Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffreininger
I, for one, am a supporter of a DT baseball stadium. Building Wolff Stadium in it's current location and AT&T Center in it's was in no way an economic generator...that goes without saying. But there's no comparison between those and at DT baseball stadium. Can you imagine being a tourist in town for a few days and staying downtown? Who wouldn't want to spend a couple hours taking in a game within walking distance of your hotel? This seems like a no-brainer to me and great timing with the current desire to be downtown for locals as well. I see some great attendance numbers in our future if this stadium ever happens. Also, there's plenty of room near the old Fox Tech campus...just saying.
|
Jeff makes some fair points. Capture a few tourist dollars, increase the ability for locals to make an evening of a game, etc.
I don't think anyone can argue with this kind of thinking. Compared to Wolff Stadium, a DT baseball stadium would be fantastic. The location would be, as he says, a no-brainer.
The rub is in who pays for it. The results of all of the studies done on the topic basically say that stadiums don't generate increased economic activity - they simply shift money from one place to another. To make the point clearer, when a smaller town gets a movie theater, it doesn't create new money for locals to spend on movies, it just means they go to the movies instead of Sonic or the bowling alley.
If this is such a great deal for the owners of a pro sports franchise, they'll find a way to pay for it.
Heck, for all of the grief I've given Hartman and the Scorpions for their stupid stadium location, the facility is the crown jewel of minor league soccer in America and they built it with private dollars - and are profitable!!
Put a stadium downtown - very cool. Just don't tax the people and pretend it's going to generate dollars.