HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6181  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 12:07 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
And yes we need an expanded I35. It's not just for local commuters. I35 through Texas is hugely important for freight traffic to/from Mexico, as well as statewide travelers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6182  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 12:46 AM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 508
Name one other non-Texan major city that builds highways the way TxDOT does with massive, repetitive parallel frontage lanes. It's ridiculous and a giant waste of space, serving to only *induce* demand.

They're giving Austin the Katy/Houston I-10 treatment with this abomination.
There is no hope of ever reconnecting neighborhoods and street grids when TxDOT continues to design and build highways like its still 1964.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6183  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 3:28 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,739
Look at it this way, it's not gonna happen. This is just another "visionary upgrade plan" that won't get the adequate funds needed to begin construction just like all the previous I-35 plans before it. They even say in the article that it's subject to change due to community input, studies and so forth. It's a never ending cycle especially for the stretch through Downtown. 8 billion dollar's, does anyone think this project will get the funding they are requesting?
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6184  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 3:48 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by zrx299 View Post
Name one other non-Texan major city that builds highways the way TxDOT does with massive, repetitive parallel frontage lanes. It's ridiculous and a giant waste of space, serving to only *induce* demand.
Exactly! Reality is access roads cause many of the traffic issues on expressways. On and off ramps in terrible locations and as you stated, they are designed to increase demand and create congestion. High amounts of retail or restaurant establishments built along them exacerbate the problem. They take up way more space than an expressway should take and they don't provide relief from bumper to bumper traffic on the expressway since everyone ends up getting stuck on the access roads causing more backups. If only we could remove them completely. Sure we'll still have traffic just like Mopac through central Austin does but entrances and exits will be controlled and there will still be the option to use secondary roads to bypass backups as opposed to getting trapped on a stupid access road. Basically just like every other large city outside this state.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6185  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 4:36 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,739
Also it's pretty funny that they show this upgage vision with bumper to bumper traffic and the new managed lanes fairly empty. That's the one thing they got right about their vision if it were to happen lol.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6186  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 1:34 PM
khowaga's Avatar
khowaga khowaga is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Also it's pretty funny that they show this upgage vision with bumper to bumper traffic and the new managed lanes fairly empty. That's the one thing they got right about their vision if it were to happen lol.
If I’m reading this right, they’re only adding two lanes to the section through downtown? Whoop. Dee. Doo.
__________________
Trust me. I'm a doctor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6187  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 2:13 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by khowaga View Post
If I’m reading this right, they’re only adding two lanes to the section through downtown? Whoop. Dee. Doo.
They are adding 8 lanes in downtown. 4 managed, 2 mainland, 2 frontage. People make too much about how many lanes though. It's more about traffic flow and how cars get on and off the highway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6188  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 2:14 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Look at it this way, it's not gonna happen. This is just another "visionary upgrade plan" that won't get the adequate funds needed to begin construction just like all the previous I-35 plans before it. They even say in the article that it's subject to change due to community input, studies and so forth. It's a never ending cycle especially for the stretch through Downtown. 8 billion dollar's, does anyone think this project will get the funding they are requesting?
Hard to say but this was the first step. TxDot wants to see local support. It'll be up to them on if they will fund the balance and when. We might learn more in July at the next 10 year funding meeting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6189  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 5:59 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,477
We only get 1 chance to redo i-35 thru downtown. It has to be done right. And I believe cut and cap is the only right way to do it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6190  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 6:17 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
We only get 1 chance to redo i-35 thru downtown. It has to be done right. And I believe cut and cap is the only right way to do it.
I agree. COA should start gauging interest now in people being willing to pay for it. Would you vote for it in a referendum if it cost 30 million? That number is just a guess btw.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6191  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 11:31 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
And yes we need an expanded I35. It's not just for local commuters. I35 through Texas is hugely important for freight traffic to/from Mexico, as well as statewide travelers.
I disagree. They can go around Austin. This stretch of road is for us.

I'd rather keep I-35 the same (or destroy it completely) than institute their vision.

Cut and cap or nothing!!
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6192  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 11:36 PM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndic View Post
I disagree. They can go around Austin. This stretch of road is for us.

I'd rather keep I-35 the same (or destroy it completely) than institute their vision.

Cut and cap or nothing!!
It's an interstate. They're not going around. Especially when the only other option is a toll road.

And this vision does not preclude cut and cap. It's already showing the cut. It's up to Austin to cap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6193  
Old Posted May 8, 2019, 11:55 PM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by lzppjb View Post
It's an interstate. They're not going around. Especially when the only other option is a toll road.

And this vision does not preclude cut and cap. It's already showing the cut. It's up to Austin to cap.
People here have already explained why it's a travesty. The whole point of cutting and capping is to make a nice, calm, pedestrian-friendly boulevard on the road above (example below, from Boston). This TxDOT proposal would solidity the road above as a dangerous highway. If it weren't for the expanded lanes above, this proposal wouldn't be a big deal at all.

__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6194  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 12:18 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Actually, you know what, guys? I'm kinda coming around on this proposal (assuming the city can/will cap it). I can admit when I'm wrong. The video is really misleading because it doesn't show functioning stoplights on the streets above so it makes them look like fast-moving highways but they wouldn't be because there are lights at all of these intersections.

It almost seems like TxDOT would be supplying the money for the "cut" portion of our desired "cut and cap" idea. Am I missing something?

__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6195  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 12:25 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Guys, this is the exact same thing we saw years ago except without the caps which is still an option.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PD68vSLEMM
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6196  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 12:33 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Guys, this is the exact same thing we saw years ago except without the caps which is still an option.

Video Link
How have I never seen this before?? THIS IS AMAZING. I almost want to cry at the thought that we may actually get this. One gripe: expand the caps.
__________________
Anti-Leslie Pool. Bury I-35! Make The Domain public!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6197  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 1:01 AM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 508
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndic View Post
One gripe: expand the caps.
THIS is the proposal downtown deserves.

But I wonder at what distance a cap becomes a tunnel?
Meaning, all the supporting infrastructure like exhaust fans, fire suppression, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6198  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 1:27 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Actually, I'm beginning to wonder if the engineering will be done in such a way as to allow for the caps. The response on this document is, to me, not a good indication that the city will even be allowed to or able to construct caps at all:

http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot...pre-rfp-qa.pdf

"No deck park design is planned"

I.E. my reading of this is that the engineering design they are currently pursuing would preclude the later construction of caps. Please convince me otherwise.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6199  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 1:50 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
Actually, I'm beginning to wonder if the engineering will be done in such a way as to allow for the caps. The response on this document is, to me, not a good indication that the city will even be allowed to or able to construct caps at all:

http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot...pre-rfp-qa.pdf

"No deck park design is planned"

I.E. my reading of this is that the engineering design they are currently pursuing would preclude the later construction of caps. Please convince me otherwise.
TxDot told CAMPO that caps are still possible 2 days ago.it just has to be city funded
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6200  
Old Posted May 9, 2019, 1:56 AM
lzppjb's Avatar
lzppjb lzppjb is offline
7th Gen Central Texan
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 3,144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syndic View Post
How have I never seen this before?? THIS IS AMAZING. I almost want to cry at the thought that we may actually get this. One gripe: expand the caps.
Do you mean expand along 35, or do you mean wider?

Looking at that video just posted, it looks like the gaps (8th - 11th & 12th - 15th) are due to the entrance and exit ramps. The entrance ramp goes up and over the exit ramp. It may be too tall to cap it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.