Posted Jun 17, 2008, 2:43 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,701
|
|
Very true. And perhaps - sadly - it needs to be somebody of that legislative stature who has to have a loved one run over before they are willing to crack down on crime in terms of harsh punishment. It would be pretty heart breaking, but perhaps a local legislator needs to have tragedy strike close to home before he or she comes to realize what kind of pain and suffering can be prevented.
And on this note, if I have to read one more story about the rogue couple that is Sel Burrows and his wife, I will go nutty. I understand their intentions are good, but their methods are just due-left of the counterculture. His wife wants to have thieves be put to work repairing vehicles and then take that repaired vehicled into a destruction derby to ruin his work, and this is supposed to be "punishment". Wow! As for Mr. Burrows, he pretends to buy crack-coccaine from local dealers, negotiates a price and then walks away and wonders why trouble finds him. Does this not sound crazy to anybody else but me? ...I suppose if any verification is needed, Gordon Sinclair thinks these two are real trail blazers.
Another sad case in point, is that jogger who got hit by a speeding, uncontrolled stolen vehicle in River Heights last year, and our system had the gall to say, "well, he probably shouldn't have been running on the street." Perhaps not, but is that really even an issue when the fabric at hand consists entirely of grand theft auto. We blame the victim. It's beyond rediculous.
A wise man once told me, "People may say that harsh punishment is not a way to deal with crime, but you certainly don't ever see the military out of order."
I apologize for turning this into a bit of a rant, but we've been trying to hug criminals and tell them to run along and be good boys and girls for far, far, far too long.
|