HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 7:30 AM
Labroco's Avatar
Labroco Labroco is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 768
The parkade

While parking is required in the area, is no one concerned about the size of a 600 car garage? Lily street has a chance to become a great pedestrian area! It's very important to ensure there is a strong ground level retail or commercial component in this location. No one wants a concrete wasteland.

The garage will be going to public tender. It is not guaranteed to the pump house proponents although they speak as if it is. Not really sure they should have first dibs on 250 stalls. It's a provincial asset and parking should be available to all of the stakeholders of the area equally.

As for Wanda Koop ...

She and her work will be remembered long after we are all gone. She speaks for many in the area. Wanda has been all over the world and has seen and been in many innovative places and spaces. Her voice is very important.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 8:47 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winnipeg Architect View Post
She owns a dumpy warehouse behind Argyle School in Point Douglas.

The old Wiper Building at 72 Henry. She paid $100,000.00 for it.

She is not even close to the Waterfront Area.

Just another typical Winnipeg NIMBY.
as much as I disagree with koop here, you are 100% wrong on her wiper building. it's an amazing remnant of a neighbourhood destroyed for the Disraeli "freeway" and other renewal plans.

my pic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 5:13 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by urb View Post
Your statement is only partially accurate. You are both uninformed and misinformed on the subject.
Since you either are Ms. Koop or an advocate for her please enlighten us on how someone with a relativity small investment in an area can become the spokesperson and director of what development can and cannot occur.

PS No slight on Ms. Koops actual work she is a fine and highly talented artist, but leave urban planning......
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 5:50 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is offline
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labroco View Post
Lily street has a chance to become a great pedestrian area!
Really?

Lily? Currently it backs into a Hydro Substation, and serves as access to the underground parking for the Sky Condos.

I am not sure that little stretch of "street" has much potential for anything to be honest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 6:01 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,461
why would the parkade be a provincial asset?....I doubt it will go to public tender...it will be just like the chipman parkade...hand over the cash.

Ms. Koop favours a park with a reflecting pool and an organic grocer somehow woven around massive industrial machinery.....her arguments are completely unrealistic...she only opposed a tower....she has no great vision for what could be realistically done.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 6:09 PM
urb urb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Since you either are Ms. Koop or an advocate for her please enlighten us on how someone with a relativity small investment in an area can become the spokesperson and director of what development can and cannot occur.

PS No slight on Ms. Koops actual work she is a fine and highly talented artist, but leave urban planning......
I am not her.

I do live in the neighbourhood, have had numerous conversations with her, been inside her national wiper building & know for a fact that the previous statement that I quoted is inaccurate and misinformed for a number of reasons.

I do not think that a third party discussion about her real estate holdings in detail, on a forum is respectful or appropriate. People deserve privacy & I wouldn't want random people discussing where my studio is, my home is, my investment property is, etc…. and that is why I didn't simply correct the previous statement in detail.

Also I DO NOT agree with her stance on how the neighbourhood should be developed, but residents are entitled to organize and have their say.
In previous posts I have essentially stated that the proposed 24 story tower is probably THE BEST THING FOR THE NEIGHBOURHOOD and have been a proponent from the start.

Just felt it was a correction that deserved to be made.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 6:38 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by urb View Post

I do not think that a third party discussion about her real estate holdings in detail, on a forum is respectful or appropriate. People deserve privacy & I wouldn't want random people discussing where my studio is, my home is, my investment property is, etc…. and that is why I didn't simply correct the previous statement in detail.
.
I'll have to agree/disagree with this point.
She has gone public. Websites, petitions, rallying those to her view/cause, very political, outspoken using the media to further her beliefs on what should/should not have been done.

When you enter this domain a person will be subject to scrutiny, who is this person? What is her expertise on the issue?. What stake does she have in this? Personal? Financial? .etc..

The architects/designers of this project will undergo the same scrutiny, and why not? Are they experienced ,dependable, what projects have they completed in the past ? What stake do they have in the development? Well obviously profit in this case, as it should be.

I will agree she should be respected, as much as any poster on this forum.

Let's end the discussion on her and keep to the proposed project at hand.
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2014, 10:00 PM
urb urb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post

Let's end the discussion on her and keep to the proposed project at hand.

Agreed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 12:56 AM
Labroco's Avatar
Labroco Labroco is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 768
Pump house

Quote:
Originally Posted by urb View Post
Agreed
I am new at this.

I love the imput and dialogue but do believe some have a larger interest in the matter than others. If one lives in Osborne village for example should their voice and opinion be equal to the person next door to the development?

If someone has no investment in the area and another has $10,000,000 is that of consequence? I would say yes.

The parkade land is owned by the province. If they part with it there must be an expression of interest. The size of the project and parkade is overwhelming to many in th area. We just want things to slow down a little to ensure things are thought out. The impact of a mistake are huge!

Thanks...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 1:15 AM
rypinion's Avatar
rypinion rypinion is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East Exchange, Winnipeg
Posts: 1,396
There are also some who live right next door who are all for this development.

I, for one, have visualized a tall tower coming out of the pumphouse right from the day I moved into Sky in early 2010. I was quite surprised when there were people expecting something different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 1:51 AM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
There are also some who live right next door who are all for this development.

I, for one, have visualized a tall tower coming out of the pumphouse right from the day I moved into Sky in early 2010. I was quite surprised when there were people expecting something different.
I'm moving into District Condos on James next summer. I support the Pumphouse development. I want more life on James - lots of it. I want it to feel like Bamnatyne does with people in the streets, patios etc. And I'd like improved parking.

So this is not my backyard (front actually) today, but it will be tomorrow. It's important for people to understand it is supported by many. We're just hearing the those opposing it right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 3:25 AM
Bluenote Bluenote is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Winnipeg / St Vital
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labroco
We just want things to slow down a little to ensure things are thought out. The impact of a mistake are huge!

Thanks...
This city with all its internal fighting and red tape???? Taking our time ???? This area has sat vacant for ever. How much more time would you like? This city needs to clear the slow lane to progress and speed it up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 3:35 AM
ctochico ctochico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by rypinion View Post
There are also some who live right next door who are all for this development.

I, for one, have visualized a tall tower coming out of the pumphouse right from the day I moved into Sky in early 2010. I was quite surprised when there were people expecting something different.
In in sky and I'm all for it. Of course the tower doesn't affect my view, so that's maybe one reason I'm all for it, of course the parking lot wouldn't be much of a view anyway, but anything that can bring people downtown, I'm down with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 3:41 AM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 25,881
the slaming of wonda koop needs to stop now.........



people like wonda koop help build what we know as winnipeg via the arts community

ever herd of art city? ...........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 7:36 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
the slaming of wonda koop needs to stop now.........



people like wonda koop help build what we know as winnipeg via the arts community

ever herd of art city? ...........
No one is slamming the work Ms. Koop has done or what she brings to the arts community.

People can slam her overly sexist remark or her views on the exchange, this is an open forum for discussion or are certain topics or individuals immune?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 8:40 AM
armorand93's Avatar
armorand93 armorand93 is offline
Transit Nerd
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Calgary (former Winnipegger)
Posts: 2,707
...so just wondering, has anyone noticed increased pedestrian activity around the Chinatown/Logan area since that new mid-rise housing block popped up over the past year or so? I haven't been back around there since Scream 2012 down at Pumpanga... so I wanted to ask.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 2:24 PM
DonaldSmith's Avatar
DonaldSmith DonaldSmith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wpg, Mb
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by armorand93 View Post
...so just wondering, has anyone noticed increased pedestrian activity around the Chinatown/Logan area since that new mid-rise housing block popped up over the past year or so? I haven't been back around there since Scream 2012 down at Pumpanga... so I wanted to ask.
I work in the area I haven't noticed much. The bulldozing of the buildings across the street and the Shanghai Building didn't help much. Maybe once that lot gets developed things will improve. But by then the Public Safety building will be empty, so that will be a drain on the area too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 2:45 PM
ctochico ctochico is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by armorand93 View Post
...so just wondering, has anyone noticed increased pedestrian activity around the Chinatown/Logan area since that new mid-rise housing block popped up over the past year or so? I haven't been back around there since Scream 2012 down at Pumpanga... so I wanted to ask.
doesn't help when its -a gazillion degrees out there either....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 3:42 PM
Winnipeg Architect Winnipeg Architect is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labroco View Post
While parking is required in the area, is no one concerned about the size of a 600 car garage? Lily street has a chance to become a great pedestrian area! It's very important to ensure there is a strong ground level retail or commercial component in this location. No one wants a concrete wasteland.

The garage will be going to public tender. It is not guaranteed to the pump house proponents although they speak as if it is. Not really sure they should have first dibs on 250 stalls. It's a provincial asset and parking should be available to all of the stakeholders of the area equally.

As for Wanda Koop ...

She and her work will be remembered long after we are all gone. She speaks for many in the area. Wanda has been all over the world and has seen and been in many innovative places and spaces. Her voice is very important.
She is no Warhol and her voice is all negative and if she had any money maybe she would put up a few million for the Pump House.

All talk....................blah blah blah
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2014, 5:34 PM
DowntownBooster DowntownBooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenote View Post
This city with all its internal fighting and red tape???? Taking our time ???? This area has sat vacant for ever. How much more time would you like? This city needs to clear the slow lane to progress and speed it up.
It was the same thing with the Eaton's site when it was announced a new arena was to be built there. No one came forward with any alternatives until they found out an arena was to be built. Anyone notice how none of the ideas that came up for the Eaton's building have come up for The Bay? Some people just object to any new buildings because they don't like change or don't like a tall building because it will block sunlight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:09 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.