HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 1:35 PM
TowerDude TowerDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 302
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 6:00 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,773
^ oh geez, lets get it to the airport first!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 6:18 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDude View Post
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
1950s proposed path expansions

https://flic.kr/p/SdrxU4

This expansion would have likely saved a few more commuter rail lines

https://flic.kr/p/QYtdWF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #224  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 10:45 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by TowerDude View Post
Could PATH service be extended to the Meadowlands?
Yes, and it should have happened decades ago.

But it's much more likely that HBLR is eventually extended to the Meadowlands. At least this would provide good regional light rail connectivity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2024, 11:24 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,393
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 8:28 AM
jbermingham123's Avatar
jbermingham123 jbermingham123 is online now
Registered (Nimby Ab)User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: At a computer, wasting my life on a skyscraper website
Posts: 759
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
__________________
You guys are laughing now but Jacksonville will soon assume its rightful place as the largest and most important city on Earth.

I heard the UN is moving its HQ there. The eiffel tower is moving there soon as well. Elon Musk even decided he didnt want to go to mars anymore after visiting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 10:19 AM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
It overlaps in Downtown Jersey City but it follows the 1930s proposed route down to Bayonne and up to North Bergen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 2:20 PM
mrnyc mrnyc is offline
cle/west village/shaolin
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,773
what’s the status on plans to extend the lr up to englewood and beyond?

that seems to be the logical and easiest next steps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 4:18 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
Do all LIRR, NJT, Amtrak, MTA subways, and PATH rails at Penn Station have platforms on the same level vertically? It's difficult to trough run trains with tracks on different levels.
Additionally, I understand that Amtrak, LIRR, and NJT are regulated by the FRA while MTA subway and PATH are regulated by the FTA. Rarely are trains regulated by the FTA and FRA allowed to run on the same tracks, and never at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:21 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
what’s the status on plans to extend the lr up to englewood and beyond?

that seems to be the logical and easiest next steps.
Murphy's appointee screwed things up so badly the feds want a new review...its just one of the many projects hes screwed up...but none of the highway projects been affected..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:23 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Do all LIRR, NJT, Amtrak, MTA subways, and PATH rails at Penn Station have platforms on the same level vertically? It's difficult to trough run trains with tracks on different levels.
Additionally, I understand that Amtrak, LIRR, and NJT are regulated by the FRA while MTA subway and PATH are regulated by the FTA. Rarely are trains regulated by the FTA and FRA allowed to run on the same tracks, and never at the same time.
Yes , you can see this at Newark Penn. PATH is FRA due to legacy tracks interconnecting to the NEC.. The different electrification systems and the lack of high level platforms on the Morris & Essex are the biggest hurdles to merging and through running.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2024, 5:24 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnyc View Post
^ so nice to see nexis back in action!
I'm back , I had to be sneaky with that platform shot as the PATH has a ban on photography..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2024, 1:12 AM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford View Post
Yes, and it should have happened decades ago.

But it's much more likely that HBLR is eventually extended to the Meadowlands. At least this would provide good regional light rail connectivity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee View Post
Much of HBLR should be PATH but that's a whole other issue.
The PATH and HBLR systems are completely different in construction and use. The PATH is an actual railroad which is grade separated and has it's own reporting mark while the HBLR is a newly constructed system which is either at grade, below grade, or above grade depending on the location.

It's best to keep both systems separated anyways since PATH is owned by the PANYNJ, a bi-state agency, while HBLR is owned by NJT, which covers the entire state of NJ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbermingham123 View Post
My dream (which will never, ever, ever happen) is the merger of NJT, LIRR, and PATH (which is true heavy rail like the others) into a single transit system with through-running at Penn station and the WTC station.

It should be possible to take a LIRR train through Atlantic terminal to the WTC station, and continue on to JC and Newark.

most of the infrastructure for this already exists. The east river tunnel is the only significant missing link, and could potentially be acquired by repurposing one of the 4 (!!!) existing subway tunnels from atlantic terminal which cross the east river
And that's what it is, nothing more than just a dream!!! It's a possibility of connecting Atlantic Terminal to the WTC station, which will cost a lot of money, but combining the three transit agencies is going to only create a lot of infighting between NY and NJ, plus the fare structures are so different in that PATH operates on a flat rate, while NJT and LIRR have their own fare zones.

It's just best to let each state do it's own thing and not mess with the current structures. Also, NYC is the main destination for a lot of modes of transport, which is why Grand Central is currently a terminus, and Penn Station is the busiest train station in the Americas, if not the world!

If a commuter who lives in LI has a job in either JC, Hoboken, or Newark, then he'd have to transfer either at Penn Station of WTC just to do so, and the reason why it's designed that way is because of the economic strength or Downtown and Midtown Manhattan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2024, 6:08 PM
TowerDude TowerDude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 302
I think I'd prefer to see Amtrak take over any Through running at Penn Station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2024, 12:05 PM
Nexis4Jersey's Avatar
Nexis4Jersey Nexis4Jersey is offline
Greetings from New Jersey
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,284
World Trade Center train at Newark

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:37 AM
C. C. is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,021
March 2024 Ridership Numbers Just Released

March 2019
Avg. Weekday: 281,605
Saturday: 106,134
Sunday: 69,640

March 2024
Avg. Weekday: 177,646 (63% Recovered)
Saturday: 86,807 (81.8% Recovered)
Sunday: 72,350 (103.9% Recovered)

PATH should not be considered a commuter railroad! Weekend numbers are rising fast. PATH should have normal service instead of weekend service. Numbers would rise even higher.

On the plus side, NIMBYs have lost a credible claim about PATH overcrowding. Tens of thousands of units coming online and still not close to pre-pandemic ridership levels. Might as well keep adding until back up to 300,000 people a day and resume talks of expansion of service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Yesterday, 8:43 AM
C. C. is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
1950s proposed path expansions

https://flic.kr/p/SdrxU4

This expansion would have likely saved a few more commuter rail lines

https://flic.kr/p/QYtdWF
I know it hasn't been a serious proposal for 70 years, but a PATH extension to Elizabeth would be great. The density is 11,145/sq mi. That and a couple more stops in Newark (the airport and one in the surrounding community), would be such a boon to the region. If a really large parking garage is built underground, that would also help reduce the number of trips into Manhattan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Yesterday, 1:27 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,832
PATH will be extended to Newark Airport. That's in the next Port Authority funding cycle. So I guess that leaves out hope PATH could be extended further?

The plan wasn't to extend PATH just to Elizabeth, but all the way to Plainfield. That would have been a regional game-changer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:06 PM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is online now
Show me the blueprints
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 10,393
I'm a big believer in PATH expansion but with NJTransit I don't think extending past EWR makes much sense.
__________________
Everything new is old again

There is no goodness in him, and his power to convince people otherwise is beyond understanding
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:19 PM
Crawford Crawford is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NYC/Polanco, DF
Posts: 30,832
I also hope that congestion pricing will boost PATH and NJT ridership. You'd think there would be a notable ridership boost for Manhattan-bound riders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.