HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7021  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 1:37 AM
masonh2479 masonh2479 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: AUS/ATW
Posts: 1,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
We have already handled 3 simultaneously. Curious if we can handle 4. Also curious if we can handle a 380. Probably so since we can handle a 74.
Don’t quote me on this but I thought a while back when the expansion was still under construction it was made clear that we have two A380 capable gates. I would imagine if an A380 ever did get scheduled the port would install a jet bridge to reach the second level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7022  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 1:46 AM
Austin1971 Austin1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by masonh2479 View Post
don’t quote me on this but i thought a while back when the expansion was still under construction it was made clear that we have two a380 capable gates. I would imagine if an a380 ever did get scheduled the port would install a jet bridge to reach the second level.
p

Last edited by Austin1971; Jan 23, 2020 at 4:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7023  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 2:06 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
Perhaps we would might get a 1x flight for SXSW or F1 with a 380 but I doubt it. I'm just wondering about diverts from IAH and DFW.....
I don't believe the diverts would be on the ground long enough to merit letting passengers disembark so we may never see a 380 parked at the terminal. But it would be so cool to see one parked next to our puny 737s, or should I say, a 737 would look puny next to a 380.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7024  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 2:22 AM
Austin1971 Austin1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by the genral View Post
i don't believe the diverts would be on the ground long enough to merit letting passengers disembark so we may never see a 380 parked at the terminal. But it would be so cool to see one parked next to our puny 737s, or should i say, a 737 would look puny next to a 380.
i

Last edited by Austin1971; Jan 23, 2020 at 4:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7025  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 3:04 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXboom View Post
major East - West US flight route that is above Aus
Is that why there seems to be at least 1 high altitude airplane that can be seen at any particular time when one looks up at the sky? I've always wondered if that was merely how it is everywhere due to how much air traffic there is or if there is a path pattern.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7026  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:32 AM
llintner llintner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXboom View Post
Source?? Gov and Wikipedia says Austin 210K and San Antonio 160K. I’m sure some of the tower operators that work both both can comment further. I know the SA guys are always shocked by the air traffic over Austin. Both in terms of operations and the major East - West US flight route that is above Aus
I use the FAA Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS). I often cite San Diego for operational comparison because it's a one runway airport with more traffic than AUS.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7027  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:39 AM
llintner llintner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
Can the international gates handle 4 widebodies at the same time? Thanks
In the current configuration, only three Group V (B747, B777, B787, A330, A350) aircraft can be worked simultaneously. The flights we have coming this May will result in two arriving in the 1400 time period and two arriving in the 1600 time period on some days. A tough day will be when they all operate and both of the earlier flights run late.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7028  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:53 AM
llintner llintner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILUVSAT View Post
Apologies, Mr. Lintner.
No problem.

The "T" gates were actually a temporary designation. We did that primarily because of the gate management software. We knew when the "stingers" were installed use of those gates would overlap with both the legacy gate numbers they replaced, and the future gates that would be built in the expansion.

Fun fact, the architect originally designated the new expansion gates as E1-E12 starting at what is now Gate 11, going clockwise around the building. Concern was that kind of designation would only confuse passengers, driving the decision to renumber the entire terminal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7029  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 5:01 AM
llintner llintner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin1971 View Post
We have already handled 3 simultaneously. Curious if we can handle 4. Also curious if we can handle a 380. Probably so since we can handle a 74.
If you look on the ground in the Gate 2/4 area, you will see a dashed lead-in line. That space has been measured out as a place an A380 could be placed. Those two bridges could get to the lower L1 and L2 doors. Unfortunately, the only push-back tug on property that may have enough power to push that airplane back is at Cargo. EK carries a tower with them, LH does not. Not sure about QA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7030  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 5:36 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,432
Its always great to have an insider join and educate us on this thread llintner. Welcome.

Last edited by the Genral; Jan 20, 2020 at 2:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7031  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:05 PM
Austin1971 Austin1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 827
Quote:
Originally Posted by llintner View Post
in the current configuration, only three group v (b747, b777, b787, a330, a350) aircraft can be worked simultaneously. The flights we have coming this may will result in two arriving in the 1400 time period and two arriving in the 1600 time period on some days. A tough day will be when they all operate and both of the earlier flights run late.
t

Last edited by Austin1971; Jan 23, 2020 at 4:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7032  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:40 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by llintner View Post
I use the FAA Air Traffic Activity System (ATADS). I often cite San Diego for operational comparison because it's a one runway airport with more traffic than AUS.
Thanks for clarifying which airport. The abbreviations get my wires crossed since we are mostly talking about cities / not airport codes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7033  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 4:43 PM
ATXboom ATXboom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
Is that why there seems to be at least 1 high altitude airplane that can be seen at any particular time when one looks up at the sky? I've always wondered if that was merely how it is everywhere due to how much air traffic there is or if there is a path pattern.
Yes... follow flight tracker data and you see a major air highway running east/west over Austin. I grew up on Toledo - same thing there across the northern US. My neighbor was a tower operator - always said his main job was managing overhead traffic, not departures and landings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7034  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 6:29 PM
Tyrone Shoes Tyrone Shoes is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 400
Airline/Airport Codes

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATXboom View Post
Thanks for clarifying which airport. The abbreviations get my wires crossed since we are mostly talking about cities / not airport codes.
Airlines are usually referred to with two letters:
Southwest - WN
United - UA
American - AA

Airports usually referred to with three letters:
AUS - Austin
DAL - Dallas Love
HOU - Houston Hobby

My old girlfriends/ex-wife referred to with FOUR letters
__________________
Good night Austin Texas where ever you are..." Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7035  
Old Posted Jan 20, 2020, 6:52 PM
We vs us We vs us is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Shoes View Post
Airlines are usually referred to with two l

My old girlfriends/ex-wife referred to with FOUR letters
*rimshot*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7036  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2020, 11:51 PM
austlar1 austlar1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 3,432
Delta gives all employees a two month pay bonus! Dang! https://www.kvue.com/article/money/b...i1KX9uix3aWuMI
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7037  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 12:31 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,432
Quote:
Originally Posted by austlar1 View Post
Delta gives all employees a two month pay bonus! Dang! https://www.kvue.com/article/money/b...i1KX9uix3aWuMI
Oh really!! Well my company gave all its employees a $100 bonus for Christmas just like last year and the year before that. So stick that Delta empl…….oh wait, my company sucks cheap dick!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7038  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2020, 1:19 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
American, Delta, United, and Southwest all do some form of profit sharing with their flight attendants. Spirit does not. My roommate is getting a $7k check this year.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7039  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 2:09 AM
freerover freerover is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,275
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7040  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2020, 2:38 AM
llintner llintner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Awesome photo!

The angle suggest the photo was taken from the current Air Traffic Control Tower, looking at what is now Gates 14-16. The area covered in decking would be the roof and concourse level at Gates 14 and 15, with the beginning of the eyeball and high ceiling partially framed. The exterior elevator/ exit stair structure at Gate 16 isn't up yet. Middle of the photo is the parking admin building with the Spirit of Texas overpass in the background.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:06 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.