HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


    Central Park Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • New York Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
New York Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1121  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2013, 2:29 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris08876 View Post
I wouldn't be pessimistic, either way something good is going to happen. Shit, even if they decide to make it 1,250ft, lets not complain. Even 1000, still amazing. Whatever is economically viable will get built. Unlike China, we build on demand and efficiency, not height and title. It will be a jewel nevertheless.

Yea definitely true, a 1250 foot building with a good design is nothing to complain about.

Knowing that there could have been a 500 meter building in NYC was just crazy exciting though, although I always had my doubts.

At least 432 park avenue broke the roof height of 1WTC, we are heading in the right direction.
     
     
  #1122  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2013, 3:54 AM
antinimby antinimby is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In syndication
Posts: 2,098
From what that guy said about it being similar to the Equinox tower and Chicago Trump Tower, I think I know what it'll look like.

Did someone ask him if the roof will be flat or pointy?
     
     
  #1123  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2013, 1:03 AM
fastdupree fastdupree is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Yea definitely true, a 1250 foot building with a good design is nothing to complain about.

Knowing that there could have been a 500 meter building in NYC was just crazy exciting though, although I always had my doubts.

At least 432 park avenue broke the roof height of 1WTC, we are heading in the right direction.
Yeah! I feel the same about it. Now I can put my attention to 432 Park 100%. It is the most exciting thing going on in NY right now!
     
     
  #1124  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2013, 4:34 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
The old building is gone.













     
     
  #1125  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 6:08 PM
King DenCity's Avatar
King DenCity King DenCity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: With Your Pancakes :|
Posts: 507
I hope the truth will be revealed soon. :|
     
     
  #1126  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 6:45 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Barnett was bragging about how he'd have the cities highest building and it will now be third tallest on the street alone. Weird huh?
     
     
  #1127  
Old Posted Sep 9, 2013, 6:49 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Barnett was bragging about how he'd have the cities highest building and it will now be third tallest on the street alone. Weird huh?
Barnett didn't brag about anything. At most, he was discussing plans for what was being planned at the time. He's stated his buildings weren't about height, but design, and he also said he didn't think this would end up as tallest. I don't know how you get "bragging" out of that.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1128  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2013, 4:51 AM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 965
He did get short-sticked though. Too bad, tis still my favorite proposal.
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
     
     
  #1129  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2013, 5:35 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Barnett didn't brag about anything. At most, he was discussing plans for what was being planned at the time. He's stated his buildings weren't about height, but design, and he also said he didn't think this would end up as tallest. I don't know how you get "bragging" out of that.
Bragging may not have been the right word but he was definitely very confident about having 1550 solid feet to the top floor with no spire or anything, they also said it would be one of the "worlds tallest buildings" in a recent article and now it won't even be the top 5 in NYC soon enough.

I'm still happy about 1250 feet of course but still. He could have had it all, those top penthouses would have made bank but I'm sure he has his reasons why not to build them.
     
     
  #1130  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2013, 10:09 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Bragging may not have been the right word but he was definitely very confident about having 1550 solid feet to the top floor with no spire or anything, they also said it would be one of the "worlds tallest buildings" in a recent article and now it won't even be the top 5 in NYC soon enough.
Don't pretend to be dense. You yourself have quoted the articles, so I know you've read it. Gary Barnett said he did not think the tower would end up as a tallest, and you know what the articles are a reference to. And his reference to the "1,550 ft" height was the planning at the time, not "bragging". And eve now you don't know what the height of the building is.



Quote:
Originally Posted by fimiak View Post
He did get short-sticked though.
Explain.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1131  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 1:19 AM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NA - Europe
Posts: 6,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYguy View Post
Don't pretend to be dense. You yourself have quoted the articles, so I know you've read it. Gary Barnett said he did not think the tower would end up as a tallest, and you know what the articles are a reference to. And his reference to the "1,550 ft" height was the planning at the time, not "bragging". And eve now you don't know what the height of the building is.





Explain.

no gil,

I'm not "pretending to be dense" I'm simply saying he seemed to do a lot of flip flopping about the height, the articles are all contradictory.
     
     
  #1132  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 2:18 AM
Onn Onn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The United States
Posts: 1,937
I think the height of the tower will end up being okay, but you can't deny that 107 W 57th St. going taller than expected isn't going to give Barnett some pause. In this super high-end market how can you compete with someone your looking up at? Hopefully Extel makes the right decision here!
     
     
  #1133  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 7:24 AM
21bl0wed's Avatar
21bl0wed 21bl0wed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
I think the height of the tower will end up being okay, but you can't deny that 107 W 57th St. going taller than expected isn't going to give Barnett some pause. In this super high-end market how can you compete with someone your looking up at? Hopefully Extel makes the right decision here!
But but..the super rich will pay more for a well designed building over just a tall rectangle!
__________________
Finance books chess engineering space ai. 2018 dump equities buy gold
     
     
  #1134  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2013, 5:39 PM
MrSlippery519 MrSlippery519 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by Onn View Post
I think the height of the tower will end up being okay, but you can't deny that 107 W 57th St. going taller than expected isn't going to give Barnett some pause. In this super high-end market how can you compete with someone your looking up at? Hopefully Extel makes the right decision here!
I agree, this and 432 being taller no matter how you slice it will eat into potential sales. Some of the super rich want to be in the "tallest building in NYC"
     
     
  #1135  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2013, 12:16 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Riverview Estates Fairway (PA)
Posts: 45,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
I agree, this and 432 being taller no matter how you slice it will eat into potential sales. Some of the super rich want to be in the "tallest building in NYC"
Yea I agree with that. Its all about status and bragging rights with the super rich. Not to mention the psychology behind seeing a taller tower and knowing that you live in the 2nd tallest. That 2nd for some bothers them. Its all about being number one.
     
     
  #1136  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2013, 12:22 AM
ILNY ILNY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
I agree, this and 432 being taller no matter how you slice it will eat into potential sales. Some of the super rich want to be in the "tallest building in NYC"
Normally, I would agree with you. However, I do not think this will be the case for NYC. Super luxury market is so hot here that a tower with prime location like Nordstrom will sell out quick whether it is the highest or not.
     
     
  #1137  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2013, 12:53 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
no gil,
I'm not "pretending to be dense" I'm simply saying he seemed to do a lot of flip flopping about the height, the articles are all contradictory.
Well, whatever comprehension may be lacking, I've explained it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSlippery519 View Post
I agree, this and 432 being taller no matter how you slice it will eat into potential sales. Some of the super rich want to be in the "tallest building in NYC"
Look up some of the most expensive sales in Manhattan, you will find not everyone wants to be "up top", or even halfway there. There's a market for being sky high, no doubt about it. But it's not the "end all, be all" of Manhattan real estate.

I notice that another thing some of you seem to overlook is that this is as much a Nordstrom development as Extell's. Extell has the rights to build the residential tower above the store, but the site and the store belongs to Nordstrom. It was Nordstrom that chose the architect here, and a "high quality" development is what Barnett promised them. It will be a very tall building, no doubt. But its not being driven by height. And we'll see exactly what that is when all is revealed.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
     
     
  #1138  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2013, 11:43 PM
supertallchaser's Avatar
supertallchaser supertallchaser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 219
i honestly believe this is going to be an iconic tower no matter what happens. im still thinking the 1550ft plans will be carried out,how can we go from 1550ft with no crown to 1250ft with a crown and a green facade.doesnt add up
     
     
  #1139  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2013, 12:08 AM
-Filipe-'s Avatar
-Filipe- -Filipe- is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 274
Who cares if its 1253 feet, better then a 600 ft tower, or a 300 ft tower, or an empty plot?
__________________
I LOVE NY!
     
     
  #1140  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2013, 12:19 AM
NYC GUY's Avatar
NYC GUY NYC GUY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 575
I still think it will be 1550 or close to that and seriously I know height isn't everything but this would be like tower verre when it got a 200 feet haircut.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.