HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2008, 10:43 PM
METALMiKE's Avatar
METALMiKE METALMiKE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 173
[San Antonio] Private sector may hold key to VIA plans for rapid buses

Web Posted: 01/30/2008 12:31 AM CST

Patrick Driscoll
Express-News

VIA Metropolitan Transit's upcoming experiment with rapid buses, the agency's rubber-tire answer to light rail, will involve asking private investors to help foot the bill for easing gridlock on the car-crazy Northwest Side.

The idea is to parlay what 14,000 passengers a day, perhaps many of them suburban commuters, would bring to businesses on corners like Babcock Road and Medical Drive.

Seven acres of grassland and scrub trees on the southwest corner of that busy intersection will be home to a transit station serving as a terminus for a rapid-bus line, connecting the sprawling South Texas Medical Center to downtown, city officials said Tuesday. Two acres were set aside for commercial development.

But officials aren't sure what type of venture might end up there, or even if it will be designed more for pedestrians than cars. Market studies and developer interest will have a lot to say about that.

"We're just not far enough into the process yet to have details," VIA President John Milam said.

A friendlier pedestrian environment is just what's needed around the Medical Center campus, said Dr. James Andry, who's renovating a building across the street into a sleep lab and office. Better sidewalks and shuttle buses could help, he said.

"Look here, you can't even cross the street so easily," he said, pointing across Babcock Road. "People don't walk enough in the Medical Center, that's for sure. Everything is so spread out."

After voters rejected a light-rail plan in 2000, VIA changed course and decided to make buses work more like rail.

There's no specific plan yet, but agency officials say options include articulated buses that bend in the middle, sheltered transit stations, real-time message boards, ticketing without fare boxes, dedicated bus lanes and technology to hold or trip traffic signals.

"It'll be like light rail but on rubber tires," VIA Chairman Eddie Herrera said Tuesday.

The agency's first rapid buses could run through the Medical Center, on Fredericksburg Road and along Interstate 10 to a planned Westside Multimodal Center near the University of Texas' downtown campus.

The $99 million project, about half-funded with federal grants and the rest locally, is expected to be fully designed and built by 2012. The high-tech buses could shave travel times by a third and boost ridership up to a fourth as they whisk riders between the city's two largest job centers.

Though rapid-bus systems are babes compared to light rail and don't have the same reputation for cultivating higher-density walkable developments or for attracting white-collar commuters, VIA officials will look for ways to make money from the extra traffic they hope to generate.

One proposal calls for additional taxes on new development along the rapid-bus line — through a tax increment-financing district. Another plan, the one touted Tuesday, is to carve out chunks of land next to bus stations and partner with developers to build there.

The transit station at Babcock Road and Medical Drive — with a 60-seat lobby, canopies outside and 128 parking spaces in the back — will be VIA's first effort to rope in such private investment. The agency will seek proposals to get the best value.

The station could open in two years, replacing the transit facility in the Medical Center. It later would become the terminus for the rapid-bus line, which officials say would ease congestion in the heavily traveled area.

"It will be the nucleus of the Medical Center transportation," District 8 City Councilwoman Diane Cibrian said as she stood on a mowed carpet of brown grass.

pdriscoll@express-news.net



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Jan 30, 2008, 11:20 PM
Paul in S.A TX's Avatar
Paul in S.A TX Paul in S.A TX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Far West Bexar County
Posts: 3,630
These look good, but San Antonio taxpayers should be given another chance to vote for rail. It was rejected eight years ago, but the new arena was on the ballot as well. Voters where simply overwhelmed. This time around it should be given a greenlight, if it is put on the ballot again.


__________________
2020 S. A. Pop 1.59 million/ Metro 2.64 million/ASA corridor 5 million Census undercount city proper. San Antonio economy and largest economic sectors. Annual contribution towards GDP. U.S. DOD$48.5billion/Manufacturing $40.5 billion/Healthcare-Biosciences $40 billion/Finance-Insurance $20 billion/Tourism $15 billion/ Technology $10 billion. S.A./ Austin: Tech $25 billion/Manufacturing $11 billion/ Tourism $9 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2008, 1:09 AM
sirkingwilliam's Avatar
sirkingwilliam sirkingwilliam is offline
Loving SA 365 days a year
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 3,891
I don't understand why a light rail vote hasn't been tried again. In essence, VIA fell off the horse and instead of picking themselves up and getting back on, they crawled to the nearest first aid station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2008, 4:35 AM
alexjon's Avatar
alexjon alexjon is offline
Bears of antiquity
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Downtown/First Hill, Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,340
There's certainly support out there; my grandma thinks BRT is a waste, especially to people like her who had businesses on Fred Road.
__________________
"The United States is in no way founded upon the Christian religion." -- George Washington & John Adams in a diplomatic message to Malta
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 1:25 AM
METALMiKE's Avatar
METALMiKE METALMiKE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 173
http://www.viainfo.net/Contact/EmailContact.aspx

Here is the link to contact VIA.I'm sure if a good amount of people tell them to reconsider light rail that they'll start to get the hint and just might put it on the ballot. :prays:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 1:31 AM
Trae's Avatar
Trae Trae is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
Posts: 4,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul in S.A TX View Post
These look good, but San Antonio taxpayers should be given another chance to vote for rail. It was rejected eight years ago, but the new arena was on the ballot as well. Voters where simply overwhelmed. This time around it should be given a greenlight, if it is put on the ballot again.


Awesome plan, but I seriously doubt it happens. A re-vote needs to happen in SA. All of Texas' cities need light rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2008, 2:51 AM
Dom"n"Converse's Avatar
Dom"n"Converse Dom"n"Converse is offline
Hmmm....
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 159
I wish they'ed use the venue tax to fund a light rail system. Just a celluloid dream for a city like S.A.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2008, 6:14 PM
METALMiKE's Avatar
METALMiKE METALMiKE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 173
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2008, 6:54 PM
Trae's Avatar
Trae Trae is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles and Houston
Posts: 4,510
Why do they say proven success in Los Angeles, Toronto, and Cleveland? Those three cities have at least heavy rail and/or light rail in addition to the BRT. SA's system would just be BRT. In fact, LA wants to convert their BRT's not to LRT because the BRT's don't hold as much capacity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2008, 8:47 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
That ECT presentation is a joke - the first two of their "success stories" are anything BUT; Boston HATES the Silver Line and Honolulu ended up abandoning their BRT experiment (as like with the Silver Line and most other BRT implementations, they ended up with no or little dedicated runningway despite early promises it'd be "just like rail").

San Antonio's talking about 50% at the beginning, which means based on experiences with other drop-offs from promise to implementation, they will probably actually have a negative amount of dedicated space, if that were even possible.

BRT and Rapid Bus are jokes - don't fall for them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > San Antonio
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.