Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One
No the conversation was diverted to Melbourne as if that's a city investing everything in highways the way Houston is.
|
You are being extremely disingenuous. That is not at all why Melbourne was brought up. I brought up Melbourne because another poster made an asinine comment as if these sorts of projects don't happen anywhere because they were planning mistakes made by urban planners when freeways were being built en masse, agreeably irresponsibly. That is how I interpreted the original comment.
On top of that Houston isn't only investing in freeways:
https://www.ridemetro.org/Pages/index.aspx
Projects:
https://www.ridemetro.org/Pages/CurrentProjects.aspx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hudson11
woah, is it 1960?
|
I then made a list of cities and states doing the opposite and predicting a response that this is American thing I used Melbourne as an example but should you wish I have other cities in India, Europe, Asia, and I believe even South America of recently expanded, U/C, or proposed large widenings I can give examples of.
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket
Case in point, if the Katy Freeway is already obsolete, why do they think the answer is more freeways?
|
Because they failed to take into account latent demand and thus an inadequate number of lanes were built. Look at parallel routes and see if those fare any better. Likely they are congested too.