Environment group questions uranium panel objectivity
Cassandra Kyle, The StarPhoenix
Published: Tuesday, October 21, 2008
A new, 12-person group has been created to advise the provincial government on the development of Saskatchewan's uranium resources, however some are questioning its ability to be objective.
The Uranium Development Partnership was announced Monday in Saskatoon by Enterprise and Innovation Minister Lyle Stewart and Crown Corporations Minister Ken Cheveldayoff.
Richard Florizone, a nuclear physicist and vice-president of finance at the University of Saskatchewan, was chosen to lead the group, which will receive up to $3 million in funding from the Crown Investments Corp.
Members of the partnership include leaders of companies with interests in Saskatchewan's uranium, including Jerry Grandey, the president and CEO of Cameco Corp., Armand Laferrere, president and CEO of Areva Resources Canada Inc., and Duncan Hawthorne, president and CEO of Bruce Power Inc., which is conducting a feasibility study into building a nuclear power plant in the province.
The group also includes representatives from First Nations, urban and rural municipalities, science and the environmental community.
Florizone says the team will be mindful of its mandate to be objective when examining value-added possibilities for the sector.
"I think the best policy or strategy comes when you bring people together from different backgrounds, so I think when you're looking at areas of opportunity to expand that industry you have to have industry at the table -- so I think that's a good fit," he said at the announcement. "We will have our work cut out to bring the different views together around the table, but we look forward to getting to it."
Others view the partnership as a group that wants to promote uranium and nuclear development in the province. Ann Coxworth of the Saskatchewan Environmental Society says a number of people on the panel are from or related to the industry.
"I think it's got a clearly pro-nuclear development mandate and their question is not whether to proceed with development, but how," she said.
She wonders whether the provincial government will give millions in funding -- as it is with uranium -- to groups looking at wind or hydroelectric power advancement. Coxworth said she was invited to be part of the panel but turned the offer down after reviewing the partnership's mandate and concluding she would be uncomfortable with any consensus achieved.
"(The group) might objectively look at a range of options like (enrichment, waste disposal and nuclear energy) and consider which would be the least problematic for the province to look in to, but I don't see that they are mandated to look objectively at whether or not this is the right direction for Saskatchewan to be pursuing in the first place," she said.
Stewart said now is the time to start adding value to Saskatchewan's uranium resources, saying it's the government's goal to expand the industry. The partnership will provide the provincial government with a final report, which will include specific recommendations on value-added opportunities best suited to the development of the uranium sector, by March 31. The report will be released publicly in the spring and form the basis for public consultation on the contentious issue.
"How many areas of the nuclear cycle we can participate in . . . is up for debate and that's part of what the partnership is trying to determine or give us advice on," Stewart said. "But certainly we recognize that we need to add value to our raw resource, so whether that be refining, whether it be upgrading, whether it be a nuclear fuel production facility, whether it be generating nuclear power, whether it be all of these things, that's what we have to determine."
Members of the panel, which Cheveldayoff describes as at arm's-length from the government, were chosen through recommendations with the exception of two, Patrick Moore and Neil Collins, which the province recruited to the team.
Cheveldayoff says the investment in the Uranium Development Partnership should prove worthwhile.
"We see the potential here as enormous and we want to make sure we're not falling behind, we want to make sure we're leading the way given the resources that we have," Cheveldayoff said. "Three million dollars is a lot of money, but we feel its money well spent because the potential is just unimaginable."
ckyle@sp.canwest.com
URANIUM DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP MEMBERS
Ray Ahenakew: Business development adviser at the Saskatchewan Indian Institute of Technology, where he once served as president. Has served as CEO of the Meadow Lake Tribal Council.
Keith Brown: President and founder of Trailtech Inc. in Gravelbourg. Has served as chair of the Saskatchewan Trade and Export Development Partnership. Represents the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce.
Neil Collins: Business manager for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 2067. A 30-year veteran with SaskPower.
Allan Earle: President of the Saskatchewan Urban Municipalities Association. Mayor of Dalmeny.
Richard Florizone: Vice-president of finance and resources at the University of Saskatchewan. Holds a PhD in nuclear physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Jerry Grandey: President and CEO of Saskatoon-based Cameco Corp., the world's largest publicly traded uranium producer .
Jim Hallick: Vice-president of the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities. Councillor for the RM of Keys.
Duncan Hawthorne: President and CEO of Bruce Power Inc. Chair of the Canadian Nuclear Association, director of the Energy Council of Canada and a member of the board of governors of the World Association of Nuclear operators.
Armand Laferrere: President and CEO of Areva Resources Canada Inc., a world leader in nuclear power.
Edward Mathie: Professor of nuclear physics at the University of Regina. Member of the Canadian Association of Physicists, the Canadian Institute of Particle Physics and the Canadian Institute of Nuclear Physics.
Patrick Moore: Chair and chief scientist of Greenspirit Strategies Ltd. in Vancouver, B.C. A co-founder of Greenpeace, former president of Greenpeace Canada and former director of Greenpeace International.
Alex Pourbaix: President -- energy, TransCanada Corp. Responsible for the company's power, gas storage, liquified natural gas and compressed gas businesses.
Source: Government of Saskatchewan
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2008
Source
____________________________
Nuclear debate draws large crowd
Kathryn Willms, The StarPhoenix
Published: Tuesday, October 21, 2008
A packed house of at least 500 listened intently Monday at Third Avenue United Church to alternative visions of the province's nuclear future.
"The nuclear power issue is hot right now," said event organizer Jan Norris. "We just think there needs to be an informed widespread discussion in the community. The only time these sides have been in a room before has been with a whole lot of bureaucrats, very scripted by the government."
Duane Bratt -- a teacher at Mount Royal College in Calgary and proponent of nuclear power -- focused on what he called an ongoing "nuclear revival."
Bratt advocated an expanded role for nuclear power in tandem with renewable resources such as wind and solar power.
Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility, responded by addressing concerns associated with nuclear energy: Safety, waste and terrorism.
He also said nuclear power plants are simply bad investments. He compared the expansion of nuclear energy to the subprime mortgage model in the United States, saying no company will invest in nuclear without federal loan guarantees that see the taxpayers assuming all of the risk.
Bratt conceded all manner of energy generation have inherent risk and emphasized the lack of greenhouse-gas emissions with nuclear power.
It was a diverse crowd with differing opinions. What was common to all was a desire to be educated on both sides of the contentious issue.
Rajesh Saxena says her family in India often come together to debate these sorts of issues.
"I just wanted to hear what they have to say. I make my own mind up though. I weigh the pros and cons," said Saxena.
"I'm trying to balance the academic and the humanistic. I'm not here so much for information but how they're going to say it. Someone can always say something that makes more sense."
kwillms@sp.canwest.com
© The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2008
Source