Quote:
Originally Posted by blacktrojan3921
What exactly happened in the East End? And why does it have a bad rep?
|
Quote:
Saskatchewan Construction Association - Board of Directors 2012
President:
Michael Fougere, SCA
306-525-0171
|
There is blatant conflict of interest here. Fourgee has been a Executive at SCA while holding a Council seat for many years. That type of stuff would not stand in Toronto where I go to school you would have to step down from that post.
He is deep in the builders/development scene. Now there is nothing wrong with development but its a blatant conflict of interest as you sat as Ward head when cheap land in the East End came on line and a fire sale of crap development came to follow. You need a Mayor whom will foster strategic and long term development, not sell the Barn for a quick penny.
The East end is a mess, aside from the Residential stuff, Forugee was mostly arm-twisting the IMO unsustainable large tract Commercial constructs that we have present there. Each new project siphons of its predecessors and now al l you have is a ghost trail or for lease signs in the oldest developments.
Fiacoo and Fourgere we're needed to get Regina out of its Coma but now that its awake you need a somebody whom is going to think of things strategically to keep things going. The CP yards and the old Mosiac site for instance could end up a mess of crap, or a long term project which ends up being something the City can be proud of.
Fourgere would equal East end style development all over the City as the SCA does not know anything else. Its MO is quick and cheap - They just want projects going they don't care what the end goal of what get built is as long as shovels are in the ground.
Fourgere is a the safe choice for people whom don't Regina to steer ahead and become a progressive City, a model for the rest of Canada. We are at a fork in the road where we can steer ahead with our growth and not make the same typical mistakes that Cities like Calgary have made.