HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2008, 4:06 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Patrick Patrick is offline
Desert Dweller
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,611
NEW YORK | Rockefeller Plaza West | N/A FT / N/A M | 55 FLOORS | 1987 | NEVER BUILT

Rockefeller Plaza West
New York, 1987-1990

(From Gmarch.com)

The management of Rockefeller Center intended to build the last element of the Rockefeller Center complex, its western-facing entrance, on a site on Seventh Avenue, between 49th and 50th Streets and adjacent to Exxon Plaza in Manhattan. The building was to house offices, an educational-technical center for the performing arts, and was to link into the underground concourse network. The project won a Citation from Progressive Architecture Magazine in 1988.

The contrasting models of the modernism, Rockefeller Center and Times Square, form the context for the project, and inform its design. The lessons offered by these visions of the city have allowed for a consideration of the building as an assemblage, the pieces of which resolve the various site conditions, while the whole is both monumental and dynamic, embodying the energy of the modern city.



Four major elements compose the building. A central core pins the building to the site and defines it on the skyline, acting with the RCA Building as a bookend to the Exxon Building. Around this core laminations are placed, creating a condition of rotation which terminates the east-west axis of the complex and creates a new relationship to the Times Square valley to the south. The variety of scales created by these laminations, as well as their irregular composition, allows the building to graft itself onto the existing cityscape. The building is clad in limestone and glass, with metal ornamentation placed on the surface of the stone to articulate setbacks and to shimmer in the sunlight.



A two-tiered podium, stepped toward the west, defines the Seventh Avenue street wall. This surface is covered by electronic signage, and a building entrance is indicated by a tower of light. An irregular configuration is created at the Plaza to the east, resolving ground level site conditions and providing the main entrance to the building.

A portion of the building element facing Times Square is disengaged and transformed into an object made of glass and metal, specially lit at night, hovering over the Square and acting as an agent in its definition. The various incisions formed by the manipulation of the building mass are seen as habitable places to indulge in the fantasy of living in the sky which informs the myth of New York.



The project was subsequently abandoned due to the changes in the marketplace
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2008, 1:25 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
Wow! I had completely forgotten about this one.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2008, 5:16 PM
ethereal_reality's Avatar
ethereal_reality ethereal_reality is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lafayette/West Lafayette IN, Purdue U.
Posts: 16,352
total surprise to me as well.....good find Patrick.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2008, 7:15 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
I remember this one also got good reviews. Typical that it didn't get built. Meanwhile, someone can create a thread for 80 South Street so we can mourn here.
__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2008, 12:51 AM
Aleks's Avatar
Aleks Aleks is offline
cookies, skittles & milk
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,257
I read about this building in a book I found at the library. I didn't like it too much. Although it would've been a tall addition to the skyline.
__________________
...the greatness of victor is equally proportionate to the skill and obduracy of foe...
-Kostof-
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2008, 6:24 AM
Jibba's Avatar
Jibba Jibba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,917
I personally find the buildings of Rockefeller Center to be beautiful as is, and this thing is positively ugly. The "contrasting models of the modernism, Rockefeller Center and Times Square" that "inform its design" leave it confused. This thing just reeks of the late 80s/early 90s to me. Glad to see that this never saw the light of day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2008, 2:33 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 51,900
I think this would have been an improvement over the 6th Avenue monoliths, bringing a touch
of the classic Rockefeller Center back...







__________________
NEW YORK is Back!

“Office buildings are our factories – whether for tech, creative or traditional industries we must continue to grow our modern factories to create new jobs,” said United States Senator Chuck Schumer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 3:53 PM
RLS_rls's Avatar
RLS_rls RLS_rls is offline
▓▒░
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 1,601
Wow what a shame it wasn't built.
__________________
ಠ_ಠ
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2008, 4:29 PM
Fabb's Avatar
Fabb Fabb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Paris
Posts: 9,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilon Doomm View Post
Wow what a shame it wasn't built.
Right.
The boring, squat and boxy thing that was built instead is a disappointment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2008, 2:33 AM
Scruffy's Avatar
Scruffy Scruffy is offline
low-riding
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bronx
Posts: 1,966
That would have been cool. I mean the lehman bros building that was built isn't bad. but this would have been better
__________________
My name is Steve
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.