HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2019, 4:58 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,561
Dallas will be number two. It has the least amount of encumbrances; natural disaster, high prices, high heat, intense nimbyism, tax unfriendly....texas is the new California without the progressive politics and lower prices.
__________________
Portland!! Where young people go to retire.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2019, 9:03 PM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
crisis actor
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: STL
Posts: 10,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan View Post
"no one" is an awfully strong statement.

our building has a small front yard (all of about 350 SF of grass), and since our back "yard" is just a small patio tucked in between the back decks and the parking pad on the alley, our kids actually do play in our front yard all the time.

it's not uncommon at all to see children playing in the front yard/sidewalk/parkway in my neighborhood. backyards are either so tiny or non-existant (and chopped up with fences anyway) that the front of the buildings is usually the largest open space for kids to run around, ride scooters, toss a football, splash around in a wading pool, build a snowman, etc.
yeah front “yards” do serve a purpose...helps with a tree canopy which is wildly important in a hot summer climate. if you’ve ever lived in sfh/row with just a front door stoop to the sidewalk the street noise can be annoying...coughing, talking, cars...i mean its not terrible but can be annoying. in walkups and euroblocks its less of an issue.
__________________
t h e r e is no C h a o s.... . . . only g r e a t E n e r g y
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 1:07 AM
Sun Belt Sun Belt is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Envy of the World
Posts: 4,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by bossabreezes View Post
Even though maybe not the best urban feature, yards do serve a purpose: they absorb water. They are very important in subtropical and tropical places that have high rainfall.

Otherwise, flooding can be a really big issue. In São Paulo, there are some neighborhoods with little area for absorption. This coupled with torrential summer storms and steep hills = streets turning into waterfalls that can sometimes take cars down with them.

In the neighborhoods with yards, this almost never happens.
That's a good point. In arid regions, storm runoff is a big issue. Instead of precious rain waters replenishing aquifers, it's channeled out to sea, or in inland areas, it evaporates before it can percolate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 1:22 AM
jtown,man jtown,man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 2,590
I should have been more specific.

This:
https://www.google.com/maps/@36.8651...7i16384!8i8192

or this:

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.8568...7i13312!8i6656
is not this:

https://www.google.com/maps/@36.8328...7i13312!8i6656



Trust me, I didn't get a ground-level apartment because of noise. I understand the issues. I don't think its weird Americans don't prefer Philly style row homes but I think front yards, overall, are too large. As far as actually using their yards, most people prefer privacy, you don't get that in the front yard. Also, more backyards are fenced than front yards, so people are more likely to trust their kids running around there or their dogs. Point? People use their backyards more, we all know this. Most people anyways. So the huge football field front yard makes zero sense to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 4:19 PM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdxtex View Post
Dallas will be number two. It has the least amount of encumbrances; natural disaster, high prices, high heat, intense nimbyism, tax unfriendly....texas is the new California without the progressive politics and lower prices.
They need to create more to be the 'new' California. Poaching companies and workers makes you a cheap alternative, it doesnt make you California.
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 5:05 PM
Sun Belt Sun Belt is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Envy of the World
Posts: 4,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
They need to create more to be the 'new' California. Poaching companies and workers makes you a cheap alternative, it doesnt make you California.
I don't think it has to be one or the other. California and Texas will most likely remain population and economic powerhouses.

Texas definitely has the space to continue to grow rapidly this century.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 5:19 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
ψ Sailor of the Mind ψ
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: New Jersey - Somerset County
Posts: 31,220
^^^^^

Too much size. The state is bigger than France.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 5:54 PM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
They need to create more to be the 'new' California. Poaching companies and workers makes you a cheap alternative, it doesnt make you California.
Agreed. It's like all those place calling themselves Hollywood of the South, North etc Or Silicon Praires, Alley, etc. It's never going to be the same.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 6:33 PM
iheartthed iheartthed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 3,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimondpark View Post
They need to create more to be the 'new' California. Poaching companies and workers makes you a cheap alternative, it doesnt make you California.
Industry poaching is actually another characteristic of the Sun Belt. California has done its fair share of it (especially L.A.), but nothing like the scale of the newer Sun Belt destinations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 6:57 PM
pdxtex's Avatar
pdxtex pdxtex is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,561
Californians leaving California seem to think Texas is the next best thing. That was their top destination last year. Of the nearly 700k people who left, 10 percent ended up in Texas. Business also sees the writing on the wall as more and companies move their headquarters and large office dependent operations. I read somewhere genentech laid off about 300 workers in the south bay. Guess where 300 new genentech workers magically ended up? Portland , two floors below me where office space is a third of bay area prices....
__________________
Portland!! Where young people go to retire.

Last edited by pdxtex; Nov 10, 2019 at 7:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 7:31 PM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,842
This stuff always gets blown out to fit certain poster's narratives.
So out of 40 million people, 70,000 people moved to Texas? Whats 700,000 out of 40 million?
Whats the percentage of these things?

If you listen to certain "media" you would believe these numbers would be MUCH HIGHER than they actually are. As Diamondpark stats showed, Texas didn't even gain 1 more percent of job growth for this decade than California.

I believe Idaho was the first choice for Californians's, if you go by percentage.

Last edited by LA21st; Nov 10, 2019 at 7:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 8:25 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 26,547
Depends on what time frame those 700,000 left. If it's within a year, that's a lot even for California's population. If it's over a 5-10 period, not so much of a big deal.

RE: Idaho v. Texas, I would imagine Californians who pick one over the other do it for very different reasons. ID strikes me as a destination for more well-to-do Californians who reject CA's 'liberalism' or looking for slower pace of life where as Texas is just an affordable alternative regardless of politics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 8:31 PM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,842
It was for one year, but 500,000 moved in from other states too.

Texas, New York and Florida also had 450,000 people move out last year. By percentage,Florida and New York have more people leave than california.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 10:15 PM
Plasticman Plasticman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 232
I think the listed cities will grow but the real emphasis in the next decade will be on the 2nd tier of cities. Nashville, Charlotte, & Austin are already beginning to siphon off projects and construction that a couple of decades ago would never have considered them in the running. As an example Nashville scores huge with part of the Amazon expansion. Twenty years ago Atlanta or Dallas or Houston would have easily scored it. My point is instead of one of the historically larger cities continuing exponential growth many companies are looking to these second tier cities as having more potential.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2019, 10:45 PM
goat314's Avatar
goat314 goat314 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St. Louie
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA21st View Post
It was for one year, but 500,000 moved in from other states too.

Texas, New York and Florida also had 450,000 people move out last year. By percentage,Florida and New York have more people leave than california.
I've been living in Florida on and off the last 15 years. Livability has gone down dramatically in the state (specifically in the larger metros). The infrastructure hasn't kept up with growth and the cost of living is rising exponentially. I don't know what it's like to live in Texas, but I'd imagine population will start to head to less populated sunbelt states in the future. Florida will definitely no longer be a bargain in the next 10 years or so. All they are building is overpriced, overcrowded apartment complexes now and people under 40= are so broke that I'm sure another housing bubble is on the way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2019, 1:49 AM
dimondpark's Avatar
dimondpark dimondpark is offline
Pay it Forward
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Piedmont, California
Posts: 7,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA21st View Post
Agreed. It's like all those place calling themselves Hollywood of the South, North etc Or Silicon Praires, Alley, etc. It's never going to be the same.
And if you notice, the current tech streaming trend is still largely centered in California for the most part. That's where the creativity is.
__________________

"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference."-Robert Frost
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2019, 3:15 AM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 26,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by goat314 View Post
I've been living in Florida on and off the last 15 years. Livability has gone down dramatically in the state (specifically in the larger metros). The infrastructure hasn't kept up with growth and the cost of living is rising exponentially. I don't know what it's like to live in Texas, but I'd imagine population will start to head to less populated sunbelt states in the future. Florida will definitely no longer be a bargain in the next 10 years or so. All they are building is overpriced, overcrowded apartment complexes now and people under 40= are so broke that I'm sure another housing bubble is on the way.
Similar scenario to bigger metros here in Texas. New houses not in the exurban hinterlands are expensive as are multifamily development. You can still find a cheap house or apartment in the city but they are going to be older, in need of some repair and/or on the 'wrong side of the tracks'.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2019, 4:41 PM
Sun Belt Sun Belt is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Envy of the World
Posts: 4,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA21st View Post
It was for one year, but 500,000 moved in from other states too.

Texas, New York and Florida also had 450,000 people move out last year. By percentage,Florida and New York have more people leave than california.
Wait, what?

List of U.S. states annual net domestic migration.

1] Florida -- 132,602
2] Arizona -- 83,240
3] Texas -- 82,569
4] North Carolina -- 66,991
5] South Carolina -- 50,775
6] Nevada -- 47,596
7] Washington -- 46,549
8] Colorado -- 43,293
9] Georgia -- 41,914
10] Tennessee -- 39,952

-----

Here's the negative net domestic states:

24] Vermont −62
25] District of Columbia −936
26] Wisconsin −1,011
27] North Dakota −2,379
28] Rhode Island −2,639
29] Missouri −2,790
30] Iowa −2,886
31] Nebraska −3,314
32] Wyoming −3,686
33] Oklahoma −4,474
34] New Mexico −5,851
35] West Virginia −7,029
36] Virginia −9,831
37] Alaska −10,752
38] Mississippi −10,818
39] Ohio −12,146
40] Hawaii −12,430
41] Kansas −12,564
42] Michigan −16,766
43] Pennsylvania −20,463
44] Connecticut −21,509
45] Maryland −24,518
46] Massachusetts −25,755
47] Louisiana −27,914
48] New Jersey −50,591
49] Illinois −114,154
50] California −156,068
51] New York −180,306



And here's the top 3 states Net International Migration:

1] Florida 175,670
2] California 117,797
3] Texas 104,976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2019, 4:44 PM
Sun Belt Sun Belt is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Envy of the World
Posts: 4,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by goat314 View Post
I've been living in Florida on and off the last 15 years. Livability has gone down dramatically in the state (specifically in the larger metros). The infrastructure hasn't kept up with growth and the cost of living is rising exponentially. I don't know what it's like to live in Texas, but I'd imagine population will start to head to less populated sunbelt states in the future. Florida will definitely no longer be a bargain in the next 10 years or so. All they are building is overpriced, overcrowded apartment complexes now and people under 40= are so broke that I'm sure another housing bubble is on the way.
As overpriced as Florida real estate has become, it's still about 1/3 - 1/5 the price of California depending on city v city location comparisons.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2019, 6:03 PM
LA21st LA21st is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Belt View Post
Wait, what?

List of U.S. states annual net domestic migration.

1] Florida -- 132,602
2] Arizona -- 83,240
3] Texas -- 82,569
4] North Carolina -- 66,991
5] South Carolina -- 50,775
6] Nevada -- 47,596
7] Washington -- 46,549
8] Colorado -- 43,293
9] Georgia -- 41,914
10] Tennessee -- 39,952

-----

Here's the negative net domestic states:

24] Vermont −62
25] District of Columbia −936
26] Wisconsin −1,011
27] North Dakota −2,379
28] Rhode Island −2,639
29] Missouri −2,790
30] Iowa −2,886
31] Nebraska −3,314
32] Wyoming −3,686
33] Oklahoma −4,474
34] New Mexico −5,851
35] West Virginia −7,029
36] Virginia −9,831
37] Alaska −10,752
38] Mississippi −10,818
39] Ohio −12,146
40] Hawaii −12,430
41] Kansas −12,564
42] Michigan −16,766
43] Pennsylvania −20,463
44] Connecticut −21,509
45] Maryland −24,518
46] Massachusetts −25,755
47] Louisiana −27,914
48] New Jersey −50,591
49] Illinois −114,154
50] California −156,068
51] New York −180,306



And here's the top 3 states Net International Migration:

1] Florida 175,670
2] California 117,797
3] Texas 104,976
Obviously, I didn't mention net migration. Not sure why these things are so hard to understand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:16 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.