figure out how to make that merger," said Dick Howe, a retired UTSA engineering professor.

Most of California's nine Tier One research universities include medical schools, which amass much larger budgets and greater research capacity than standalone universities.
Article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2010, 2:31 AM
Paul in S.A TX's Avatar
Paul in S.A TX Paul in S.A TX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Far West Bexar County
Posts: 3,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by max7 View Post
UTSA and its bid for Tier 1:

http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/loc...ll_thrive.html

San Antonio Express News:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/loc...ll_thrive.html
Good jobs follow brainpower. Top Tier universities, such as Boston's Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Austin's University of Texas, create wealth. Alumni from MIT have founded more than 4,000 companies, which employ more than 1.1 million people. In 2006 and 2007, Austin had more venture capital investment than Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio combined.

Compared to other cities in Texas, San Antonio has a shortage of multimillionaires and billionaires. To bridge the gap, UTSA will have to hammer the message: Give locally. Some local philanthropists invest in more glittering brands in Houston and Austin. This needs to change.
I thought San Antonio was on the list with 8 billionares following Dallas and Houston?
__________________
2020 S. A. Pop 1.59 million/ Metro 2.64 million/ASA corridor 5 million Census undercount city proper. San Antonio economy and largest economic sectors. Annual contribution towards GDP. U.S. DOD$48.5billion/Manufacturing $40.5 billion/Healthcare-Biosciences $40 billion/Finance-Insurance $20 billion/Tourism $15 billion/ Technology $10 billion. S.A./ Austin: Tech $25 billion/Manufacturing $11 billion/ Tourism $9 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2010, 5:28 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000
Texas is still a relatively new state when it comes to higher education, so it shouldn't be expected to have many long-established, nationally-prominent universities.
This isn't a rant, just some stats/facts.

Southwestern University in Georgetown is the oldest university in Texas. It was founded in 1840.

Baylor University in Waco was founded in 1845, and is touted as the largest baptist university in the world.

The University of Texas was established in Austin in 1883.

Texas A&M University was established in 1871.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The article
To bridge the gap, UTSA will have to hammer the message: Give locally. Some local philanthropists invest in more glittering brands in Houston and Austin. This needs to change
This is true. Red McCombs donated $50 million to UT in 2000. UT in turn renamed the school after him. In 2007, AT&T donated $25 million to the school to help with funding for a new building.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCombs...siness#History
__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2010, 12:39 AM
Schertz1 Schertz1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
Texas... always going for rankings. I assume you are referring to us news & world report undergraduate rankings? Texas universities should just focus on building strong programs to attract a national and international student body... and the rankings they covet so dearly will follow. Texas has many fine schools, but a school like UTSA has a very long road ahead to be ranked highly (is it even ranked as a national university to begin with? I don't think so.).

Also, how are you quantifying "Tier 1", anyway? Ranked in top 50? If so, Texas A&M doesn't make the list. Texas has 2 top tier universities in UT-Austin and Rice University.

Texas is still a relatively new state when it comes to higher education, so it shouldn't be expected to have many long-established, nationally-prominent universities. But it does have a huge population and a lot of $, so one would expect the number of top tier schools to be higher. Still, though larger and older than Florida, Florida still has the same number of top tier universities (University of Florida and University of Miami) as Texas does.
Are UF and U of M really of the same caliber as Rice and UT?

While I am not a UT booster, I recognize they are a great school. I believe better than any school, public or private, in Florida. In addition, to compare Rice to one of them is borderline insanity. In defense of Texas A & M, it is a tier 1 university.

Texas has many excellent universities that do not focus as much on research. Trinity, TCU, Southwestern, U of Dallas, and SMU are a few. You should not assume attending a research university provides you with a better education than a good Masters or Liberal Arts University. It just is not true in many cases.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2010, 9:19 AM
sirkingwilliam's Avatar
sirkingwilliam sirkingwilliam is offline
Loving SA 365 days a year
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 3,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by max7 View Post

Compared to other cities in Texas, San Antonio has a shortage of multimillionaires and billionaires. To bridge the gap, UTSA will have to hammer the message: Give locally. Some local philanthropists invest in more glittering brands in Houston and Austin. This needs to change.
?

SA is third in number of millionaires and billionaires in Texas behind only Dallas and Houston.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2010, 1:06 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,544
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
This isn't a rant, just some stats/facts.

Southwestern University in Georgetown is the oldest university in Texas. It was founded in 1840.

Baylor University in Waco was founded in 1845, and is touted as the largest baptist university in the world.

The University of Texas was established in Austin in 1883.

Texas A&M University was established in 1871.
I'm well aware of Texas' universities. It has many fine schools, as I originally said. I currently work in higher education and formerly taught at UT Southwestern and UT HSC-Houston. When I said that it was a relatively new state for higher ed, I meant relative to states that have more of these so-called "top tier" universities. Texas is a much less established state for top-notch higher ed than the older states in the Northeast/Mid Atlantic/Midwest and than a state like California. Texas has just not long served as a national hub for higher education as long, so I wouldn't expect it to. If it had, then that would indicate they've been doing something wrong as to not gain the national recognition. Based on its size alone, one would expect Texas to have more of these "tier 1" (which translates as "ranked in the Top 50") universities, until you realize that the state's schools, though very good, have not served as draws for national and international scholars for as long.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schertz1 View Post
Are UF and U of M really of the same caliber as Rice and UT?

While I am not a UT booster, I recognize they are a great school. I believe better than any school, public or private, in Florida. In addition, to compare Rice to one of them is borderline insanity. In defense of Texas A & M, it is a tier 1 university.

Texas has many excellent universities that do not focus as much on research. Trinity, TCU, Southwestern, U of Dallas, and SMU are a few. You should not assume attending a research university provides you with a better education than a good Masters or Liberal Arts University. It just is not true in many cases.
According to what is considered to be the standard for ranking undergraduate education programs, US News & World Report, yes they are of the same caliber. University of Florida, University of Miami, Rice University, and University of Texas are all ranked in the Top 50 colleges in the USA. (By the way, UT and UF tie in these rankings, just to let you know since you think UT is "better"). Bottom line is, they are all great schools with tremendous offerings in many disciplines. Is one particular school "better" than another? Maybe so, maybe not. That's not what the point of the conversation is anyway. As for Texas A&M, I think it is a great school, but it does not rank in "tier 1" in this system. It comes in at 61.

As for your last paragraph, I completely agree.

Last edited by pj3000; Apr 3, 2010 at 1:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2010, 1:45 AM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Post No definition for a Tier One School?

Definition of a Tier 1 University

Contributor:
By Malik Sharrieff, eHow Contributing Writer

Nailing down one definition of a Tier 1 university is difficult. Though commonalities exist, it is hard to get the many different ranking organizations to justify the differing methodologies that lead to their determinations of which school qualifies as Tier 1.

Identification:

As of September, 2009, a concise statutory definition of a Tier 1 University does not exist. There are many organizations that rank institutions of higher education and all have slightly differing definitions. Two of the most prominent of these organizations are the Center for Measuring University Performance (the Center) and the U.S. News and World Report (U.S. News). While these two organizations have differing methodologies of evaluation, they are the two most widely respected institutions within this field.

Details:

According to research done by the Texas Senate Research Center (see reference 1), each year the Center publishes a report identifying the top research institutions of higher learning in the U.S. Criteria consists of:
  • Total research expenditures,
  • Federal research expenditures,
  • Endowment assets,
  • Annual giving,
  • National Academy members,
  • Faculty awards,
  • Doctorates awarded,
  • Post-doctoral appointees, and
  • Median students' SAT and ACT test scores

U.S. News also issues an annual ranking using a weighted scale incorporating the following criteria:
  • Peer assessments,
  • Retention (graduation rate and freshman retention rate),
  • Faculty resources,
  • Student Selectivity,
  • Financial resources,
  • Graduation rate performances (predicted versus actual graduation rate), and
  • Alumni giving rate
  • Significance

Universities with Tier 1 status receive higher amounts of research funding, consequently attracting a larger number of students pursuing careers in research and development fields. Major corporations see these institutions as resources, providing highly skilled staff that can establish a competitive edge in the marketplace. These corporations are often willing to relocate to geographic areas with a higher concentration of Tier 1 universities like New York and California. The net effect is greater economic growth within these geographic regions.

Benefits:

Tier 1 universities generally spend $100 to $150 million dollars in research each year. These funds are generated through donations and state and federal matching funds grants. This translates to a sizable inflow of cash for communities surrounding Tier 1 institutions. The relocation of research oriented corporations also spurs job growth in these areas. Therefore, many states will energetically pursue Tier 1 status for their universities to obtain the associated benefits.

Considerations:

Because of the lack of consensus regarding the definition of and methodology in identifying a Tier 1 university, many complexities exist regarding the issue. For example, U.S. News actually ranks schools through the fourth tier level. The one commonality across all ranking systems is the idea that the term "Tier 1" suggests annual research spending at or above $100 million.
Ads by Google
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2010, 1:25 AM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Thumbs up Candidate for governor says it himself!

Today the candidate for governor, Mr. Bill White, says it himself, "San Antonio is one of the top 10 cities in the United States, so it deserves a Tier One University"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2010, 2:07 AM
miaht82's Avatar
miaht82 miaht82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: The Triangle
Posts: 1,316
If anything, it sure gets him some votes.
__________________
The Raleigh Connoisseur
It is the city trying to escape the consequences of being a city
while still remaining a city. It is urban society trying to eat its
cake and keep it, too.
- Harlan Douglass, The Suburban Trend, 1925
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2010, 4:56 PM
TexasPlaya's Avatar
TexasPlaya TexasPlaya is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ATX-HTOWN
Posts: 18,313
Let's go UH! Houston could use two tier 1 universities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2010, 2:02 AM
Schertz1 Schertz1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 493
Go Tigers

Trinity University buys $500,000 scientific instrument


San Antonio Business Journal


Trinity University is installing a new high-dollar nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer on campus that will help students and faculty to conduct the same caliber of scientific research as some of the larger schools in the country.

A nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer is used to learn how molecules function and relate to each other.

Trinity records show that the $498,000 500 megahertz spectrometer is now one of the most expensive pieces of scientific equipment ever bought by the university. The National Science Foundation contributed the money for the equipment using funds from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009.

Only five other primarily undergraduate schools in the country have received federal funding for similar equipment. The majority of schools with this caliber of equipment typically limit access to graduate and post-doctoral research associates. At Trinity, first-year students will use the spectrometer in their undergraduate research projects.

The equipment will be used by undergraduate students and faculty in the chemistry, geosciences and biology departments. Trinity will also make the equipment available to officials with other universities.

The new spectrometer replaces one bought by Trinity back in 1996, at the time with funding from the National Science Foundation and the Dreyfus Foundation. The new equipment is being installed during a three-week period in April and May.

The National Science Foundation also recently awarded Trinity $200,000 to buy two additional spectrometers. One is known as an inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometer, while the other uses X-ray fluorescence techniques. Chemistry professor Michelle Bushey says the two latter instruments will be in place by the fall semester.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 5, 2010, 1:54 AM
max7's Avatar
max7 max7 is offline
Liberator.
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio,(born) Arlington Heights, Ill.(Chicagoland)
Posts: 65
Thumbs up UTSA gets "Helinita"!

UTSA today announced in the San Antonio Express News that it has purchased and successfully tested the world's most advanced electron scanning microscope on the face of the globe endearingly named, "Helenita", by the staff of the UTSA physics and astronomy departments. It was obtained with the assistance of the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation. The microscope was named after Helen Kleberg the heiress of the vast King Ranch. The multimillion dollar device helps scientists at UTSA to hone in on atomic particles that are impossible to see with the unaided eye. It will play a role in helping to find better ways to fight cancer and to develop faster computers. World reknown researcher Dr. Miguel Yacamen who heads the astronomy and physics departments at UTSA says the unique microscope has generated better pictures than he has anticipated.

This is just another step in UTSA's quest for Tier 1 status. It will be a stepping stone that the school needs in order to attract more advanced students not just from Texas, but from around the world.

source: www.mysa.com (San Antonio Express News)

Last edited by max7; May 5, 2010 at 2:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.