HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #181  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2008, 4:25 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #182  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2008, 8:28 AM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
I know it's not much, but i hope you enjoyed. if I have time once I'm finished exams, and before vancouver, i'll go around and take a few more. Next time from some of the mountains, so you all can appreciated the vast sprawl.
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #183  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2008, 4:44 AM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
Oh, and from the city website you can see their ideas for what a redeveloped downtown would look like.
it's good stuff!

http://kelowna.ca/CM/Page1313.aspx
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #184  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2008, 3:59 AM
Phil McAvity Phil McAvity is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 3,618
Thanks for all those pics Wisla, they were great!

Kelowna always breaks my heart though. If only the city had put all the mid and high-rises together, Kelowna would have a really nice little skyline but it's so spread out, there really is no skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #185  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2008, 8:52 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
New resort attempts to thaw building freeze

rendering here: http://media.bclocalnews.com/images/...3_20080425.jpg

Architect’s conceptual rendering of the Aqua development in the Mission with three towers and a boardwalk.
Contributed

Promises to return a coveted section of foreshore to the public realm helped The Mission Group make their first dent in a city-imposed moratorium on new development in the South Pandosy area this week.

Slated for a six-lot space beside Manteo and the Eldorado Hotels, Mission Group’s plans for “Aqua” include a three-tower residential resort skirted by public beach and boardwalk.

The developer promises to revitalize the foreshore, return it to the city and landscape the property with plazas, parks space and marsh.

The proposal won over the city’s Advisory Planning Commission Tuesday night. The APC gave the project their seal of approval despite a directive from city council to curtail high-density development in the area.

Last fall, the city’s planning staff told council the area has nearly reached the maximum capacity under the Official Community Plan, and analysis of how much existing roads, sewers, water systems and so on can withstand is needed before any new projects proceed.

City planners are not to support development variances or rezonings “beyond four storeys for commercial and residential development,” or “six storeys for apartment hotels” until the OCP review is completed late next year—placing Aqua’s proponents squarely in the crosshairs of the city’s bureaucracy.

“We’re not asking for more density. The density is the same. It’s a matter of where you put it,” said Aqua architect Rick Hulbert, of West Vancouver’s The Hulbert Group.

The site is zoned to accommodate the type of residential resort envisioned, but rather than carpet the property in a six-storey block, The Mission Group wants to build three towers—19, 15 and 17 storeys—in order to make space for more landscaping.

If allowed to proceed, the finished project would culminate in an “animated” park with public access corridors from the beach through the surrounding neighbourhood, connecting the shoreline with the Mission Park Greenway.

“We want a lot of people (in the area),” said Hulbert, noting shops and retail space encrust a platform of above-ground parking on which the towers sit.

The boardwalk would be six metres wide at the narrowest point and lead into a 150-metre dock limited by the depth of the lake to 60 to 70 slips at the end.

The developers hired fish biologist Darryl Arsenault and are in talks with both the B.C. Ministry of Environment and the city’s environment division on the shoreline restoration and dock, with plans to use a groyne—a low barricade described as a tool to restore natural balance—to ensure the area does not have to be dredged annually as it is today.

“The area is not a fish spawning, fish bearing or fish feeding area,” said Randy Shier, Mission Group partner.

“So from a fish point of view, it’s not valuable habitat.”

The project is named for its location, with promises to draw on an aquatic colour scheme in the renderings.

“We believe this particular location is the premier resort site in the city, if not the province,” Shier told the commission on Tuesday, noting it’s rare to have a six-acre site on the water within the city.

Their concept caught the eye of local development proponent Duane Tresnich, who told commissioners he believes “the area is starting to become rundown.”

“Reject the calls of those people who wish to turn the clock back and move Kelowna forward,” said Tresnich, who runs an advocacy group dubbed Move Kelowna Forward.

But Aqua faces more than bureaucratic resistance.

Leading the charge, diamond miner Charles Fipke said he’s concerned about the environmental impact the development would have on the lake and his adjoining property.

“A lot of residents really don’t want to see another Waikiki,” said Fipke, who purchased his home in the area two years ago.

He’s since been offered $1.2 million more than the purchase price—presumably by one of three developers currently working within the neighbourhood—but said he turned the offer down to protect the area’s wildlife.

Echoing Fipke’s concerns was Canadian EarthCare Society president Lloyd Manchester and animal advocate Sinikka Crosland, with The Responsible Animal Care Society (TRACS).

Both of them told the APC that the area’s wildlife is at stake should the Aqua project be greenlighted.

The two captured the ears of commissioners Janet Digby and John Welder, both of whom voted against the project.

“I don’t think the height is the most appropriate thing here,” said Digby.

“I know you talked about curves and that’s an interesting concept, but that could be anywhere, anywhere in the world,” she said nodding to the architect’s images, which draw on the curve of sailboat spinnakers for inspiration.

Digby didn’t buy the environmental benefits trumpeted in the presentation.

“What’s really coming back? A little beach access?” she said, adding the dock is ultimately to add a bunch of “stinking boat motors” onto the lake.

In an interview following the APC meeting, Shier said he believes what won the majority of commission members over was that they listened to the public before coming forward with the proposal.

Initial designs called for one 30-storey tower, but were reduced after extensive public consultation including three open houses and meetings with special interest groups.

“As a developer, you’d think you sort of understand all the issues, but when you actually talk to people who live there, they really do have insight that you may not think of,” he said. “If you look at the Eldorado boat yard, there’s not a stitch of green.

“There’s oil tanks, there’s gravel—it’s boats.

“We’re reclaiming that. It will almost feel like a park-like setting.”

Aqua has yet to make it to city council, the body with the authority to approve or deny the developer’s application.


http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/18168139.html
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #186  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2008, 3:13 AM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
I really hope that gets built. I saw a better rendering, but i don't remember where.
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #187  
Old Posted May 6, 2008, 5:05 PM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
FUCKING JOHN ZEGER
I hate this man so much. So, so, so, so sooooooooooooo much.

I wish I had posted his original complaint from a few days ago, in which he got a whopping 600 signatures against the downtown redevelopment plan.


http://castanet.net/edition/news-sto...43--.htm#39143
Quote:
Council to revisit Downtown Plan
by Wayne Moore - Story: 39143
May 6, 2008 / 5:00 am

Kelowna City Councillor, Brian Given, all but accused his fellow Councillors of pandering to the electorate.

Given stormed out of Council Chambers near the end of Monday's meeting, shortly after Council agreed to look into a review of Kelowna's Downtown Plan.

"What I witnessed here this afternoon Your Worship, it must be an election year coming up, and I'm disappointed," said Given prior to walking out.

Council voted to have staff report back on how much it will cost, what resources would be necessary and what other projects may be impacted by doing a review of the Downtown Plan.

The request was made as a few dozen Kelowna residents who want the Downtown Plan revisited before a controversial Downtown Revitalization Plan, which focused on a four block area of the downtown core, is looked at.

Strategic Planning Manager, Signe Bagh, told Council a review of any kind could hamper other projects involving an already understaffed planning department.

"Staff resources have been fully allocated to other projects through the 2008 budget process," says Bagh.

"Providing staff resources to support and oversee consultants undertaking an update to the plan would require re-directing staff from current projects or delay completion of other projects, such as the official Community Plan Review."

Given, the only Councillor to speak out in favour of the four block Revitalization Plan, says he is against anything that takes away from the OCP review.

"The OCP in my mind is the priority here. That update has to be put first," says Given.

He says the CD Zone, which accompanies the Revitalization Plan, was designed to compliment the Downtown Plan.

"Council directed staff to take the Downtown Plan as it sat with all of the ideas and guidelines in it and incorporate that into the current CD Zone that is being proposed. To turn around now and say you want the whole Downtown Plan re-developed in that process, I agree with Mr. Mattiussi, the OCP should come first."

Council, in asking staff to look into a review, was concerned about the height of buildings and the density it would create.

The current Downtown Plan, endorsed in 1999, calls for buildings no taller than 12 to 14 storeys, with none of those along the Abbott Street corridor.

The CD Zone, which borders Abbott to Water streets and Harvey to Queensway, would allow for buildings as high as 26 storeys.

The original proposal was for buildings as high as 30 storeys.

Mayor Sharon Shepherd says there have been as many as 15 developments brought to the planning department, both inside and outside the proposed CD Zone, which include buildings as high as 30 storeys.

"I'd like to get a handle on either saying to any of the developers out there that are outside this present CD Zone, keep in the plan as it is today and let us evaluate the CD Zone. If it doesn't go anywhere then I think that will then set the tone for what we are looking at for the bigger vision," says Shepherd.

"If we are going to move ahead, I would like to know what the height and density calculations should be."

Meantime, Councillor Barrie Clark, told Council he felt it was time to slow down and take a deep breath before moving forward.

"I don't see any harm in all of us just saying hang on, let's wait a bit and make sure we get it right," says Clark.

"Listening to my fellow Councillors, I just felt we were rushing at a speed that we should not be and that we should just take a deep breath. If Council wants a lot more information before making a decision, that's fine with me."

Clark says the pressure Council is feeling is due to the CD Zone, which will be coming before the City within the next couple of weeks.

"It's going to make my decision a lot easier if I have this other information. So, why don't we just take the very difficult decision and say, because of staffing problems and other pressures, because of the OCP which we agree has top priority, we are not going to deal with the CD Zone as rapidly as we would like."

Staff is expected to come back with recommendations within the next two to four weeks.
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #188  
Old Posted May 7, 2008, 12:17 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,536
I really hope they don't screw the pooch regarding downtown's revitalization. I'm especially surprised to see how many residents care about these plans considering they probably NEVER go downtown. They* should concentrate on Orchard Park's expansion or something more relevant to their lifestyle.


*They as in retired folk. Who else would find the time to sign such a bizarre and counterproductive petition?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #189  
Old Posted May 22, 2008, 2:23 AM
hollywoodnorth's Avatar
hollywoodnorth hollywoodnorth is offline
Blazed Member - Citygater
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 6,120
looks like downtown Kelowna is getting an American Apparel store

Kelowna
Downtown − 41 Bernard Ave. Coming Soon
__________________
Quote of the Decade on SSP: "what happens would it be?" - argon007

"orange vested guy" - towerguy3
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #190  
Old Posted May 22, 2008, 2:48 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,147
oh yay they can get leotards and neon shirts now
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #191  
Old Posted May 23, 2008, 2:30 AM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
Here are some photos I took today...new camera...more on my Flickr page ( new page lol ):

http://www.flickr.com/photos/vitc/













Digital Zooms...




















Normal again...


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #192  
Old Posted May 23, 2008, 5:08 AM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
Nice!

Here's some more stuff on Aqua:

http://www.aquaresort.ca/
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #193  
Old Posted May 23, 2008, 10:59 PM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
A new crane was being assembled today at the Grand for the casino - parking - retail expansion. I don't have any details of the projects though. Here are some photos...

Grand Crane...













Downtown...









Waterscapes close up photos...













Lucaya close up photos...









Madison...














Other in area...




Last edited by vitc; May 24, 2008 at 3:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #194  
Old Posted May 23, 2008, 11:08 PM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
I'm stoked for Madison. It's gonna be a nice building.
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #195  
Old Posted May 24, 2008, 3:37 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,536
I didn't realise Madison was UC. It's going to be a great addition to Kelowna's skyline.

What are the heights of Lucaya and Watermarks?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #196  
Old Posted May 24, 2008, 3:50 AM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
21 Lucaya
26 Skye - Waterscapes ( damn, I wrote watermarks -duh! )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #197  
Old Posted May 24, 2008, 4:20 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is offline
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,536
^Nice! So Kelowna has three towers UC over 20 floors? Or is Madison 18 floors?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #198  
Old Posted May 24, 2008, 6:44 AM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
I believe Madison is only 16 floors but it is a beauty. Behind that are 2 more towers that might go up ( 18 - 21 i think ) but i have not heard much about them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #199  
Old Posted May 24, 2008, 11:05 PM
wisla_krakow's Avatar
wisla_krakow wisla_krakow is offline
Sebastian
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,725
Which ones are you talking about?
__________________
My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #200  
Old Posted May 28, 2008, 1:14 AM
vitc's Avatar
vitc vitc is offline
mAd cRaZy CoDeR
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kelowna, BC
Posts: 357
Madison crane going up today so I took some photos plus a few other things. More on my Flickr Page

Click for bigger version...













Grand Expansion Crane Assembled...





Nice Library Shoot...





Canary Lofts...





Condos on Ellis...









Aberdeen Apartments ( I believe )... ( Harvey [ hwy 97 ] and Ethel )







Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:20 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.