Quote:
Originally Posted by TechnicalRecession
I'm not sure I am following you, are you saying a hotel could not be taller than a control tower? This is Halifax's airport that has an Alt hotel on the airport grounds and it clearly looks taller than the control tower:
|
I guess you are not following me here; that's okay. Not everyone on here is "airport-inclined."
The air control tower at Halifax is far away from the terminal building. What you see is the ground/apron controllers in the old tower which used to be the old all-in-one tower. The sightlines of ground control there is not impeded by the hotel with regards to airside movements.
Some airports have two or more "towers." They are typically a combination of apron/ground controllers or ground/air controllers. (Halifax here; Calgary; Toronto.) Extreme cases like Atlanta or Denver have multiple apron "towers" along with the usual package. Regina/Saskatoon each has one tower that encompasses both Ground and Air Controllers. ("apron" controllers are not necessary here --- we're still too small.) Moreover, there are multiple comm frequencies for large airports with regards to aprons; ground control and tower, or, "AIR" control. We won't go into PALs, ACCs and Terminal Airspace here.
Okay, I should have stated [above] that buildings are not to be above the sightlines which would be in excess of the AIR controllers' point-of-view. It won't matter if the hotel impedes the GROUND controllers' point-of-view of the airport's non-airside environment.
I hope explanation clarifies this.