HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 12:04 AM
jetsetter's Avatar
jetsetter jetsetter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Occident
Posts: 424
Neo-Classical architecture from the last 50 years

In this thread I am hoping that we can post examples of Neo-classical architecture from the last 50 years. I will start with two newer examples.

Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center - Washington D.C. (1998)


Schermerhorn Symphony Center - Nashville, Tennessee (2006)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 3:37 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
Michigan Hall of Justice (2002) - Lansing, Michigan - The headquarters for the Michigan Supreme Court, and other state courts.

__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 4:04 AM
Lecom's Avatar
Lecom Lecom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: the Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 12,703
Wow, that's some great stuff. Good thing that not all architects/developers are obsessed with contemporaty styles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 2:24 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is online now
The Vomit Bag.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 44,861
Neoclassical architecture always looks imposing and timeless.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 3:33 PM
johnnypd johnnypd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 638
quite a few examples in this thread on skyscrapercity:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=440816

this is in london for instance:





and of course Dresden:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 3:34 PM
Upward's Avatar
Upward Upward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,047
The Nashville building is incredible! Nothing about it, at least in that picture, makes it obvious that it's new.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2007, 6:02 PM
LostInTheZone's Avatar
LostInTheZone LostInTheZone is offline
Do you like... Huey Lewis
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Phila.
Posts: 3,062
I wasn't sure if I wanted to be snide and post this, but someone else did Dresden...

East Front of the US Capitol, built 1958-1962:



Time article from 1958:

Quote:
The current phase of the struggle began in 1955, when the House passed a $5,000,000 appropriation act (increased in 1956 by $12 million) for the expansion of the Capitol, and tied into it provisions to move the east-front wall 32½ ft. forward, replace its sandstone façade with a marble copy. Supporters of the remodeling said that it would correct an "architectural defect" (the dome overhangs the east portico), repair and halt damages caused by time and weather, make room for 42 new offices, new restaurant facilities, one large hearing room and a tourist-free corridor connecting the Senate and House. Said Architect of the Capitol J. George Stewart (no architect but a former civil engineer): "The Capitol is not a museum. It is the live seat of a great government."
original sandstone columns from the old facade were set up in the National Arboretum:
__________________
"I'm exceedingly pro-growth, but I have to respectfully dissagree. Growth is not the holy grail, smart growth is. Uncontrolled, careless growth which ends up creating problems in the long run is called cancer." -Eigenwelt

Every saint has a past and every sinner has a future.

Last edited by LostInTheZone; Mar 6, 2007 at 6:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 7:43 PM
jetsetter's Avatar
jetsetter jetsetter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Occident
Posts: 424
United States Court House - White Plains, New York (1995)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 9:08 PM
kool maudit's Avatar
kool maudit kool maudit is offline
video et taceo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 13,875
this one is very awkward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 9:58 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 33,694
That White Plains building is awful.

I'd rather have real contemporary styles than approximations of classical styles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 12:08 AM
LMich's Avatar
LMich LMich is offline
Midwest Moderator - Editor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Big Mitten
Posts: 31,745
Yeah, it's a really brutal clash of Neoclassicism and Beaux Arts. Those styles usually work together, well, but for some reason the architect totally hit and missed, here.
__________________
Where the trees are the right height
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 5:49 AM
holladay's Avatar
holladay holladay is offline
Bombshell Vintage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,249
Th White Plains building looks like it could topple off its base. The details and materials are just baaaaad. But that's what happens when you try to design a building to look like it has real brick and stone walls instead of just thin veneers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 6:24 AM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,678
The White Plains building is disgusting.

What are those Dresden buildings, actually? Baroque? Not neo-classical, anyway.

The first three buildings in this thread aren't that great, either. The Reagan buildings is especially clumsy. The one in Nashville is ok.


But christ, I can't get over how bad that White Plains building is.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 6:28 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lecom View Post
Wow, that's some great stuff. Good thing that not all architects/developers are obsessed with contemporaty styles.
yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 6:46 AM
holladay's Avatar
holladay holladay is offline
Bombshell Vintage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,249
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.
yep... pastiche is the new authenticity
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 4:49 PM
tackledspoon's Avatar
tackledspoon tackledspoon is offline
Candy Jail
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 2,943
The Dresden buildings are beautiful, but as BigUC asked, are they actually neoclassical? I'm not so learned in architecture, but I thought neoclassical threw back to roman monumental architecture.
Anyway, none of these other ones really do it for me. Capitol aside, the unfortunately named Reagan building is the most convincing and the least offensive. Nashville isn't offensive, but I could tell right off that it was a new construction. The Lansing and White Plains courthouses are both hideous.
__________________
Colin
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 5:42 PM
jetsetter's Avatar
jetsetter jetsetter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Occident
Posts: 424
Quote:
Originally Posted by tackledspoon View Post
The Dresden buildings are beautiful, but as BigUC asked, are they actually neoclassical? I'm not so learned in architecture, but I thought neoclassical threw back to roman monumental architecture.
Anyway, none of these other ones really do it for me. Capitol aside, the unfortunately named Reagan building is the most convincing and the least offensive. Nashville isn't offensive, but I could tell right off that it was a new construction. The Lansing and White Plains courthouses are both hideous.
I have been liberal with my examples.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 6:10 PM
Exodus Exodus is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,859
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
yes, some are obsessed with ancient rome.

kitsch.
Good thing too, or we would see nothing but silly attempts at being creative and futuristic. Ancient Rome Rocks !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 6:30 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,457
yes, because those are the only two options...

ancient rome does rock...in ancient rome....not in nashville.

ancient roman rocks....

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 7:45 PM
hauntedheadnc's Avatar
hauntedheadnc hauntedheadnc is online now
A gruff individual.
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Greenville, SC - "Birthplace of the light switch rave"
Posts: 13,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
yes, because those are the only two options...

ancient rome does rock...in ancient rome....not in nashville.

ancient roman rocks....
And why not Nashville? Every architecture style started somewhere, but does that mean it should have stayed there and only there? Was art deco inappropriate for New York and Chicago because it started in Paris? Is the only architecture suitable for the modern American city those buildings that look like melted trailers?

"Ancient Rome" architecture just plain works, so why not use it? There's room for variety, and why not use something that has proven its worth?
__________________
"To sustain the life of a large, modern city in this cloying, clinging heat is an amazing achievement. It is no wonder that the white men and women in Greenville walk with a slow, dragging pride, as if they had taken up a challenge and intended to defy it without end." -- Rebecca West for The New Yorker, 1947
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:19 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.