HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9501  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2020, 1:18 AM
Niftybox Niftybox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: California
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA21st View Post
Just a plan for now, but I think you're gonna see a few towers around 475 feet.

https://urbanize.la/post/fox-studios...re-development
Oh yeah back in 2016, Century City and the surrounding area were just babies! That proposal might be dead, no rumblings for quite some time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9502  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2020, 1:39 AM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,892
Not necessarily It's a long term plan. I never saw anything that would stop it.

It would likely be used for entertainment companies, and there doesn't seem a slow down for that space.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9503  
Old Posted Jul 1, 2020, 11:25 PM
RST500 RST500 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 514
I'm impressed with all the ongoing proposals in LA taking into account talk fo an urban exodus and economic forecasts. It could just be that the amount of wealth in LA's favored quarter is enough to keep that particular area economically viable.

SF has not scene any new highrise proposals that I'm aware of since the pandemic;
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9504  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2020, 3:38 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
Ridin' into the sunset
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA21st View Post
Not necessarily It's a long term plan. I never saw anything that would stop it.

It would likely be used for entertainment companies, and there doesn't seem a slow down for that space.
I would expect significant changes to the plan as it was drawn up in 2016. The property still remains in the hands of the Murdoch family, and it's primary value is still in real estate, but that plan to add more offices likely won't move forward any time soon given the type of companies they would have targeted at the time have all inked deals around town in pretty high-profile developments. The latest article on this is from 2019.

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-...319-story.html
__________________
"Then each time Fleetwood would be not so much overcome by remorse as bedazzled at having been shown the secret backlands of wealth, and how sooner or later it depended on some act of murder, seldom limited to once."

Against the Day, Thomas Pynchon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9505  
Old Posted Jul 2, 2020, 8:30 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
Speaking of 5411 Wilshire, the developer has put up a website with updated renderings. The project is now called The Mirabelle.



Looks like they've lowered the total amount of parking from 548 spaces to 477, and shrunk the parking podium. Compare these new renderings to the older ones:

The project looks much better as a result. This is gonna be beautiful!

https://5411wilshire.com/
I attended the virtual presentation/public forum and the developer mentioned that he expects that this will be one of the most 4 or 5 expensive buildings in LA. Not sure why that surprised me, but it did.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9506  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 5:00 AM
pwright1's Avatar
pwright1 pwright1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,242
Pico and Figueroa above ground now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9507  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 5:02 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 2,837
Thank you for the update but in the future remember to post DTLA project updates in the DTLA City Compilation thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9508  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 5:44 AM
Niftybox Niftybox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: California
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy View Post
I attended the virtual presentation/public forum and the developer mentioned that he expects that this will be one of the most 4 or 5 expensive buildings in LA. Not sure why that surprised me, but it did.
It's quite expensive for the relatively small size of its footprint I guess. So what do you think are the chances of this huge project being approved without major changes such as to the height, overall size, shape etc?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9509  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 5:58 AM
Niftybox Niftybox is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: California
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwright1 View Post
Pico and Figueroa above ground now.
Love this project, that place will always be packed along with Circa. Prime real estate going vertical adding plenty of density to the chain of towers from DTLA. Another project across the streets needs approval and it's quite a bit taller I believe. I'm also itching for 925 S. Figueroa to get approval, or at least hear something about it, that's one of my favorite designs downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9510  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 4:31 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 4,347
Is there a thread for the Pico and Fig. tower? Can't seem to find it, and that's still a 500+ correct?

Quote:
I'm also itching for 925 S. Figueroa to get approval
Yea that'd be awesome. What's the status on 1045 Olive?

There are a lot of cool proposals in LA but they seems to just drop off the face of the planet and never be heard from again.
__________________
Dump Trump 2020
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9511  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 10:14 PM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 2,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niftybox View Post
It's quite expensive for the relatively small size of its footprint I guess. So what do you think are the chances of this huge project being approved without major changes such as to the height, overall size, shape etc?
I think he meant in terms of consumer cost, not construction cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9512  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2020, 10:17 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illithid Dude View Post
I think he meant in terms of consumer cost, not construction cost.
Yes, it was in regards to how much apartments will cost.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9513  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2020, 9:32 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Is there a thread for the Pico and Fig. tower? Can't seem to find it, and that's still a 500+ correct?
This isn't the correct thread, but Fig + Pico is a two-tower project (both hotels). The 42-story building will rise 529 feet, the 25-story 326 feet.

EDIT: Created a thread.

https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=243050

Last edited by Quixote; Jul 4, 2020 at 10:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9514  
Old Posted Today, 7:03 PM
112597jorge 112597jorge is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LA/OC
Posts: 369
4 Highrises planned at the North Hollywood Metro center

https://urbanize.la/post/environment...lywood-station
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.