HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 4:15 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temperance View Post
I hear you. I found the car museum (an the brewseum) both to be strange elements of the DevCore proposal. There are a lot of things I would rather see in that spot. The collection does sound quite valuable, aside from the bizarre fabrications of Demers. I suppose you could view it as tax-payer funded shelter but you could also view it as a valuable donation (not unlike other donations of artifacts). Of course these cars are being loaned rather than donated. If Demers ever removed his cars we would be left with a white elephant.

Irregardless of all this I am still happy with all the public space and public activities contained in the Devcore proposal. It will be interesting to see where the NCC falls on these proposals.
Demers almost certainly can't find a buyer to fence the cars he's passing off as the originals. In many cases, according to La Presse, he's valuing the vehicles at a 1000% markup from the actual value.

Seriously, read the La Presse article acottawa posted. This is really his only play. He's tried unloading his white elephant collection of forgeries on every single small town in Quebec that'll listen. He's like the monorail guy from the Simpsons. ("I've sold monorails to Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook and by gum it put them on the map!")

To sum up: he wants to unload them but he can't sell them, even to people like the Sultan of Brunei who have more money than brains. His only option is to loan them for 35 years to any city short-sighted enough to display the cars. So for 35 years, he saves the carrying cost of the collection and then at the end of the 35 loan, he gets to negotiate a sweetheart deal for the continued display or sale of the entire collection to whichever city was foolish enough to accept the offer. Once the city builds the car museum on prime land, the city is pretty much screwed from a negotiating perspective when the 35 year window closes.

Heck, Quebec City's mayor even urged other cities thinking about hosting this collection to "think twice" about it.

Also, for what it's worth, "irregardless" isn't a word in the English language. I think you're probably thinking of "irrespective" or "regardless".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 4:18 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
He's like the monorail guy from the Simpsons. ("I've sold monorails to Brockway, Ogdenville, and North Haverbrook and by gum it put them on the map!")
That's the first thing I thought of too. Simpsons has an answer for everything.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 4:42 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 1,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
Holy crap, that La Presse article is absolutely devastating. People here really need to read that article. If you can't read French, you should throw it into Google Translate.

The chutzpah of Demers to keep pushing these lies is really quite breathtaking. These aren't even falsehoods, these are something entirely different. Words fail me.
Well, Steve McQueen ALMOST owned the Ferrari 275 GTB/4S N.A.R.T. Spyder in the Demers collection. (see http://mixtemagazine.ca/en/m13-en/fe...snt-everthing/)

Despite the perhaps confused claims of pedigree for some of the cars, I think that the existence of the actual vehicles (the hardware itself, not who might have owned it) in a museum might be of interest to some. For example, if there were only 10 Ferrari 275 GTB/4S N.A.R.T. Spyders built, then would it matter if the one in the museum were owned by Steve McQueen or Eddie Smith? It might still be the only opportunity for the general public to see one. Maybe there are some people who would just want to know what a $27.5M(US) car looks like.

Spoiler Alert: The following paragraph might spoil the magic of museums for some.

As for replicas in museums, it might come as a surprise to some that not all of those dinosaur bones are ‘real’; many are plaster or plastic reproductions made from casts of the original fossils. And those animatronic dinosaurs are not real either, they are just renderings. Reproductions and models can be used to provide historical information to the general public that would otherwise be missing. Providing a representation of what something would have (or, might have) looked like is sometimes better than leaving a hole.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 4:47 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
Well, Steve McQueen ALMOST owned the Ferrari 275 GTB/4S N.A.R.T. Spyder in the Demers collection. (see http://mixtemagazine.ca/en/m13-en/fe...snt-everthing/)

Despite the perhaps confused claims of pedigree for some of the cars, I think that the existence of the actual vehicles (the hardware itself, not who might have owned it) in a museum might be of interest to some. For example, if there were only 10 Ferrari 275 GTB/4S N.A.R.T. Spyders built, then would it matter if the one in the museum were owned by Steve McQueen or Eddie Smith? It might still be the only opportunity for the general public to see one. Maybe there are some people who would just want to know what a $27.5M(US) car looks like.

Spoiler Alert: The following paragraph might spoil the magic of museums for some.

As for replicas in museums, it might come as a surprise to some that not all of those dinosaur bones are ‘real’; many are plaster or plastic reproductions made from casts of the original fossils. And those animatronic dinosaurs are not real either, they are just renderings. Reproductions and models can be used to provide historical information to the general public that would otherwise be missing. Providing a representation of what something would have (or, might have) looked like is sometimes better than leaving a hole.
Your dinosaur museum example, while cute, would only be applicable to what we're talking about IF some museum somewhere was trying to pass off a fibreglass dinosaur fossil as the genuine deal and asking for a 1000% markup for said fibreglass forgery.

Most people would be hesitant to pay a 1000% markup for a forgery or construct an entire museum right in its downtown core to house the forged fossil and I don't think that's unreasonable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:54 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
Holy crap, that La Presse article is absolutely devastating. People here really need to read that article. If you can't read French, you should throw it into Google Translate.

The chutzpah of Demers to keep pushing these lies is really quite breathtaking. These aren't even falsehoods, these are something entirely different. Words fail me.
Direct Google translation:


The real story of the Demers collection

Denis Arcand, La Presse
Published April 14, 2014 at 11:37 | Updated April 14, 2014 at 11:37


Roger Demers Thetford Mines owns 584 cars with a value between one and two billion dollars, according to his calculations. The collector car trying for several months to convince a city to fund a museum to install his collection. This treasure would include cars that belonged to Elton John, Michael Jackson and Jean Harlow, among others. But what is the true value of this collection? And above all, what is the real origin of these rare items? Press investigated to discover the true story of Demers Collection.

Since mid-December, the Roger Demers collector car running a campaign to convince a city to fund a museum to house the best pieces among the 584 cars composing Demers Collection.

The efforts of the promoter to obtain public funds have attracted interest from several cities, including Drummondville, Shawinigan, Sherbrooke, Victoriaville and Thetford Mines. "Beyond cars, there is history, said Mr. Demers in La Presse. This is not the car itself that fascinates me is really the story of the people who owned them, people that have enriched the history of the world. [...] Each car belonged to a great of this world, "he said.

The Collection Demers Thetford Mines certainly includes some beautiful cars. But several claims of Roger Demers on their value, their origin and their former owners are inaccurate, fanciful, or simply unverifiable. And at least four gems of the collection are copies, found La Presse.

Mr. Demers, who campaigned tirelessly to finance an automotive history museum also offers a collection of stories that do not hold water. During a four-hour tour of the Collection, showed Mr. Demers La Presse rare cars, which many believed to have exceptional provenance.

Among them include: former Jaguar XJ220 Elton John; an M-12 gained Vector Michael Jackson; the Cord L-29 actress Jean Harlow 30 years; and the Ferrari Dino 246GT driven by the actor Tony Curtis during the filming of the TV series The Persuaders. Mr. Demers said the Dino worth 75 million US dollars.

Press traced the former owners of several cars shown by Mr. Demers: the Jaguar was bought to Yves Luc Perreault, Laval, not Elton John. The Vector M-12 belonged to Californian Edward Halimi, then to his son David, said the latter; but never to the King of Pop, he said. The L-29 Cord Jean Harlow is not the original, but a reconstruction built recently, 60 years after the death of the actress of Hollywood, said the former owner of the replica, the Floridian Al Wiseman. As for the Ferrari Dino 246GT Tony Curtis no one has ever come close. The car shown by Mr. Demers is a North American version that has almost always rolled Quebec, told La Presse its former owner, Richard Couillard of Lac-Delage.

One of the more extravagant claims of Mr. Demers concerns two Jaguar race he has shown in La Presse. According to Mr. Demers, they are original and rare C-Type and D-Type 50s He added that together took no less than five victories in the 24 Hours of Le Mans, he said. However, both cars are replicas rather, as manufacturers offer various replicas in several countries. Another incredible statement, Mr. Demers also have said the first car powered by an internal combustion engine, the Benz Patent Motorwagen 1886. The only copy is in a German museum, maintained, however, the archivist of Daimler.

Press told Mr. Demers have good reasons to doubt his claims and has faced specifically on the origin of the Jaguar XJ-220 believed to have belonged to Elton John. When asked if the car had not just been purchased by the previous owner of Laval, Mr. Demers said he had bought only one Jaguar XJ220 and it was beautiful and well that of Elton John. When he was told that the Cord L-29 believed to have belonged to Jean Harlow appeared to be a reply, he said that there are several replicas of this car, but he possesses the original. When he was told that his two Jaguar races supposed to have won the 24 Hours of Le Mans seemed fiberglass (the original is aluminum), he denied that their use of this material.

Last week, after its investigations, the press has again contacted Mr. Demers for comment or documentation showing the origin of its cars. Mr. Demers has not responded to our request.

What is the value of the collection?

Several Quebec media after visiting the collection with Mr. Demers, reported that it would be between 1 and 2 billion. Mr. Demers says the collection is insured for a value between these two figures.

For the 584 cars worth 1.5 billion, they would have had an average of nearly 2.6 million each. Mr. Demers told La Presse that another of his cars (a Ferrari Dino 246GT) worth 75 million US dollars. Now a beautiful Dino 246GT is 120 times less than that. Mr. Demers is also attributed to a Panhard Levassor-Touring 1906 worth $ 10 million. Or, a car similar in all respects to Mr. Demers was auctioned for $ 96,250 US in October 2009 at the RM Auctions auction Hershey, Pennsylvania. Among the other historic cars that Mr. Demers promises the eventual museum he wants to see built with public funds, there would be "the Rolls Royce of the best pianist in the world, Liberace," the Aston Martin James Bond Volvo's Simon Templar, the Rolls-Royce of the Shah of Iran and many other wonders yet.

The Queen of England ... or his sister

The promoter of the museum project has also shown to the Press a Hispano-Suiza in 1936 that belonged, he said, the Queen of England. Or sister. Or the Duchess of Westminster, in reliance upon one or another variant told by Mr. Demers during our visit. It also has the Cord L-29 actor Clark Gable, he said. Its cars are very beautiful, but Mr. Demers refused to show in La Presse documentation showing the links between its cars and celebrities who have owned the past. "The documentation will be made public later if the collection becomes public," said Mr. Demers. Unfortunately Mr. Demers did not want to show the rare Ferrari 250 GTO which, he says, has been added to the collection by his father there twenty years.

If true, the Demers family is sitting on a gold mine, because this beautiful sports car is now coveted by the wealthy collectors of the world. There are only 36 copies. One of them was acquired for 52 million US dollars last fall by an anonymous American collector. This is the highest known price ever paid for a vintage car.

By selling its 250 GTO or other treasures that he says hold, Mr. Demers could build his own museum and ensure its sustainability without the help of taxpayers. Instead, Mr. Demers offers to lend the collection for 35 years the municipality will build a museum. Conditions are still unclear. In past attempts, the collector proposed a revenue sharing formula. Roger Demers says that time is because he received serious offers of Canadians outside Quebec and abroad. "Even the Sultan of Brunei is interested, he sent a representative," said Mr. Demers, who also says that the Ferrari F40 of his collection was bought by the legendary Sultan, collector, who possess rare cars in its 5000 Eastern Caliphate.

According to the importer of exotic cars Steve Mama, of Montreal, said it sold many cars to Demers Collection, the F40 was in fact a Saudi owner. Demers Collection is interesting, but after three collectors who visited Mr. Demers does not help his cause by touting it as if its warehouses in Thetford Mines were the garage of Ali Baba: "To say that it ' is one of the finest collections in the world is very exaggerated. But there are easily 50 exceptional cars among its cars, "says a collector. "Having Ferrari, Delage, Delahaye of, Talbot, Rolls-Royce, Aston Martin and Jaguar, it is already very good. I do not understand why he tells all these stories without common sense about its cars, "he added. These undocumented stories undermine its credibility, said another collector. And they are wondering if the museum project deserves trust and taxpayers' money.

Editor's note: This article has been modified May 9, 2014 to clarify the 7th paragraph, that La Presse has spoken about the origin of the M-12 Vector.

http://auto.lapresse.ca/dossiers/dos...ion-demers.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:54 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 1,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
Your dinosaur museum example, while cute, would only be applicable to what we're talking about IF some museum somewhere was trying to pass off a fibreglass dinosaur fossil as the genuine deal and asking for a 1000% markup for said fibreglass forgery.

Most people would be hesitant to pay a 1000% markup for a forgery or construct an entire museum right in its downtown core to house the forged fossil and I don't think that's unreasonable.
Well, luckily we are not talking about that, then, since I see nothing about asking for a 1,000% markup on the cars.

We are talking about a man who has over 500 rare vehicles that he is offering to loan to anywhere that will house them properly. Yes, there are undoubtedly a few cars that will not live up to the hype of where they came from, but does that lessen their uniqueness as that particular model? No. The Ferrari 275 is still one of only 10 built – regardless of whether Steve McQueen owned it or not, it is still a very valuable car. Would you decline it if someone tried to loan it to you, personally, for 35 years, just because it hadn’t been owned by Mr. McQueen, as the current owner thought? What if the owner insisted that you build a suitable garage to keep it safe?

You seem to be focusing on the negative. There will likely be some cars that don’t live up to what M. Demers says. Does that make him a bald-faced liar? Can you be absolutely sure that he wasn’t just confused? Or that he, himself, wasn’t duped and believed, in good faith, that he really had what he said he thought that he bought.

Try this: Next time you think that someone is wrong in their ‘facts’, try to attribute it, not to malice, but to ignorance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 6:05 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,393
LeBreton Flats proponents dig city's brownfield program

Jon Willing, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: February 9, 2016 | Last Updated: February 9, 2016 12:06 PM EST


The city will play a major role in helping finance the cleanup costs of toxic soil at LeBreton Flats, no matter which consortium wins the design competition.

Devcore Canderel DLS Group and RendezVous LeBreton Group both suggested the city’s program to transform contaminated property would be a key funding source in their development schemes.

Both bid teams said they are considering only existing government programs to help fund the cleanup.

The city’s program caps all grants, tax breaks and development charge reductions at 50 per cent of the eligible costs to scrub the property. The program is designed to kickstart development at key lands, fuelling economic development and building the property tax base.

Applications from the development community usually breeze through council and the winning consortium at LeBreton Flats will likely expect the same consideration.



“We’d like to be treated like everyone else. We’re not looking for anything more or anything less,” Canderel senior vice-president Daniel Peritz said during a recent Postmedia editorial board meeting.

Cyril Leeder, president of the Ottawa Senators, who are leading the RendezVous bid, emphasized his team wouldn’t seek public money outside grant programs already available.

“There are some brownfield development programs in place, so we will access those to remediate the entire site, but it’s a privately financed project from top to bottom and we will avail ourselves of existing programs,” Leeder said in a separate editorial board meeting.

The public doesn’t know how much each proposal wants from city hall since the financial details are secret, as directed by the National Capital Commission.

RendezVous has estimated the soil remediation cost at $170 million. A map provided by the group shows the heaviest contamination at the west end of the site.

The property is separated by north, south and the large “option” lands to the west, for a total of 21.6 hectares. Only 5.1 hectares of the 5.7 hectares located in the north land have been cleaned up by the NCC. Everything else is still contaminated.

Like buying a beater off a car lot, the winning consortium would take control of the land on an “as is” basis. The winner is responsible for all soil cleanup costs. In fact, the NCC is so concerned about the cleanup that it might force the chosen consortium to post a performance bond in case the group forfeits on the remediation.

The city’s brownfield program could be an important part of the financial plans of both bids, but the mayor doesn’t want to prejudge a funding proposal.

“Until we actually have a formal application from either the groups or the NCC, it’s hard for us to speculate on what requests will be made,” Jim Watson said last week.

The city didn’t have at its fingertips Monday the size of the largest brownfield grant ever approved by council.

There have been some hefty ones in recent years, but not near the scope of what LeBreton Flats would be.

Council rubber-stamped a $4.5-million brownfield grant in 2012 for 280-300 Hunt Club Rd., a former petroleum storage site that continues to expand as a shopping centre. The application took into account 80,000 metric tonnes of dirty soil and five million litres of contaminated groundwater.

jon.willing@sunmedia.ca
twitter.com/JonathanWilling

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...nfield-program
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 6:11 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
Well, luckily we are not talking about that, then, since I see nothing about asking for a 1,000% markup on the cars.

We are talking about a man who has over 500 rare vehicles that he is offering to loan to anywhere that will house them properly. Yes, there are undoubtedly a few cars that will not live up to the hype of where they came from, but does that lessen their uniqueness as that particular model? No. The Ferrari 275 is still one of only 10 built – regardless of whether Steve McQueen owned it or not, it is still a very valuable car. Would you decline it if someone tried to loan it to you, personally, for 35 years, just because it hadn’t been owned by Mr. McQueen, as the current owner thought? What if the owner insisted that you build a suitable garage to keep it safe?

You seem to be focusing on the negative. There will likely be some cars that don’t live up to what M. Demers says. Does that make him a bald-faced liar? Can you be absolutely sure that he wasn’t just confused? Or that he, himself, wasn’t duped and believed, in good faith, that he really had what he said he thought that he bought.

Try this: Next time you think that someone is wrong in their ‘facts’, try to attribute it, not to malice, but to ignorance.
We have no idea what they have. They won't let the press have general access to the collection, they won't provide documentation to verify their claims. Some of the cars that journalists have been able to check up on have proven to not be what they claimed. Every small town in Quebec has given them the bum's rush.

The thing is, if they have what they say they have (a collection worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars), then why are they scouring small town Quebec looking for a city willing to build a museum for their collection. The cost of a museum would be a few percent of the collection's value; they could build their own museum, put it where they want, design it the way they want. Billionaires usually don't behave this way.

Maybe all of this is perfectly innocent. Maybe they bought a bunch of cars that were sold under false pretenses and they're just repeating the claims. Maybe this is not innocent.

Either way, why would the NCC and the city want to get mixed up with this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 11:38 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,393
Do you think they're going to read them all?

Quote:
Nearly 8,000 provide feedback to NCC on LeBreton Flats proposals

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: February 9, 2016 | Last Updated: February 9, 2016 3:34 PM EST


Nearly 8,000 Canadians provided written feedback on two redevelopment proposals for LeBreton Flats during nearly two weeks of public consultations that ended at midnight Monday.

The National Capital Commission disclosed the final tally in a news release Tuesday. In all, 7,939 Canadians responded to an online questionnaire posted by the NCC between Jan. 26 and Feb. 8.

More than eight-in-10 of the respondents were from the National Capital Region, with the rest from other parts of Canada, the NCC said.

In addition, more than 3,000 people attended the LeBreton Flats open house and presentations at the Canadian War Museum or via webcast, and there were about 11,600 interactions on social media.

“The high level of civic engagement and serious debate on the redevelopment of LeBreton Flats will help guide this historic project to a successful conclusion,” said Mark Kristmanson, the NCC’s chief executive officer.

A report summarizing the public input will be provided to a committee that will spend the next few weeks evaluating the competing proposals from the Devcore Canderel DLS Group and the RendezVous LeBreton Group.

The NCC revealed the full composition of the committee Tuesday. It includes Kristmanson, architect A.J. Diamond, land economist and planner Mark Conway and two senior NCC executives — Stephen Willis, executive director of capital planning, and Marco Zanetti, director of real estate transactions and development.

The evaluation committee will get advice from more than 20 subject matter experts from the NCC, the City of Ottawa, the private sector and academia.

It will present its findings and recommendations to the NCC’s board of directors this spring, triggering months of negotiations aimed at reaching an agreement on the future development of 21.6 hectares of land at LeBreton Flats.

The NCC said there will more opportunities for public engagement and input as the project advances.

dbutler@postmedia.com
twitter.com/ButlerDon

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...-flats-designs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 1:51 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
We have no idea what they have. They won't let the press have general access to the collection, they won't provide documentation to verify their claims. Some of the cars that journalists have been able to check up on have proven to not be what they claimed. Every small town in Quebec has given them the bum's rush.

The thing is, if they have what they say they have (a collection worth hundreds of millions or billions of dollars), then why are they scouring small town Quebec looking for a city willing to build a museum for their collection. The cost of a museum would be a few percent of the collection's value; they could build their own museum, put it where they want, design it the way they want. Billionaires usually don't behave this way.

Maybe all of this is perfectly innocent. Maybe they bought a bunch of cars that were sold under false pretenses and they're just repeating the claims. Maybe this is not innocent.

Either way, why would the NCC and the city want to get mixed up with this?
If it is world class car collection, it would be an honour to include it in a display in this city. I don't care about the authenticity of the origins of certain vehicles. Let the historians deal with that, and make sure that the display presents as accurate picture as possible. I don't see this as being a big problem. History can be murky, and not always clear cut.

We all make it sound like the government and the public is being screwed. How so? I also don't get the comparison with some small town putting this collection on display. A small town does not have the resources to do this.

If we get to see a collection of cars that are unique in the world and we can incorporate it with the national collection, that can be rotated for changing displays, I think we have every reason to be excited.

It all sounds like we are trying to find ways to kill ideas. Another form of NIMBYism.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 2:13 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
If it is world class car collection, it would be an honour to include it in a display in this city. I don't care about the authenticity of the origins of certain vehicles. Let the historians deal with that, and make sure that the display presents as accurate picture as possible. I don't see this as being a big problem. History can be murky, and not always clear cut.

We all make it sound like the government and the public is being screwed. How so? I also don't get the comparison with some small town putting this collection on display. A small town does not have the resources to do this.

If we get to see a collection of cars that are unique in the world and we can incorporate it with the national collection, that can be rotated for changing displays, I think we have every reason to be excited.

It all sounds like we are trying to find ways to kill ideas. Another form of NIMBYism.
How much do fakes and replicas get on antiques road show or pawn stars?

I have a replica of a van Gogh. It is quite well done, the brush strokes have been 3d printed, the frame is a replica of the frame on the real painting, probably from a few metres away most people couldn't tell the difference. Do I have the beginnings of a world class art collection? If I got a few hundred replicas and bought some regular paintings and claimed they were once owned by celebrities, would my collection be a good cornerstone for the Lebreton development?

La Presse seems to think they have about 50 really good cars. If they want to get these 50 cars verified and take this collection to museums or cities then they might be able to get some traction, but if they won't separate the wheat from the chaff I don't think any city or legitimate museum would want to get mixed up with this.

A collection with the veracity issues identified could bring all sort of legal problems (insurance, taxes, copyright infringement, lawsuits from various aggrieved parties). Why would Ottawa want to get mixed up with all of this? Are we that desperate to get something "world class" that we're vulnerable to hucksters, charlatans and snake oil salesmen?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 5:55 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 631
Can somebody please explain to me the logic of why we should be excited about the Demers car museum at Lebreton flats?

Let's pretend that there are no issues surrounding authenticity for the collection and that news sources in both languages haven't reported on the discrepancies.

Let's also pretend that Quebec City's mayor didn't advise other cities to "think twice" about hosting the Demers car collection.

Let's also pretend that, by building the infrastructure for a car museum in Lebreton Flats, the city will be in an extremely poor negotiating position once the 35 year "loan" comes up.

Even if we pretended that all of these things aren't actually huge issues despite all evidence to the contrary, I'd ask: what's the point of building a car museum at Lebreton Flats? What does this have to do with Ottawa? If the point of the Devcore bid is to make Lebreton a more touristy destination (a noble and worthy endeavour), do people think this car museum would still be a draw for people from the GTA when the Canadian Automotive Museum already exists in Oakville?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 6:10 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by passwordisnt123 View Post
Can somebody please explain to me the logic of why we should be excited about the Demers car museum at Lebreton flats?

Let's pretend that there are no issues surrounding authenticity for the collection and that news sources in both languages haven't reported on the discrepancies.

Let's also pretend that Quebec City's mayor didn't advise other cities to "think twice" about hosting the Demers car collection.

Let's also pretend that, by building the infrastructure for a car museum in Lebreton Flats, the city will be in an extremely poor negotiating position once the 35 year "loan" comes up.

Even if we pretended that all of these things aren't actually huge issues despite all evidence to the contrary, I'd ask: what's the point of building a car museum at Lebreton Flats? What does this have to do with Ottawa? If the point of the Devcore bid is to make Lebreton a more touristy destination (a noble and worthy endeavour), do people think this car museum would still be a draw for people from the GTA when the Canadian Automotive Museum already exists in Oakville?
Why is Ottawa not an appropriate place for any national museum? Ottawa is the national capital. The Museum of Science and Technology has a national car collection.

We can make this argument about every museum that exists in Ottawa that doesn't have to do with politics and the lumber industry. So why build any museum in Ottawa?

Let's close down the Museum of History and move it to Quebec City because Quebec City has much more history than Ottawa. Let's close down the Air and Space Museum and move it to Montreal, which is the centre of that industry.

As I said, this all sounds like an odd form of NIMBYism. Let's find every possible reason not to do something.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 6:34 PM
HighwayStar's Avatar
HighwayStar HighwayStar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHX (by way of YOW)
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
As I said, this all sounds like an odd form of NIMBYism. Let's find every possible reason not to do something.
Actually I take this as the open, honest, straightforward discussion that needs to occur. There are bound to be strong positions on both sides....

Personally.. It doesn't appeal to me to spend tax dollars to house someones (probably misrepresented) personal car collection... whether in my backyard or not.

If it is built, I'll probably go... once...

I am happy that Devcore at least is trying to do the attraction thing... but a monstrous single-visit type of building simply does not appeal to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 7:07 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 11,499
My biggest worry with the Devcore bid is its longevity.

When Ontario Place was built, it was very popular at first. But then people's tastes changed and the attractions became less popular. The buildings there were very specialized so they couldn't be repurposed without tearing them down. So they had no choice but to close it and rebuild the whole thing.

By building mostly specialized attactions that can't be easily repurposed, the Devcore proposal is at serious risk of having the same fate as Ontario Place in 30-40 years.

By contrast the Rendezvous plan is a real urban neighborhood that can grow and change organically as our society changes.
__________________
"It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves." - Friedrich Hayek
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 7:13 PM
passwordisnt123 passwordisnt123 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ottawa (Centretown)
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Why is Ottawa not an appropriate place for any national museum? Ottawa is the national capital. The Museum of Science and Technology has a national car collection.

We can make this argument about every museum that exists in Ottawa that doesn't have to do with politics and the lumber industry. So why build any museum in Ottawa?

Let's close down the Museum of History and move it to Quebec City because Quebec City has much more history than Ottawa. Let's close down the Air and Space Museum and move it to Montreal, which is the centre of that industry.

As I said, this all sounds like an odd form of NIMBYism. Let's find every possible reason not to do something.
You don't think the numerous items that I've raised are legitimate? Note, I'm not asking whether you agree with them (obviously you don't and that's okay). I'm asking whether you think that reasonable people can disagree on the points that I'm raising? If so, why do you feel the need to try and instead go ad hominem with people you disagree with by brushing them away as mere NIMBYers?

Also, Lebreton Flats isn't even close to my backyard by any stretch of the imagination. And, while I am leaning towards the Rendezvous Lebreton proposal, I specifically stated in my submission to the NCC that I strongly urge them not to reject both proposals because either proposal is superior to leaving the ground sit empty for another 50 years.

If I'm a NIMBYer in your books, you have an awfully weird definition of the term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 7:33 PM
AndyMEng AndyMEng is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 393
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighwayStar View Post
Actually I take this as the open, honest, straightforward discussion that needs to occur. There are bound to be strong positions on both sides....

Personally.. It doesn't appeal to me to spend tax dollars to house someones (probably misrepresented) personal car collection... whether in my backyard or not.

If it is built, I'll probably go... once...

I am happy that Devcore at least is trying to do the attraction thing... but a monstrous single-visit type of building simply does not appeal to me.
Everyone keeps quoting 'tax dollars' but the NCC made it abundantly clear that the developments are fully funded privately. As for the land cost/value, I'm not clear about it, but if the developer wants a car museum, they build it themselves. None of it is a question of 'tax dollars'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 7:46 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 15,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Why is Ottawa not an appropriate place for any national museum? Ottawa is the national capital. The Museum of Science and Technology has a national car collection.

We can make this argument about every museum that exists in Ottawa that doesn't have to do with politics and the lumber industry. So why build any museum in Ottawa?

Let's close down the Museum of History and move it to Quebec City because Quebec City has much more history than Ottawa. Let's close down the Air and Space Museum and move it to Montreal, which is the centre of that industry.

As I said, this all sounds like an odd form of NIMBYism. Let's find every possible reason not to do something.
National Museums are Crown Corporations. They report to Parliament, they can be investigated by the auditor general, they have to comply with a number of regulations, they are staffed by experts in their field. To my knowledge, nobody is proposing a national automotive museum.

To quote the Citizen article "Then they talked to automakers, who are very, very eager to have a place to display their products in the capital."

The partners Devcore identified: Mierins Automotive Group, Canadian Automobile Dealers Association, the Global Automakers of Canada (which represents the companies that do not manufacture cars in Canada), the Ottawa Auto show, and the automotive program at Algonquin College are in the business of selling and/or fixing cars.

I understand the appeal of the Demers Collection to this group. It's the kind of thing car enthusiasts get excited about, and it doesn't really matter if it is authentic or not, they need something that makes it sound more like a museum and less like a car dealership.

To be honest, I have no problem with this as a private venture. If Mierens et al. want to buy a chunk of land (Kanata would be good as there is already a large contingent of car dealers), build some sort of pavilion on it and try to lure the public in pretending they have Elton John's car then more power to them.

What bothers me is they're trying to do this on public land, probably seeking public money and exposing the public to various risks associated with a very questionable car collection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 8:22 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,556
I'm pretty sure a car museum could be easily re-purposed if it fails in 30 years seeing as the building will probably be pretty open concept (since they need the room to drive the vehicles in and display them), therefore the building itself is pretty much a shell, easily re-purposed for any other venture.

I keep hearing people say that the RDV group is better because the residential and few bars/restaurants will make sure it "evolves organically" and be somewhat "busy" as people will live there and use the neighborhood throughout the day/night. If that's our only concern why not just build a streetgrid over all of Lebreton and fill it with townhomes and a few bars/restaurants along Booth? That way Lebreton WILL be used/somewhat busy and it will be able to evolve or adjust organically in the future
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 8:40 PM
HighwayStar's Avatar
HighwayStar HighwayStar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: PHX (by way of YOW)
Posts: 1,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyMEng View Post
Everyone keeps quoting 'tax dollars' but the NCC made it abundantly clear that the developments are fully funded privately. As for the land cost/value, I'm not clear about it, but if the developer wants a car museum, they build it themselves. None of it is a question of 'tax dollars'.
Point taken... but if the land is sold for anything approaching market value... I'll be very surprised that a "car museum" would turn a profit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & City of Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.