Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas
Still, the windowless argument is kind of dumb. Do windows on a facade really make it that much better? I refuse to believe the owners of those businesses are any sort of architectural critics in the way we are. But who knows. I suspect it's because of meism, the idea that whatever effects one in any sort of way that the person can construe as negative, that they throw a fit and try to highlight the issue to others to gain sympathy/support.
|
The blank wall is my one concern with what otherwise is an exciting project. It's hard to convey just how nice that corner will be with a restaurant replacing a worthless parking lot and a canopy to match the Stephen F. Austin's canopy. The street design is really very good.
If not handled properly, the blank wall could definitely be an eyesore. There will be some downtown pressure on them to set back 10' and put in windows. The one property owner who shouldn't want the Aloft to add windows, though, is its neighbor, since that would create a deep pocket (Aloft) to oppose the historic demolition permit for their building should they ever choose to redevelop. Put differently, the only way the Aloft will add windows to its southern face is if it's reasonably sure it can prevent the neighbor from building upward.
It will be interesting to see whether an unparked hotel can get funding in Austin. If they can, great.