I do not believe this to be true. Austin wasn't even the leader in May (or anytime before or since) - The city was not offering a penny in incentives. Austin would have welcomed HQ2 with open arms - but, it was not going to give them any freebees. Combined, New York, Northern Virginia and Nashville are providing Amazon $2.4 billion in incentives for new offices being placed in those cities.
And I'm pretty darn sure Austin didn't simply say "no thank you" to Amazon because they knew about the local expansions by Apple and Oracle. Why would you shun 50,000 jobs over 35-40,000 fewer ones (combined)? However, I can believe Austin would have worked harder to lure those expansions over HQ2 because the incentive packages for Apple and Oracle would pale in comparison to what it would have taken to land Amazon.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Last edited by GoldenBoot; Dec 14, 2018 at 6:26 PM.
|