Report to help set stage for nuclear development in Saskatchewan
By James Wood, Star Phoenix September 15, 2009 8:54 AM Be the first to post a comment
REGINA — A report that will help set the stage for both the future of nuclear development in the province and months of political debate will be released Tuesday.
But a University of Saskatchewan political studies professor says not to expect the report on public consultations on the findings of the government's Uranium Development Partnership to be the final word on the issue.
"It's not the end of the discussion. It's really the beginning of the discussion," said the U of S's Greg Poelzer in an interview Monday.
The UDP was appointed by the Saskatchewan Party government to explore ways to "add value" to the province's world-leading supply of uranium. Its report in April recommended a nuclear reactor be incorporated into the province's energy plans and touted the possibility of nuclear waste storage, among other actions.
Dan Perrins, formerly the province's top civil servant, was appointed to head public consultations. At hearings held in the spring and through written submissions, many Saskatchewan residents expressed concerns about the UDP report, especially around nuclear power.
But Poelzer said he does not expect the Perrins report to lead the government — bullish on uranium development — to immediately preclude any open option. (The Sask. Party has already nixed nuclear waste storage.)
The government can point to the support nuclear development has received in a variety of public opinion polls, he said. The nature of the consultation process also means those opposed to nuclear power are more likely take part, he added.
However, the report will likely set guidelines and boundaries for the government on how to proceed as it negotiates a tricky path on uranium development, said Poelzer.
Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd has said the government will need time to study the report and it will be a matter of weeks before it issues a formal response.
With Ontario-based Bruce Power eyeing the province for a potential nuclear reactor, the Opposition NDP has accused the government of stacking the deck in favour of nuclear development. While the two sides spar, an all-party legislative committee will hold hearings this fall on the province's energy future and its various options, it was announced last week.
Perrins said in July that the consultation process had shown there was a clear need for more information for the public on the province's electricity requirements and options, and on the issue of medical isotope production.
The government and the University of Saskatchewan have already gone ahead in putting a proposal in to the federal government for a research reactor that produces medical isotopes, which was also recommended by the UDP.
Premier Brad Wall and Boyd have said that the province had to meet a federal deadline for the proposal and it could be scrapped if there was clearly no appetite for the project from the public.
Poelzer said the significance of the consultations might not be readily apparent for some time.
"These are the kind of things where you look back five, ten years from now. I think it's far too early to judge," he said.
jwood@sp.canwest.com
© Copyright (c) The Star Phoenix
Source
_________________________
Sask. not ready for nuclear: NDP
Nuclear power lacks business case, Lingenfelter says
By Jason Warick, Saskatchewan News Network September 15, 2009 Be the first to post a comment
Now is not the time to consider nuclear power development in Saskatchewan, says provincial New Democratic Party Leader Dwain Lingenfelter.
"At this point in time, we don't think there's an economic or business case for nuclear power," Lingenfelter said in an interview Monday.
"It's not something we'd jump into, certainly not at this point."
Lingenfelter's comments come on the eve of report, to be released today, summarizing a series of public consultations held this year across the province on the Saskatchewan Party government's Uranium Development Partnership, which recommended a nuclear reactor.
Lingenfelter said the NDP has long supported the mining of uranium in Saskatchewan and supports the "potential" of processing it, but only if it was better environmentally and economically than other options such as wind power. These alternatives have not been pursued nearly enough to make an educated decision, Lingenfelter said.
He said a proposal by private company Bruce Power to build a reactor in the province is a bad idea, and the NDP has opposed it from the day it was suggested.
"We've indicated our opposition to the Bruce Power deal from Day 1. It wasn't an open process," he said.
"We didn't study all of the options for energy at hand, including wind, hydro, solar, geothermal."
The nuclear power issue was a hot topic at an all-candidates' forum Monday for the Sept. 21 Saskatoon Riversdale byelection. NDP candidate Danielle Chartier said she's against nuclear power development.
"I am a mom of two kids . . . I don't think we can leave that legacy for our children," she said.
Chartier said a Bruce Power reactor would be "economically insane for our province." However, Chartier said she'd support nuclear power development if that's what her NDP caucus supported.
Saskatchewan Party candidate Corey O'Soup said his party favours listening to what Saskatchewan people want, and that's what he'll do before deciding what to do about the nuclear question.
Liberal candidate Eileen Gelowitz, referring to her aboriginal ancestry, said elders oppose nuclear power. But Liberal Leader Ryan Bater supports it, "so I'll go with that," she said.
Tobi-Dawne Smith, the Green party candidate, said she and her party are the only ones categorically opposed to nuclear power, and used most of her time at the debate to criticize nuclear power. But when asked what she'd do if Saskatoon Riversdale residents supported nuclear power, she said she'd have to vote according to their wishes.
While working for an Alberta energy company in 2005, Lingenfelter was a vocal supporter of nuclear power in Saskatchewan. He called on the Saskatchewan government to encourage the private sector to build a reactor that could help meet the province's electricity needs and also export power to the Fort McMurray oilsands and to the U.S. market, according to a report.
During the NDP leadership race this year, his position moderated significantly. But he was the only candidate who didn't rule out the nuclear option altogether.
jwarick@sp.canwest.com
© Copyright (c) The Star Phoenix
Source
__________________________
Strong opposition against nuclear power in Saskatchewan: UDP report
By James Wood, TheStarPhoenix.com September 15, 2009 12:02 PM Comments (9)
REGINA — Public consultations on the government’s Uranium Development Partnership saw an “overwhelming response” against nuclear power and other aspects of the industry, widespread concern over health, safety and environmental impacts and skepticism towards the UDP itself, according to the report prepared by a former top civil servant and released Tuesday.
The Saskatchewan Party government said the report by Dan Perrins will not necessarily halt development but it does signal the province to be careful in how it proceeds.
“It’s neither a green light nor a red light for future uranium development,” Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd said in a news release Tuesday.
“It’s more like a yellow light — take any next steps with caution. Saskatchewan people are saying, ‘Take your time, get it right, consider all the options.’ I think that’s wise counsel.”
Boyd has said in the past the government will need time to study the report and it will be a matter of weeks before it issues a formal response.
The UDP was appointed by the Saskatchewan Party government to explore ways to “add value” to the province’s world-leading supply of uranium. Its report in April recommended a nuclear reactor be incorporated into the province’s energy plans and touted the possibility of nuclear waste storage, among other actions.
Perrins, formerly deputy minister to NDP premier Lorne Calvert, was appointed to head public consultations. Meetings during the spring were dominated by those raising concerns about nuclear development.
In his report, Perrins said he received 2,263 responses, with some representing multiple submissions by individuals and organizations.
Of those responses, 1,403 were related to nuclear power, with 84 per cent of those responses in opposition. Other major themes, in order of magnitude, were health, safety and environment concerns, opposition to nuclear waste disposal and storage, the cost of uranium development, support for alternative energy sources, concerns about the UDP report itself and opposition to current and future mining activities.
Underlying most submissions was a need and desire for more information from the public, said Perrins in his report.
“Who provides the information, what information is provided, how the information is provided and whether it can be trusted are all questions that people asked through the process,” he wrote.
Along those lines, Perrins makes a number of recommendations, including that the government develop a consolidated report on all power generation options for the province and that SaskPower publicly release any existing work it has done on the province’s power needs.
With Ontario-based Bruce Power eyeing the province for a potential nuclear reactor, the Opposition NDP has accused the government of stacking the deck in favour of nuclear development. While the two sides spar, an all-party legislative committee will hold hearings this fall on the province’s energy future and its various options, it was announced last week.
Perrins also calls for the government to commission a study to review the current research on health impacts of nuclear power and that that study be made public.
In addition, he recommends that the government initiate a public information campaign regarding the production and use of medical isotopes.
The government and the University of Saskatchewan have already gone ahead in putting a proposal in to the federal government for a $500-million to $750-million research reactor that produces medical isotopes, which was also recommended by the UDP.
Premier Brad Wall and Boyd have said that the province had to meet a federal deadline for the proposal and it could be scrapped if there was clearly no appetite for the project from the public.
Perrins found that there was little support for uranium research and development but responses were divided on the issue of medical isotopes.
“Many people who expressed support for the production of medical isotopes stipulated it should occur without the use of nuclear fission,” he wrote.
jwood@sp.canwest.com
© Copyright (c) The Star Phoenix
Source