Quote:
Originally Posted by ScrappyPeg
Seems whenever anyone says anything that's not in favour of Aboriginal this or that - it *has to be racist. But if an Aboriginal, who happens to be in a high profile position, comments on his methods of dealing with the 'white man' - it's justified.
I'm sure that something is included somewhere in the Charter or in one of the signed treaties that does say Cell phone companies owe aboriginals royalties (or whatever) for using their airspace.
|
Because typical reactions to
any news about First Nation communities
are rooted in ignorance and racism. I'm not sure any respectable organization thought Terry Nelson's comments last month were acceptable. (Though, his anger over the pace of land claims is justified. They take a long time to settle, often in the neighborhood of fifteen to twenty years from the submission of a claim to its resolution. All aboriginal claims are historical, that is, they stem from events and agreements that occured in the relatively distant past and involve historical research. The time it takes to research claims properly, plus the time involved in negotiations, litigation, appeals, and so on, all adds up.)
Anyway, there is nothing in any treaty or surrender about cell transmissions, but the way I read the article, the issue is about consent. Anybody know if MTS or other carriers signed agreements to send signals across private or Crown land? This particular issue seems a little frivolous, but I'm curious to see where it goes.