HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6881  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 6:17 PM
eskimo33 eskimo33 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: 9th Rock from the Sun
Posts: 158
Drummer, you are not the only one person who strives to ensure all multi-model users are safe. Maybe it is an outlook shaped by using, well, multi-modes of transportation.
At some level, I can understand the current laws do not provide for the best protection for non-automobile. However, this does not justify a flagrant disgread for said laws. As was previously mentioned, petition to change the law. Violating the law does nothing more than ensure entrenchment of viewpoints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6882  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 6:58 PM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,094
I’m not optimistic that Austin’s light rail plans will pass the vote in November. Just look at the history. Is Austin more mentally prepared than it was in 2014 when the last vote failed? Perhaps, but coronavirus and the damage it’s done to not only PT systems worldwide but also city and state budgets have probably put Project Connect on the shelf for many years to come.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6883  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2020, 7:23 PM
LiveattheOasis LiveattheOasis is online now
Bollywood Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Zilker
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
I’m not optimistic that Austin’s light rail plans will pass the vote in November. Just look at the history. Is Austin more mentally prepared than it was in 2014 when the last vote failed? Perhaps, but coronavirus and the damage it’s done to not only PT systems worldwide but also city and state budgets have probably put Project Connect on the shelf for many years to come.
I hope everyone feels like you do and gets out to vote. That said, this is a much better and more supported plan than in 2014, during an election year with Trump on the ballot, it’s a perfect storm to have the right voters out and in support of a proposal such as this.
__________________
I can feel it coming back again ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6884  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:08 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Elon Musk Hints Boring Company will Build Loops in Austin, Texas as Las Vegas Tunnel is Almost Done

Quote:
Boring Company CEO Elon Musk's vision of warping out of traffic will soon come true as the company's first operational tunnel under Las Vegas is almost done while they plan to expand in Austin, Texas.

In a series of tweet posted on Tuesday, Musk said: "Tunnels under cities with self-driving electric cars will feel like warp drive First operational tunnel under Vegas almost done."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tec...stin-texas.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6885  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:35 AM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
I could definitely see Boring Co. helping out with the downtown train tunnel if Project Connect passes in November.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6886  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:58 AM
JoninATX JoninATX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The ATX
Posts: 3,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
I could definitely see Boring Co. helping out with the downtown train tunnel if Project Connect passes in November.
With things kinda going back to normal, Austin needs this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6887  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 4:35 AM
N90 N90 is offline
Voice of the Modern World
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,094
Elon is setting the ATX to be his next home.

Tesla, with SpaceX in nearby McGregor, and now both NueraLink and the Boring Company also in Austin.

That’s all 4 of his companies. Plus he applied for a TX drivers license.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.blo...n-austin-texas
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6888  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 4:59 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Where the lights are much brighter
Posts: 12,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by N90 View Post
Elon is setting the ATX to be his next home.

Tesla, with SpaceX in nearby McGregor, and now both NueraLink and the Boring Company also in Austin.

That’s all 4 of his companies. Plus he applied for a TX drivers license.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.blo...n-austin-texas
He's going to save a lot of money by not paying California income tax.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://twitter.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6889  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:11 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
I could definitely see Boring Co. helping out with the downtown train tunnel if Project Connect passes in November.
But why?

Boring Co just uses a bog standard TBM (tunnel boring machine) they bought from somebody else.

The "innovation" of BC is to use the tunnel for electric cars. But that's not what PC would be doing.

I mean, sure if Musk volunteers to do it for free for good press or civic pride. But since PC actually competes with his business, I wouldn't really expect it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6890  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:20 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
It's hard to believe musk is interested in anything other than private tunnels for Tesla owners. These things can't scale by design. Imagine an on and off ramp on a highway that only supported 1 car every 5 minutes? That's how the elevators to their tunnels work. It's not for the masses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6891  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 2:54 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
I didn't know the BoCo borers were for their cars only, so my mistake. If they'd been standard issue diggers, it would be a good way to partner with its new hometown, good PR, good way to work with what will be a pretty high profile project.

But if it's for cars only, then pffbllbt.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6892  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 9:15 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
I didn't know the BoCo borers were for their cars only, so my mistake. If they'd been standard issue diggers, it would be a good way to partner with its new hometown, good PR, good way to work with what will be a pretty high profile project.

But if it's for cars only, then pffbllbt.
I remember reading early news articles from overeager reporters about how The Boring Co had figured out a way to save tons of time and money that no one else had thus far been able to do. Really all they did was focus on digging smaller tunnels which, to be fair, are much cheaper and faster. The average subway tunnel is 20 ft in diameter while Boring Co is doing 14 ft tunnels.

That's fine if all they ever planned on doing was shooting a few Teslas through it but there's no way Boring Company would have anything useful to offer on Project Connect other than publicity (which would still be great).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6893  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2020, 11:06 PM
Vexal Vexal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 100
The best thing Tesla can do is put inductive car chargers under the roads in their tunnels. This works even better with Austin's traffic. The cars will be stuck in traffic in the tunnels long enough to reach a full charge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6894  
Old Posted Sep 24, 2020, 5:24 PM
ThyPiGuy ThyPiGuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 68
B-Cycle takeover/rebranding has started..



... and perma-bikelanes on Congress Bridge were being painted yesterday! A bit of re-striping happening as well at South Congress/Riverside/Barton Spring intersections. I hadn't ridden over the bridge with the temp lanes up, so have just realized even without them being separated lanes how significant of an improvement this is. Having a dedicated lane over the bridge is a massive improvement and so much safer.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6895  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 4:01 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,588
Cap Metro tweeted this pic last night of the canopy going up over the new downtown station . . . which, turns out, has been under construction THIS WHOLE TIME.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6896  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 4:17 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 551
Chronicle endoresments are out:

CITY PROPOSITIONS
Proposition A (Project Connect): For
Proposition B (Active Mobility): For

For the decades since Capital Metro was formed in 1985, it's been trying to take Austin transit to a next level, and Austin has caddishly refused to commit. We've run out of time and excuses to keep pretending our mobility problems will solve themselves, or that alternatives to a clearly failed roads-first system would not be popular or successful. Many thousands of people who've made Austin their home are aghast that we had the chance 20 years ago to approve a rail system that would be a well-established fixture of urban life right now, and we biffed it. A handful of the exact same people who killed transit then are still trying to kill this much larger and more ambitious plan – one that's scaled to make up that lost 20 years – precisely because it's now So Big. And of course because they'd never use it, because they see driving alone as a civil right, rather than a privilege, let alone as the oppressive burden it actually is to myriad Central Texans. They're, if anything, even more averse to spending money on active mobility – sidewalks, bike infrastructure, trails, as well as important safety and environmental improvements – which they see as recreation rather than transportation. Our city's income segregation, inequitable distribution of infrastructure and access to public services, and still-much-too-large carbon footprint all tell a different story. It's time for us to get going.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6897  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 4:21 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
Cap Metro tweeted this pic last night of the canopy going up over the new downtown station . . . which, turns out, has been under construction THIS WHOLE TIME.

Looking good. Next step is filling in missing double tracking between MLK and Downtown including the Plaza Saltillo station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6898  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 6:25 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 4,482
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Looking good. Next step is filling in missing double tracking between MLK and Downtown including the Plaza Saltillo station.
And completing a few more lines...just sayin'.


But to your point, would double tracking Plaza Saltillo require taking any more of 5th street or would they simply take the on-street parking - or drop-off lane, I guess - beside the station?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6899  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 7:55 PM
urbancore urbancore is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,515
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n..._news_headline

Citizens are being asked to approve the greatest city debt and tax increase in Austin’s history during the worst economic and health crisis for generations. In a city where only a handful of citizens use public transit, Project Connect’s light rail would serve less than 1% of regional mobility with no discernible positive impact on congestion or climate. We are told “we must do something,” but doing the wrong thing is worse than doing nothing — Project Connect is a very destructive, wrong thing.

Prop A reads like a sales brochure, concealing the massive, long-term cost for all Austin citizens. Many incorrectly assume Prop A fully funds Project Connect; It won’t even pay the annual operations and maintenance cost. Using Capital Metro’s numbers and traditional bond funding, Project Connect requires $2,800 a year at minimum on the average property value to fully fund and operate.


Project Connect is based on uncommitted and doubtful federal funding. Austin intends to collect the tax increase regardless. Lack of federal funding almost doubles the local tax cost.

Passing Prop A increases city tax 25% — over $500 annually on the average valued property. It is a tax rate increase. Unlike a bond, its cost rises with yearly appraisals, compounds future tax increases and is perpetual. Light rail wouldn’t run for a decade, or more, but this record tax increase starts this year.

Imposing extraordinary debt and taxes, as so many struggle to survive and businesses face bankruptcy, indicates city leaders are insensitive and out of touch. The economy is shaky and could slide into a depression. It is not the time for oppressive, ineffective tax increases.


Project Connect doubles-down on outdated technology in the midst of a technological mobility revolution. Austin is a progressive, tech-forward community, why go “all in” on a system that would be obsolete before complete?

Over 80% of the cost is centralized, fixed light rail. With the exception of those living near, accessing the train is problematic and time consuming. It’s more practical to drive to your destination. Few people will trade convenience, safety and utility of a personal vehicle for the lost time and inconvenience of public transit. For these reasons, U.S. public transit has declined for several years. Austin’s 2019 transit ridership was less than 30 years ago; after spending about $8 billion in today’s dollars and after the population doubled.

Politics and money provide toxic transit policy. Project Connect “connects” rail corporate interests and developers to a taxpayer funded “gravy train” worth billions. The millions spent on advertising and proponent PACs confirm this. Follow the money.

The pandemic proves riders avoid risky public transit; science confirms it is prudent. Why invest in a system so vulnerable? Work-from-home expansion is permanently reducing commute demand Project Connect hopes to serve. We don’t know the pandemic’s exact impact on public transit, shouldn’t we see how it settles, before taking irreversible risks and committing the future of several generations?


Austin’s work-at-home population has experienced a steady increase of some 500% in the past 20 years to about five times transit’s commuting. This has removed 10 times the number of commuting cars from roads compared to transit. Going forward, work-from-home projections are a minimum of 25%, most removing car commutes. This reduces more congestion and emissions than projected by Project Connect, and taxpayer/renter cost is zero instead of massive light rail costs resulting in continued unaffordability, gentrification and inequity impact on low income.

More marketing than transportation plan, Project Connect is an obsolete concept which results in massive small business destruction, increased congestion/emissions and lane removals. Imagine digging up over a mile of downtown and construction on those major arterials for years.

Media and politicians don’t pose critical questions to Project Connect. Its cost is a concealed guess — expect large overruns. Once approved, tax starts immediately, is permanent and will continue to increase.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6900  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2020, 8:21 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancore View Post
https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/n..._news_headline

Citizens are being asked to approve the greatest city debt and tax increase in Austin’s history during the worst economic and health crisis for generations. In a city where only a handful of citizens use public transit, Project Connect’s light rail would serve less than 1% of regional mobility with no discernible positive impact on congestion or climate. We are told “we must do something,” but doing the wrong thing is worse than doing nothing — Project Connect is a very destructive, wrong thing.

Prop A reads like a sales brochure, concealing the massive, long-term cost for all Austin citizens. Many incorrectly assume Prop A fully funds Project Connect; It won’t even pay the annual operations and maintenance cost. Using Capital Metro’s numbers and traditional bond funding, Project Connect requires $2,800 a year at minimum on the average property value to fully fund and operate.


Project Connect is based on uncommitted and doubtful federal funding. Austin intends to collect the tax increase regardless. Lack of federal funding almost doubles the local tax cost.

Passing Prop A increases city tax 25% — over $500 annually on the average valued property. It is a tax rate increase. Unlike a bond, its cost rises with yearly appraisals, compounds future tax increases and is perpetual. Light rail wouldn’t run for a decade, or more, but this record tax increase starts this year.

Imposing extraordinary debt and taxes, as so many struggle to survive and businesses face bankruptcy, indicates city leaders are insensitive and out of touch. The economy is shaky and could slide into a depression. It is not the time for oppressive, ineffective tax increases.


Project Connect doubles-down on outdated technology in the midst of a technological mobility revolution. Austin is a progressive, tech-forward community, why go “all in” on a system that would be obsolete before complete?

Over 80% of the cost is centralized, fixed light rail. With the exception of those living near, accessing the train is problematic and time consuming. It’s more practical to drive to your destination. Few people will trade convenience, safety and utility of a personal vehicle for the lost time and inconvenience of public transit. For these reasons, U.S. public transit has declined for several years. Austin’s 2019 transit ridership was less than 30 years ago; after spending about $8 billion in today’s dollars and after the population doubled.

Politics and money provide toxic transit policy. Project Connect “connects” rail corporate interests and developers to a taxpayer funded “gravy train” worth billions. The millions spent on advertising and proponent PACs confirm this. Follow the money.

The pandemic proves riders avoid risky public transit; science confirms it is prudent. Why invest in a system so vulnerable? Work-from-home expansion is permanently reducing commute demand Project Connect hopes to serve. We don’t know the pandemic’s exact impact on public transit, shouldn’t we see how it settles, before taking irreversible risks and committing the future of several generations?


Austin’s work-at-home population has experienced a steady increase of some 500% in the past 20 years to about five times transit’s commuting. This has removed 10 times the number of commuting cars from roads compared to transit. Going forward, work-from-home projections are a minimum of 25%, most removing car commutes. This reduces more congestion and emissions than projected by Project Connect, and taxpayer/renter cost is zero instead of massive light rail costs resulting in continued unaffordability, gentrification and inequity impact on low income.

More marketing than transportation plan, Project Connect is an obsolete concept which results in massive small business destruction, increased congestion/emissions and lane removals. Imagine digging up over a mile of downtown and construction on those major arterials for years.

Media and politicians don’t pose critical questions to Project Connect. Its cost is a concealed guess — expect large overruns. Once approved, tax starts immediately, is permanent and will continue to increase.

^^^This is NOT a Biz Journal article. It was an op-ed written by Jim Skaggs & Roger Falk on behalf of their PAC. They are two of this biggest NIMBYS in existence and the bane to progress in Austin.
__________________
AUSTIN (City): 974,447 +1.30% - '20-'22 | AUSTIN MSA (5 counties): 2,473,275 +8.32% - '20-'23
SAN ANTONIO (City): 1,472,909 +2.69% - '20-'22 | SAN ANTONIO MSA (8 counties): 2,703,999 +5.70% - '20-'23
AUS-SAT REGION (MSAs/13 counties): 5,177,274 +6.94% - '20-'23 | *SRC: US Census*
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.