HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #801  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2019, 7:24 PM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Edgewater, Chicago
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyg View Post
I've started seeing ads for apartments at the Essex, when will residents start moving in?
Pretty sure they already have
     
     
  #802  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 11:27 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,449


Bow down to the greatest street wall in the world
__________________
I'm here for a long time, not a good time
     
     
  #803  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 2:35 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Team Alinghi
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,296
Kamin: "A tall order of metal and glass 'meh'"
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...321-story.html

ouch!
     
     
  #804  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 2:49 PM
Skyguy_7's Avatar
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,173
^Kamin = a pompous, elitist clown. His job as a critic is obviously to complain about EVERYTHING and I just hate complainers. The laymen are grateful for this nice addition to the greatest streetwall in the world!
     
     
  #805  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 2:49 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Kamin: "A tall order of metal and glass 'meh'"
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...321-story.html

ouch!
Kamin is generally an idiot, totally disagree.
     
     
  #806  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 3:20 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 734
Kamin is not and idiot and he is not an elitist. I don't agree with everything he says (haven't read this review yet), but his writing kept Daley from building an abysmal victory column at Wacker & Michigan (Roman, or neoclassical - IN ALUMINUM!), he was scathing in his review of the 1st iteration of the Trump tower, which was a bad design, and his Pulitzer Prize winning series of articles about the south lakefront are terrific, and I think pushed forward the discussion about how woefully inadequate access to the Lakefront was. His concerns about Lincoln Yards mirrors what many on this forum have said. He is spot on about City Front, which informs his concern about LY.

Now, he was wrong bout the Lucas Museum and other things issues where I disagree with him.
     
     
  #807  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 3:25 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Loop, Chicago
Posts: 618
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
Kamin is not and idiot and he is not an elitist. I don't agree with everything he says (haven't read this review yet), but his writing kept Daley from building an abysmal victory column at Wacker & Michigan (Roman, or neoclassical - IN ALUMINUM!), he was scathing in his review of the 1st iteration of the Trump tower, which was a bad design, and his Pulitzer Prize winning series of articles about the south lakefront are terrific, and I think pushed forward the discussion about how woefully inadequate access to the Lakefront was. His concerns about Lincoln Yards mirrors what many on this forum have said. He is spot on about City Front, which informs his concern about LY.

Now, he was wrong bout the Lucas Museum and other things issues where I disagree with him.
Do you have any pictures? I've never seen it.
     
     
  #808  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 3:31 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 734
I have been looking. Will post when I find. It was just silly, especially in it's execution.
     
     
  #809  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 4:10 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 20,926
^ is this the early iteration you're thinking of?

__________________
He has to go.
     
     
  #810  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 4:12 PM
Steely Dan's Avatar
Steely Dan Steely Dan is offline
devout Pizzatarian
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lincoln Square, Chicago
Posts: 20,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
Kamin is not and idiot and he is not an elitist. I don't agree with everything he says (haven't read this review yet), but his writing kept Daley from building an abysmal victory column at Wacker & Michigan (Roman, or neoclassical - IN ALUMINUM!), he was scathing in his review of the 1st iteration of the Trump tower, which was a bad design, and his Pulitzer Prize winning series of articles about the south lakefront are terrific, and I think pushed forward the discussion about how woefully inadequate access to the Lakefront was. His concerns about Lincoln Yards mirrors what many on this forum have said. He is spot on about City Front, which informs his concern about LY.

Now, he was wrong bout the Lucas Museum and other things issues where I disagree with him.
agreed.

i don't always agree with kamin, but i am always curious to read his opinions.
__________________
He has to go.
     
     
  #811  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 4:32 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 734
Yes to the Trump. Just so blocky looking. It wasn't horrible, just bad. Smith when back to the drawing board and came up with a much better tower.

I was looking for the victory column, which seems to have been thrown on the ash heap of bad design.
     
     
  #812  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 7:48 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
Kamin is not and idiot and he is not an elitist. I don't agree with everything he says (haven't read this review yet), but his writing kept Daley from building an abysmal victory column at Wacker & Michigan (Roman, or neoclassical - IN ALUMINUM!), he was scathing in his review of the 1st iteration of the Trump tower, which was a bad design, and his Pulitzer Prize winning series of articles about the south lakefront are terrific, and I think pushed forward the discussion about how woefully inadequate access to the Lakefront was. His concerns about Lincoln Yards mirrors what many on this forum have said. He is spot on about City Front, which informs his concern about LY.

Now, he was wrong bout the Lucas Museum and other things issues where I disagree with him.
Agreed with this. He'd done this city a great service. Like others have said, I don't always agree with him, like his latest review of the ORD finalists' entries. His reasoning was a bit simplistic, imo, considering the complexities.

Sometimes his reviews do come across as a bit "pompous" but often times I think he was just in a "cranky" mood and took it out in his column.
     
     
  #813  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 2:51 PM
Suiram Suiram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 49
I think Kamin's problem is likely his required volume of content. He has certainly created some well crafted pieces and provided a valuable critical contribution. But maybe he just needs to create too much filler which winds up like hot takes.

He's like one of those talking heads on ESPN. Could be good for valuable insight if given weeks, months to think and consider it. But having to go on TV every night leads to drivel.

On parking podiums, I think we all have to accept basement parking is impractical for now. I wonder if a more practical incentive might be to encourage wrapped parking like 465 N park. Obviously not every site is big enough to be practical, but you could provide a simple zoning incentive like excluding any wrap from the FAR. Obviously that could be abused in theory (I dont think the obvious abuse would pencil...eg, 40 stories of parking wrapped in units).

Actually you could do quite a few games. Include 1st floor parking in FAR (or Double the value), exclude any useable space on say 2 through 5 that wraps parking. Or even the simplest would be to include above ground parking in FAR which would make developers think harder about how much parking they need and what the cost of going underground is.
     
     
  #814  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 4:25 PM
chicagodeckerdude's Avatar
chicagodeckerdude chicagodeckerdude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Portland
Posts: 20
Ive never been a huge fan of the green glass myself...but that's just something I don't enjoy that much. I do like that original design better. But that's what is cool about architecture....everyone sees it their own way...just like musical tastes are unique to each individual
     
     
  #815  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2019, 4:34 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,389
also, its silly to suggest all Kamin does is complain or that hes just some ivory tower curmudgeon. he has plenty of glowing reviews for things he thinks were executed well. those just dont get the same sort of traction here. i agree with him and his opinions far more than i dissent.

frankly, our city is exceedingly lucky it has a full time architecture critic with a large mouthpiece at all to keep these sorts of topics in the public discourse. and to me thats far more valuable than the actual opinion on A vs B.
     
     
  #816  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2019, 6:36 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,836
     
     
  #817  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2019, 7:08 PM
RedCorsair87 RedCorsair87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 233
^Is that NYC or Chicago? Love it! More like this please. Maybe in an orange glass
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:06 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.