HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7321  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2020, 2:56 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 3,143
I don't have an issue with unproven technology being tested here and there, but you can't build a system entirely dependent on it if it's no proven. That's freeover's point, I think, as well. I shared the hyperloop link because I think it's neat to see the desire and obvious need for mass transit between the metro areas. I think HSR is better, but perhaps Hyperloop could do their own thing down the road for people who want to be there faster. As long as Hyperloop excitement doesn't knock out HSR, I'm fine with it. I don't care. But as it's currently unproven for the purpose of moving large numbers of people between metro areas, I'm weary of depending on it. HSR has decades of history and multiple case studies around the world showing that it actually works.

One thing I've also thought about with Hyperloop is a freight option between distribution centers, etc. Seems like a business case would be tough to build for that alone, but if something like that was incorporated in addition to passengers, it could be cool. Again - not to replace HSR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7322  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2020, 3:35 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,253
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
I don't have an issue with unproven technology being tested here and there, but you can't build a system entirely dependent on it if it's no proven.
I shared the hyperloop link because I think it's neat to see the desire and obvious need for mass transit between the metro areas. I think HSR is better, but perhaps Hyperloop could do their own thing down the road for people who want to be there faster. As long as Hyperloop excitement doesn't knock out HSR, I'm fine with it.
For a system to be considered mass transit, should it not have more capacity than a bus? The Hyperloop system that NCTCOG is advocating being tested in north Texas has a vehicle/vessel capacity around 40 passengers, at most.
Meanwhile the 8 car HSR train will have a train capacity around 400 passengers, 10 times more. And, with longer platforms at the stations, the train could be twice as long with twice the capacity. 20 times more.

Is it mass transit with a capacity of just 40 passengers per train?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7323  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2020, 3:41 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 3,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
For a system to be considered mass transit, should it not have more capacity than a bus? The Hyperloop system that NCTCOG is advocating being tested in north Texas has a vehicle/vessel capacity around 40 passengers, at most.
Meanwhile the 8 car HSR train will have a train capacity around 400 passengers, 10 times more. And, with longer platforms at the stations, the train could be twice as long with twice the capacity. 20 times more.

Is it mass transit with a capacity of just 40 passengers per train?
Is it really only 40 for Hyperloop? I didn't realize that. I suppose the number per trip may not be as much of an issue if the trips are significantly shorter and therefore more often....so if you count passengers per day or something, etc.... either way, HSR is better, in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7324  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2020, 9:49 PM
ATX_21 ATX_21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 6
Broadmoor and McKalla station timelines
https://www.kxan.com/news/local/aust...alla-stations/
Quote:
Project Connect will take about 13 years before it’s complete, but we are already starting to see some changes now.

Approved by voters in November, the massive transit undertaking is starting to inch forward. Capital Metro is already hard at work planning and preparing for two projects that we will see sooner rather than later — the Broadmoor and McKalla stations — both serving north Austin.
Quote:
According to Capital Metro, construction will pick up on the Broadmoor station this winter with completion set for summer or fall of 2022. They are expecting to see about 240,000 boardings a year at this location, and it will replace the current Kramer station which Capital Metro says has experienced issues with parking.
Quote:
The McKalla station will feed into Austin FC’s stadium, and it’s in the design phase with an expected groundbreaking at the end of 2021
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7325  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2020, 7:29 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,253
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by drummer View Post
Is it really only 40 for Hyperloop? I didn't realize that. I suppose the number per trip may not be as much of an issue if the trips are significantly shorter and therefore more often....so if you count passengers per day or something, etc.... either way, HSR is better, in my opinion.
Actually, Virgin Hyperloop vehicle would be less, around 28 passengers max.
https://virginhyperloop.com/
https://thehill.com/changing-america...ccessful-first

FYI, that first 500 meter test run only reached speeds around 105 mph. They will need a longer test track to test higher speeds.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7326  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2020, 6:39 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
Actually, Virgin Hyperloop vehicle would be less, around 28 passengers max.
https://virginhyperloop.com/
https://thehill.com/changing-america...ccessful-first

FYI, that first 500 meter test run only reached speeds around 105 mph. They will need a longer test track to test higher speeds.
So it fits less than a bus. Wonderful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7327  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2020, 7:04 AM
LoneStarMike's Avatar
LoneStarMike LoneStarMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,205
Yeah, it's smaller than a bus, but if you look at the website it says:

Quote:
The passenger of the future will expect direct and on-demand transportation. With Virgin Hyperloop, there are no timetables. Several pods can depart per minute, and the system does not require stops at every station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7328  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2020, 2:44 PM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,253
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneStarMike View Post
Yeah, it's smaller than a bus, but if you look at the website it says:
So in theory to honor on demand unscheduled service, a single person could tie up an entire 28 capacity vehicle and a slot within their tube. How does they ever expect to earn a profit?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7329  
Old Posted Dec 20, 2020, 4:46 PM
Armybrat Armybrat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
So in theory to honor on demand unscheduled service, a single person could tie up an entire 28 capacity vehicle and a slot within their tube. How does they ever expect to earn a profit?
Well, like Uber does for big demand time slots, just jack up the rate for that one ride.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7330  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2020, 1:27 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin | San Antonio | Panni, Italia
Posts: 1,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
So in theory to honor on demand unscheduled service, a single person could tie up an entire 28 capacity vehicle and a slot within their tube. How does they ever expect to earn a profit?
The Concorde of the ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7331  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2020, 6:53 PM
kingkirbythe....'s Avatar
kingkirbythe.... kingkirbythe.... is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
The Concorde of the ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7332  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2020, 10:38 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoneStarMike View Post
Yeah, it's smaller than a bus, but if you look at the website it says:
It will likely operate like that weird people mover in Morgantown. It lets you push a button for where you want to go and then when enough people push the same button it releases a car to go there.

If its only you it makes you wait like 5-10 minutes and will then begrudgingly let you travel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7333  
Old Posted Dec 25, 2020, 6:26 AM
LoneStarMike's Avatar
LoneStarMike LoneStarMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 2,205
For anyone who missed it, Christmas Eve morning on KVUE's Daybreak, Bryce Newberry did a 22-minute segment on how transportation in Austin is evolving as part of KVUE's Boomtown 2040 series.

Link

Includes stories about the airport, as well as upcoming highway/street projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7334  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2020, 9:42 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 377
There are a couple of Cap Metro filings with station locations for new metrorapid lines:

Northeast (Expo) (ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...MI_PLAN_01.pdf)

Southeast (Pleasant Valley) (ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...MI_PLAN_01.pdf)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7335  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2020, 11:12 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxsnail View Post
There are a couple of Cap Metro filings with station locations for new metrorapid lines:

Northeast (Expo) (ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...MI_PLAN_01.pdf)

Southeast (Pleasant Valley) (ftp://ftp.ci.austin.tx.us/ATD_AULCC/...MI_PLAN_01.pdf)
It's interesting that each station is indicated as 90x15. I'm pretty sure that's bigger than the ones today for even the bendy bus 801. Maybe they're just making sure there's RoW clear for any future need (potentially even metrobike stations as well?)

I'm not quite sure what the different shading/crosshatching is on the stations either.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7336  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 3:48 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,620
Anyone want to pick their favored corridor for the next round of high capacity transit? I know we are a long way off but this is an internet message board.

I'd love to see Lake Austin/East 7th or S. Pleasant Valley/Springdale but those might not have the needed density even in 10 years. I know S Lamar/Burnet would be popular but that seems a little redundant with Lamar/S.Congress.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7337  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:06 PM
Novacek Novacek is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Anyone want to pick their favored corridor for the next round of high capacity transit? I know we are a long way off but this is an internet message board.

I'd love to see Lake Austin/East 7th or S. Pleasant Valley/Springdale but those might not have the needed density even in 10 years. I know S Lamar/Burnet would be popular but that seems a little redundant with Lamar/S.Congress.
When ProjectConnect was doing the planning, the first "vision" map had the potential of a spur of the orange line to the North Burnet Gateway/Domain area. That continues to be my vote. It's definitely far enough away from North Lamar (>2 miles) to serve a different population.

By the time we're even considering that (after the first round of project connect and after the rest of Lamar/SoCo) that area could have more people living there than downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7338  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:13 PM
chinchaaa chinchaaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 250
South Lamar is a great next corridor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7339  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:22 PM
atxsnail atxsnail is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
Anyone want to pick their favored corridor for the next round of high capacity transit? I know we are a long way off but this is an internet message board.

I'd love to see Lake Austin/East 7th or S. Pleasant Valley/Springdale but those might not have the needed density even in 10 years. I know S Lamar/Burnet would be popular but that seems a little redundant with Lamar/S.Congress.
Dunno, it seems pretty much like the density on W5/6 & E7 is already there to support BRT. I found the NACTO target density numbers but couldn't figure out what the measurement statistic actually means in order to compare to the east side.

Most of the activity is to the south of where the line would go, but I wouldn't mind if that was the next corridor up. Anything west of MoPac seems like a waste of money until some of those UT/Muni tracts change but I wouldn't complain if Deep Eddy or even Mozarts got connected to the rest of the civilized world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7340  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:34 PM
drummer drummer is offline
World Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Austin metro area
Posts: 3,143
I think North Burnet up to the Domain area and South Lamar.

I do like the idea of an East/West line a la 5th/6th/7th, but I agree that it would need to be west of Mopac. I'm unsure of how far east of 35 would be needed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.