HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #201  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2022, 6:50 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,085
So the likelyhood is that we'll get an 850+ foot office tower? Not much by NY standards but it is a cool building. I wish it were more noticeably taller than 30 rock though...

I'm surprised Gary Barnett isn't being more ambitious and balling out more
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #202  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2022, 7:02 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 394
Homage to Rockefeller Center?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #203  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 6:40 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
So the likelyhood is that we'll get an 850+ foot office tower? Not much by NY standards but it is a cool building. I wish it were more noticeably taller than 30 rock though...

I'm surprised Gary Barnett isn't being more ambitious and balling out more
In his eyes, he is being ambitious. You people only look at things in terms of height, developers don’t look at projects that way. Oppurtunities to build a large office tower (and the office tower is slightly larger) on prime 5th Avenue are extremely rare. It never happens, and he feels he’s put in the effort assembling this site, and wants to be rewarded. Can he build a tall residential tower/hotel? See 57th Street.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #204  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 7:25 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
In his eyes, he is being ambitious. You people only look at things in terms of height, developers don’t look at projects that way. Oppurtunities to build a large office tower (and the office tower is slightly larger) on prime 5th Avenue are extremely rare. It never happens, and he feels he’s put in the effort assembling this site, and wants to be rewarded. Can he build a tall residential tower/hotel? See 57th Street.
I'm surprised that Silverstein's piece of junk on 44th, and 530 Fifth, and a few other garbage sites nearby on 5th don't get redeveloped.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #205  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 8:45 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,914
Well 666 5th Avenue was another site suitable for a new ground up office tower, but they decided to renovate and upgrade the current building. 570 Fifth really has no competition on 5th as far as that goes. We have a couple of supertall residentials (one of them mixed-use) getting underway on 5th, though one is further removed.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #206  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 9:05 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Well 666 5th Avenue was another site suitable for a new ground up office tower, but they decided to renovate and upgrade the current building. 570 Fifth really has no competition on 5th as far as that goes. We have a couple of supertall residentials (one of them mixed-use) getting underway on 5th, though one is further removed.
666 will eventually turn into another tower. It'll just be 20, 30, etc years from now.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #207  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 9:42 PM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
666 will eventually turn into another tower. It'll just be 20, 30, etc years from now.
Without a doubt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #208  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 10:55 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
Well I'll volunteer to doubt that. I don't see it likely that they pump a half billion into a top to bottom renovation just to tear it down in 20 or 30 years. I'd say 666, er 660 is still standing when we're all dead, for better or worse. Move on, there's plenty of potential in other sites.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #209  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 10:59 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Well I'll volunteer to doubt that. I don't see it likely that they pump a half billion into a top to bottom renovation just to tear it down in 20 or 30 years. I'd say 666, er 660 is still standing when we're all dead, for better or worse. Move on, there's plenty of potential in other sites.
"20, 30, etc. " as in, it goes beyond that. It might be, it might not. 20 to 30 years is quite a bit of time, standards change, tenants needs change, the owners of the property change, etc. Lots of sites go untouched for stupid amounts of time and like you said there's already a lot of other potential sites so it definitely doesn't have the odds but it's a possibility.
Though if medical tech keeps advancing at the pace it is (among other things), who knows, it might not be.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #210  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2022, 11:55 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,375
I think the factor that differentiates 660 is the level of investment in this renovation. We're not talking about a property owner spending 20 30 40 million dollars to replace the hvac and elevators and put in a more trendy color of marble in the lobby. A 400+ million dollar renovation is essentially a new building and a statement of confidence this building isn't coming down soon, and as far as property owners think, probably ever. No one is going to turn to dust a sunk cost this large, even in 50 years and since a steel building like this well maintained can essentially survive in perpetuity, likely not in 80 90 or 100 either. New systems, interior finishes and another exterior cosmetic upgrade? Sure. But unless a tragedy strikes I don't see it going anywhere. But hey believe what you want.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #211  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2022, 12:02 AM
jackster99 jackster99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 283
^Obviously it is a very extreme example, and by no means the norm, but JP Morgan completed something like a $200+ million renovation on 270 Park Avenue only about 6 years prior to tearing it down. So stranger things can happen if the market/needs are right.
__________________
"Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them"-George Orwell
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #212  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 8:46 AM
The New York Lion The New York Lion is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
I think the factor that differentiates 660 is the level of investment in this renovation. We're not talking about a property owner spending 20 30 40 million dollars to replace the hvac and elevators and put in a more trendy color of marble in the lobby. A 400+ million dollar renovation is essentially a new building and a statement of confidence this building isn't coming down soon, and as far as property owners think, probably ever. No one is going to turn to dust a sunk cost this large, even in 50 years and since a steel building like this well maintained can essentially survive in perpetuity, likely not in 80 90 or 100 either. New systems, interior finishes and another exterior cosmetic upgrade? Sure. But unless a tragedy strikes I don't see it going anywhere. But hey believe what you want.
You are very likely wrong.

Brookfield's annual revenue is north of $50 billion. $400 million for a project in an alpha city like NY is a drop in the bucket for them. It's like me purchasing a Big Mac and a Coke for lunch.

This building has 1.4 million square feet. As of right- prime location.

Considering the residential views at this location would draw enormous sums, I could easily see a 1,000+ foot mixed use tower rising here in 20 years.

Also, 20 years is a very long time. Essentially 20 years ago the Twin Towers were still standing.

I'd bet we are close to 75 supertalls either completed, UC, or proposed in 2040.

100 by 2050.

The rapacious development of NY is only beginning. The 1960s-1990s were a historical anomaly in that NY was viewed as dirty, rude, dilapidated- even third world. It was incredibly unusual for the most powerful city in the world's most powerful country.

For several reasons, those days of "Gritty NYC" are over.

And nowhere in the world is going to topple America and NYC as the dominant global power as long as any of us are alive.

Enjoy the Age of Ramses!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #213  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 2:29 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by The New York Lion View Post
Also, 20 years is a very long time. Essentially 20 years ago the Twin Towers were still standing.
What?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #214  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 3:59 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by The New York Lion View Post

Also, 20 years is a very long time. Essentially 20 years ago the Twin Towers were still standing.


Enjoy the Age of...mostly dull value engineered glass box buildings.
Well.....kinda.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #215  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 6:37 PM
MAC123 MAC123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Deadend town, Flyover State.
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyHigher View Post
Well.....not even slightly.
__________________
NYC - 20 Supertalls (including UC)
NYC - Future 2035 supertalls - 45 + not including anything that gets newly proposed between now and then (which will likely put it over 50)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #216  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 6:44 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,914




https://nypost.com/2022/01/13/how-sh...hest-pads/amp/

By Jennifer Gould
January 13, 2022


Quote:
Down in the Diamond District, at 570 Fifth Ave., Extell has also filed permits to build a 1,100-foot supertall with 468 luxury condo units to join his International Gem Tower and another planned 534-key hotel along West 48th St.

That project is still in its early stages, but expect penthouses reminiscent of Extell’s other supertall feats: One57 (where a penthouse sold for more than $100 million) and Central Park Tower (where a unit is on the market for $65 million).

… Both 50 W. 66th St. and 570 Fifth Ave. were financially backed by the mysterious private equity firm Meridian Capital.

Even as a residential, this tower wouldnt be the same One57/CPT.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #217  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2022, 7:50 PM
SkyHigher SkyHigher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC123 View Post
There still was part of the site standing in January 2002 I recall. Sorry I upset your alt.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #218  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2022, 2:50 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,914
JANUARY 18, 2022






















__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #219  
Old Posted Jan 19, 2022, 2:56 AM
JMKeynes JMKeynes is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: SW3
Posts: 4,216
The building on the NW corner of 5th and 47th is very nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #220  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2022, 2:37 PM
nlosborne1 nlosborne1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 48
Is there a crane on the site?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.