HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive


    Libeskind Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Los Angeles Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Los Angeles Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted May 2, 2009, 1:23 AM
edluva edluva is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,134
^thank you. in a city where many buildings, including residential, are designed specifically for billboards, and where billion dollar megadevelopments attempt to simulate times square in sanitized, inorganic, cosmetic form it's nice to hear some people can have some reservations if at all. LA can be ugly enough without all this aging plastic simulacra and other cheap attempts at being something it is not
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted May 2, 2009, 8:36 PM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,404
Not only that, but when (if) this building is built, if the base is lit up the way it is on the rendering (I'm guessing that's the south side of the building) then I think it will be enough.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted May 2, 2009, 9:30 PM
holladay's Avatar
holladay holladay is offline
Bombshell Vintage
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,249
Billboards can be great features for the city. Look at the entertainment areas of Tokyo, for example. When all the billboards are lit up at night it becomes other-worldly. That said, the podium on this tower is where Libeskind really went wrong. He basically just jizzed out a few X's like he's some kind of architectural Zorro or something and called it a signature building. The article makes some very good points that mega-tower developments aren't really contributing the right kind of variety that downtown LA needs. They are simply too massive at streetlevel. Libeskind's half-witted attempt to address the base of this building is something you would expect from a second-rate corporate design firm that specializes in Shenzhen-type mega-towers.
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted May 4, 2009, 5:39 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeHundred View Post
No. I'd take off about 2 or 3 stories from the base and that's it. It's a nice building. Not every structure in Los Angeles needs to have bilboards all over it.
Woah, woah, I was only talking about South Park and Hollywood. I fully believe that everywhere else, they should be banned.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted May 10, 2009, 9:28 PM
Dream'n's Avatar
Dream'n Dream'n is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 626
Love the design. I believe it could be one of L.A's most iconic.
__________________
I ain't got time to BREED
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted May 10, 2009, 10:01 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,087
Quote:
Originally Posted by edluva View Post
LA can be ugly enough without all this aging plastic simulacra and other cheap attempts at being something it is not
In some places, it already is what you seem to think it isn't. Billboards actually have a small history in Los Angeles going almost as far back as Times Square, particularly Hollywood and Broadway.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Never Built & Visionary Projects > Cancelled Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.