Quote:
Originally Posted by Koolfire
I'm not a huge fan of reverting the one ways back to two way roads. I would rather see other things done to reduce speeding like red light cams and even losing a lane of traffic to make sidewalks wider and/or patio space for buildings.
|
Using one-way streets is a way to increase the range of uses of the street, such as widening sidewalks. With most downtown streets, you have enough room for 4 lanes + 2 sidewalks. Typically that ends up as two lanes in each direction at all times, with two lanes of parking between cross streets and left turn lanes at intersections. Sometimes it's done up as two lanes in both directions, either all the time or at peak periods.
If you want to add space for other uses, you're stuck. For instance, bus lanes come at the expense of all parking. Similarly, bike lanes. Trying to get room for buses AND bikes on one street in both directions is all but impossible. But with one-way couplets, you can have one lane for cars, one for buses, one for parking/bus stops/turn lanes, and split the last between bikes and wider sidewalks.
My personal view is that you want a mix of one-way and two-way streets. For instance, a pair of one-way streets straddling a two-way street. Another option is to have a two-way street flanked by a pair of nominal two-way streets but which are only one-way for cars, with the "wrong" way direction being buses (e.g. think of 10th being westbound for cars and eastbound for buses, 11th being two-way, 12th being eastbound for cars and westbound for buses). The point being is I wouldn't rule out the possibility that one-way streets can be used as part of a wider strategy to make the city more livable - but just having them as 3-or-4-lane mini expressways is not the way they should be used either.