HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10101  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 1:44 PM
Ant131531 Ant131531 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
A caveat should be added that certain foreign companies don't have the same sort of capital / debt restrictions as others. Any traditional debt financing is going to require pre-sales.

Edit: Also, do we know they don't have presales? I haven't seen anything mentioning that they don't. Additionally, I haven't been by the site, but as we've seen with multiple other condo projects, pushing dirt around doesn't mean they got a construction loan. Developers often use equity to do this to make people feel the project is real and get people on board (see Opus, see JPX's former project).
JP5 has two cranes up with foundation already in place. It's definitely under construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10102  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 1:49 PM
clexmond clexmond is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 299
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
Atlanta3000's School of Finance - Gulch Edition

Does everyone understand a $5 Billion development costs more than $5 Billion? Why? Interest on money. When you buy a $500K house, is the total cost of the house $500K? Yes - if you don't need a loan. No - if you need a bank to finance the house.

The same goes for the Gulch. CIM Group doesn't have $5 Billion in capital lying around to underwrite this project. They are asking the CoA to issue 30 Year bonds - which they will purchase all the bonds so CIM Group is on the hook if the property tax and/or retail sales tax incentives don't cover the bonds. Also, the CoA has defined milestones in the Agreement CIM Group needs to hit before they will issue a new traunch of bonds. CIM Group does have the ability to sell these bonds at a future date to inventors, but again the CoA is not liable if CIM Group cannot repay the bonds.

As mentioned several times before, CIM Group is self financing $500 Million in infrastructure to bring the 40 acres to street level. This will take 3 - 4 years and the city and state are not funding any of these costs by ways of bonds or any other incentives.

CIM Group said they believe it will take 10 years in order for full build out of the project at an estimated cost of $5 Billion. So let's amortize $5 Billion at 30 Years @ 6.5% (average commercial mortgage rate):

https://www.myamortizationchart.com/...ation-schedule


So can those on here and in the media PLEASE stop saying the CoA and the State are almost paying half of the project because you sound fucking stupid.

Why? Because this $5 Billion project is going to cost $11.4 Billion when you factor in the interest cost of the bonds.
If anything is a public good in this plan, it's the building of the viaducts to bring the Gulch up to street level. I'd prefer to see the city issue bonds for that component (and retain public rights over the streets) and let developers secure their own financing for developing the then-usable space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10103  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 1:59 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by clexmond View Post
If anything is a public good in this plan, it's the building of the viaducts to bring the Gulch up to street level. I'd prefer to see the city issue bonds for that component (and retain public rights over the streets) and let developers secure their own financing for developing the then-usable space.
It is against the law for a City to issue bonds for a project that is not tied to a source of revenue. What happens if the city pays the $500 Million for the infrastructure and no developers are interested in developing at the site? That is why the MARTA 's $2.5 Billion expansion is funded with bonds because the CoA is raising retail sales tax $.05.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10104  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 2:16 PM
skyscraperpage17 skyscraperpage17 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
[B][COLOR="Navy"][SIZE="5"]CIM Group doesn't have $5 Billion in capital lying around to underwrite this project.
With all due respect, that's bullshit. You can't convince me that a company with yearly revenue of $260 million doesn't have the capital on hand to pay for this project over a span of 30 years.

We can debate what's fair or actually realistic, but that's an entirely different discussion. And even then, from a philosophical standpoint, I am sympathetic to the individuals expressing outrage about a multi-million dollar enterprise begging for "incentives."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10105  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 2:26 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyscraperpage17 View Post
With all due respect, that's bullshit. You can't convince me that a company with yearly revenue of $260 million doesn't have the capital on hand to pay for this project over a span of 30 years.

We can debate what's fair or actually realistic, but that's an entirely different discussion. And even then, from a philosophical standpoint, I am sympathetic to the individuals expressing outrage about a multi-million dollar enterprise begging for "incentives."
First S-17, CIM Group is a private company and they do not publish their Annual Report to the public so I am not sure where you are getting your info. Furthermore, real estate developers do let money sit around. Any money sitting around is not making more money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10106  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 2:34 PM
skyscraperpage17 skyscraperpage17 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
First S-17, CIM Group is a private company and they do not publish their Annual Report to the public so I am not sure where you are getting your info. Furthermore, real estate developers do let money sit around. Any money sitting around is not making more money.
See the link below, towards the bottom...

https://www.crunchbase.com/organizat...ction-overview
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10107  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 3:13 PM
coyotetrickster's Avatar
coyotetrickster coyotetrickster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyscraperpage17 View Post
Don't forget places like Great American Cookies, Shane's Rib Shack, Mellow Mushroom, Huddle House, Church's Chicken and Zaxby's.

There's been some hemmorhaging lately though, with the loss of Popeyes and the company that owns Longhorn Steakhouse (Darden?).

That's really what I love about Atlanta though. It's home to so many successful, home-grown companies that have become household names.

It's also a city that has tentacles in almost everything.

*Aerospace (Delta, Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, etc. all have major operations here).

*Logistics (UPS, Norfolk Southern, Hartsfield-Jackson being the world's busiest airport.)

*Food / Beverage (Coca-Cola, tons of restaurant chains, etc., RaceTrac, etc.)

*Banking / Finance (SunTrust, Equifax)

*Government / Military (CDC, Dobbins Air Force Base, Federal Reserve Bank)

*Broadcast Media / TV (Cox, Turner Broadcasting, The Weather Channel, etc.)

*Healthcare (Cancer Treatment Center of America, American Cancer Society, McKesson, etc.)

*Housing (PulteGroup)

And now Atlanta has buergeoning industries in:

*Automotive (Mercedes, Porsche, Kia, PSA Groupe)

*Film (Raleigh Studios, Pinewood Studios, Founders Studios, etc.)

*Tech (NCR, Anthem, Georgia Tech, etc.)

About the only thing Atlanta doesn't have siginificant ties to is the oil industry, mainly because its geography isn't conducive to drilling / fracking.

Not sure why you have McKesson on this list. McKesson is still headquartered in SF. It has a large administrative center in Alpharetta, but it is not hq's in the region.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10108  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 3:21 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotetrickster View Post
Not sure why you have McKesson on this list. McKesson is still headquartered in SF. It has a large administrative center in Alpharetta, but it is not hq's in the region.
Administrative Center? MeKesson's Provider Solutions is based in Atlanta and over 4K people work in tis office in mainly software development and consulting roles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10109  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 3:49 PM
skyscraperpage17 skyscraperpage17 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotetrickster View Post
Not sure why you have McKesson on this list...
This is why:

Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotetrickster View Post
...It has a large administrative center in Alpharetta...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10110  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 3:53 PM
Martinman Martinman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATL_J View Post
Perhaps it is not entirely accurate, but the rationale for providing tax breaks to a project with minimal public benefit (as outlined and compared to the tax breaks) deserves scrutiny. The reality is this project, subsidized by a loss of tax revenue, would steal demand from other in town locations that WOULD provide an increase to the tax digest without similar subsidies needed.

If they can't make the gulch project work, that means the economics are not there. Which is fine, because as Newport and others improve the South Downtown, Downtown, and the west Atlanta neighborhoods, eventually the economics will make sense without the massive subsidies in addition to not stealing demand from other sources.

The only possible way this makes sense for the city, if it was the ONLY way Amazon would come to Atlanta, but even then you'd have to couple these subsidies with those also being provided be local and state agencies to lure Amazon, and then I'd still question if it all makes sense.
I never suggested or implied that this deal doesn't deserve scrutiny. I did say however that particular blog post is so entirely inaccurate that it doesn't inform us of anything. I would love to see a qualified independent analysis of the proposed deal but that was far from it. The supposed $100 million "public benefit" itself is laughable considering the Gulch development would never be "tax free". The obvious public benefit would be the taxes generated annually by the development.

This applies to property tax with max total of $500 million.
Quote:
10% of project costs will be reimbursed through real estate taxes generated exclusively within the Gulch Enterprise Zone.
This applies to sales tax. This is the state's portion of the sales tax.
Quote:
Provides for 5 cents of the 8.9 cent sales tax to be available to
support development bonds (excluding taxes for education, public transportation, and water and sewer projects).
And keep in mind that in order for CIM to get the $1.75 billion incentive, they would in fact have to get HQ2. Otherwise the total incentive will be much less in accordance with a much smaller development.

https://saportareport.com/wp-content...on-8.21.18.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10111  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 3:59 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinman View Post

And keep in mind that in order for CIM to get the $1.75 billion incentive, they would in fact have to get HQ2. Otherwise the total incentive will be much less in accordance with a much smaller development.

[/URL]
This is the major point - Thanks Martinman.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10112  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 6:39 PM
Verge Verge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Shocker! Yet another project in this town VE'd.
I actually think it looks better--
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10113  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 7:23 PM
jpk1292000 jpk1292000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
Shocker! Yet another project in this town VE'd.
I think it looks great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10114  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 7:55 PM
Verge Verge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpk1292000 View Post
I think it looks great.
I see design refinement-- Not VE--
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10115  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 8:07 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
R&B Hall of Fame Coming to Atlanta????

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10116  
Old Posted Oct 2, 2018, 8:09 PM
shivtim's Avatar
shivtim shivtim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Midtown Atlanta
Posts: 2,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
^ It absolutely is. The CDC is such an important organization with global impact/reach. Atlanta is also the U.S. headquarters of CARE.
Atlanta is the world headquarters of public health and global health, with tens of thousands of public health workers between CDC, Emory University, CARE, The Carter Center, and a variety of non-profits and consultants (such as the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists). This all has a massive impact on our economy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10117  
Old Posted Oct 3, 2018, 3:35 PM
coyotetrickster's Avatar
coyotetrickster coyotetrickster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post

Administrative Center? MeKesson's Provider Solutions is based in Atlanta and over 4K people work in tis office in mainly software development and consulting roles.
You are correct. Executives I worked with at McKesson tended to refer to most non-HQ locations as administrative centers. My BFF was a Director at Provider Solutions. McKesson consolidated several regional offices into the Alpharetta location a few years ago. She took a buy-out rather than move to Alpharetta from Denver.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10118  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2018, 1:04 AM
Pemgin Pemgin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 790
Was this news posted here? Jones Day considering Midtown Union for new office.

https://www.bisnow.com/atlanta/news/...wn-tower-93445
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10119  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2018, 2:00 AM
jnihiser jnihiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 302
Atlantic Station Townhomes on 16th:

It appears that they are well underway:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10120  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2018, 10:01 AM
1lifealex 1lifealex is offline
AK
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 286
SCOPE / COMPONENTS
- 12-story residential over five-levels of parking
- 336 units
- Mix of Studio, 1BR and 2BR units
- 3,200 sf roof-top terrace
- Amenity pool deck on top of parking
- Future hotel proposed adjacent to residential tower
- Residential tower is under construction, expected completion spring 2020 https://www.nilesbolton.com/generation/
__________________
AK141
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.