HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7401  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2021, 6:52 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 708
Wasnt there a plan for the city of Austin or The state of Texas to buy the toll roads. I heard it a few years ago but nothing new since then. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/p...226751534.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7402  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2021, 7:24 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone View Post
Wasnt there a plan for the city of Austin or The state of Texas to buy the toll roads. I heard it a few years ago but nothing new since then. https://www.star-telegram.com/news/p...226751534.html
That would be a waste of money. What's wrong with people who use the roads paying for them?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7403  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2021, 10:51 PM
Enghum Enghum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
That would be a waste of money. What's wrong with people who use the roads paying for them?
My main problem with toll roads are

1. General inefficiencies in toll collection. A significant amount of the toll being collected is not going to pay for the road. Technology and administrative costs eat up 30% of collections and then loan interest eat up another significant portion meaning the amount paid for a toll road over the life of the highway is multiples of it just being funded up front.

2. Overly successful toll roads. When a toll road collects much more than the cost to implement then where does that money go? Dropping toll rates means an increase in congestion plus toll authorities like to implement a standard per mile toll rate across a system except for variable express lanes. Generally the more urban area a toll road serves with more constrained right of ways the more money collected. That collected money then gets spent in more suburban areas to expand the system. This basically becomes an urban subsidy for the suburban expansions. Dallas North Tollway south of 635 is a perfect example. That toll road has had minimal investment in the last 20 years but has been extremely profitable. That money that has been collected has been applied to other projects. Locally the express lanes for Mopac will be creating the same problem. The cost of implementation is nowhere near how much money those lanes are going to be making as congestion increases.

3. Walled cities surrounded by toll roads. Toll roads can become a signal or barrier to entry for the working class. Would you consider living somewhere that you expect your toll bill to be hundreds of dollars a month if you make $25,000 a year? Toll roads are beginning to be used in Texas as a way to segregate classes and deny opportunity.

4. Over building of freeways. Haven't you noticed that toll roads go BIG a lot of the time? There is an incentive to induce demand on the toll road and these choices usually leave out local decision making. When the toll authority has the money and says a road should be built they have an early mover advantage vs other funding mechanisms. You also have decision makers at toll authorities using revolving doors to work for road construction companies. It's this vicious cycle where road studies, construction, and decision making for expansion are all done by the same group of people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7404  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 3:09 AM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
That would be a waste of money. What's wrong with people who use the roads paying for them?
The tolls are way over priced. I can take the entire IH35 toll through Kansas for the same money it takes to just get across Austin. The money also doesn't help keep the tolls open during Ice storms. The tolls also entrap much of Austin's less wealthy neighborhoods. Kind of like what IH-35 did to east Austin in the past. Also the tolls are owned by foreign companies so the money does not stay here to benefit the communities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7405  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 5:57 AM
SproutingTowers's Avatar
SproutingTowers SproutingTowers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahealy View Post
So.... let me ask a dumbass question here. What is up with our toll roads? Will 130 & 45 always be a tolls? I am in RR/CP a lot these days and find it absolutely ridiculous how confusing life is if you choose to not use the tolls. Is the plan that it'll be like 1604 in SA?

Currently, it's a nightmare and I hate it.
First, toll roads get built faster. All the current toll roads in Austin got started and completed while the Y (290/71) in Oak Hill has been stuck in limbo trying to get funding and start construction. So far it’s been 30 years in waiting.

Toll roads also have created huge economic growth where has helped Hutto and Cedar Park grow, and businesses grew along side of it. They also run routes to move people around at ease where SH 130 gives an alternative to I-35, SH 45 creates East-West crossovers by avoiding busy streets littered with traffic lights.

As for 1604 on the Northside of San Antonio the managed toll lane plan was removed and replaced by HOV lane. Unlike Austin where TxDOT is stingy with highway funding about $1/2 billion was allocated for this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7406  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 7:23 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,523
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by SproutingTowers View Post
As for 1604 on the Northside of San Antonio the managed toll lane plan was removed and replaced by HOV lane. Unlike Austin where TxDOT is stingy with highway funding about $1/2 billion was allocated for this project.
Are you suggesting TXDOT does not wish to spent $1/2 Billion near Austin recently?
https://communityimpact.com/austin/c...al-texas-news/
raffic moves along the upper decks of I-35 near downtown Austin on Dec. 1. The Texas Department of Transportation is seeking public feedback on a $4.9 billion project to improve the 8-mile stretch of I-35 through downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7407  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 1:45 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,554
Thanks for all the input, guys. In my opinion, it just doesn't work here and is a bit of a boondoggle. if you're like me and drive a lot for work AND are in a grey area with tolls being covered on your milage () it's damn near impossible to smoothly travel on an alternate route up there...a route which isn't a total shit show. I can't help but also think of the huge influx of people/housing we are currently gaining in North/NE/NW Austin with this housing crisis and what that will do for congestion/tolls.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7408  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 2:56 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enghum View Post
My main problem with toll roads are

1. General inefficiencies in toll collection. A significant amount of the toll being collected is not going to pay for the road. Technology and administrative costs eat up 30% of collections
Not even close, CTRMA budgets are available online.

https://www.mobilityauthority.com/up...u%2021-004.pdf

(and of course, most of that "administrative costs" still exist for "free" highways. It's just in TxDot's $5B annual budget black hole).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enghum View Post
and then loan interest eat up another significant portion meaning the amount paid for a toll road over the life of the highway is multiples of it just being funded up front.
So you'd prefer to instead not build the highway for decades while saving up enough money to build it? At which point construction costs have increased so much it costs as much as the interest payments would have been?

At current interest rates it would make no sense not to debt fund as much as you need. Even if you had cash on hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enghum View Post
Generally the more urban area a toll road serves with more constrained right of ways the more money collected. That collected money then gets spent in more suburban areas to expand the system. This basically becomes an urban subsidy for the suburban expansions. Dallas North Tollway south of 635 is a perfect example. That toll road has had minimal investment in the last 20 years but has been extremely profitable. That money that has been collected has been applied to other projects. Locally the express lanes for Mopac will be creating the same problem. The cost of implementation is nowhere near how much money those lanes are going to be making as congestion increases.
So you'd prefer the even greater suburban subsidy of gas taxes (taking money from miles driven on purely local urban roads not on highways) or general funds (taking money from those that don't even drive)?


The urban sections are also much more expensive to construct and maintain. The mopac toll lanes ended up being expensive enough. Just wait until they start (in 15-20 years or so) talking about expanding them again with depressed lanes like I35.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enghum View Post
3. Walled cities surrounded by toll roads. Toll roads can become a signal or barrier to entry for the working class. Would you consider living somewhere that you expect your toll bill to be hundreds of dollars a month if you make $25,000 a year? Toll roads are beginning to be used in Texas as a way to segregate classes and deny opportunity.
That expense still exists if you need to pay for huge highways serving sprawl with another funding mechanism. A massively increased gas tax would hit that $25k salary too.
Or now you want to massively subsidize those suburbs?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7409  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 3:00 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone View Post
The money also doesn't help keep the tolls open during Ice storms. The tolls also entrap much of Austin's less wealthy neighborhoods. Kind of like what IH-35 did to east Austin in the past. Also the tolls are owned by foreign companies so the money does not stay here to benefit the communities.
Toll roads in Austin include:

Loop 1 N tolls
183A
Mopac toll lanes
45N
45SW

They're about to build 183N and still pushing for S Mopac toll lanes.

None of those are in East Austin. Many are running to and through more affluent neighborhoods. The claim that tolls are trapping the poor doesn't hold up.


1 section of 130 is leased out. And it's not even the section that runs in Austin. The other roads are directly owned and operated by TxDot or CTRMA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7410  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 4:23 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,360
Dunno. Seems pretty east-biased to me.

__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7411  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 6:08 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echostatic View Post
Dunno. Seems pretty east-biased to me.

Now add 183N, 183A phase 3, and Mopac South.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7412  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2021, 7:00 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,360
Red: Tollway
Purple: Tolled Express Lanes
Dotted: Proposed or U/C

__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7413  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 5:10 AM
Enghum Enghum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
Not even close, CTRMA budgets are available online.

https://www.mobilityauthority.com/up...u%2021-004.pdf

(and of course, most of that "administrative costs" still exist for "free" highways. It's just in TxDot's $5B annual budget black hole).



So you'd prefer to instead not build the highway for decades while saving up enough money to build it? At which point construction costs have increased so much it costs as much as the interest payments would have been?

At current interest rates it would make no sense not to debt fund as much as you need. Even if you had cash on hand.



So you'd prefer the even greater suburban subsidy of gas taxes (taking money from miles driven on purely local urban roads not on highways) or general funds (taking money from those that don't even drive)?


The urban sections are also much more expensive to construct and maintain. The mopac toll lanes ended up being expensive enough. Just wait until they start (in 15-20 years or so) talking about expanding them again with depressed lanes like I35.



That expense still exists if you need to pay for huge highways serving sprawl with another funding mechanism. A massively increased gas tax would hit that $25k salary too.
Or now you want to massively subsidize those suburbs?
The CTRMA budget for the year has total toll/fee revenue at $119 million. This is a depressed value and will probably jump.

Bottom up approach toll costs listed
Total Processing and Collection Expense $6,291,000
Total Toll Operations Expense $6,538,900
Depreciation of Toll Equipment Dep Expense - Toll Equipment $4,000,000
Toll Consultants (I think you could justify some of the general consultants to add to this list too but I didn't)
GEC-Toll Ops Support $800,000
GEC-Technology Support $741,461
Traffic and Revenue Consultant $150,000

So total costs from a ~$119 million budget that are specific to supporting tolls is ~$18.5 million. That's without digging into any Salary and Benefits, Administrative costs (I grabbed some GEC from here for above), or communications.

Top down approach to costs give a total budget of $51 million of which only $7.2 million is spent on Operations and Maintenance
Total Roadway Operations and Maintenance $7,222,220

The true toll based costs is somewhere between the $18.5 million and $43.8 million.


I stand by my statement of 30% of toll revenue going towards toll processing and administrative support for tolls. I previously looked at this for NTTA which is a beast on a whole different level and that's where I got 30%. CTRMA may be closer to 20% to 30%. On $119 million in revenue there is $51 million for expenses and $42 million on top of that for just covering the accrued interest. Not a whole lot left over for principal payments. Obviously revenue will climb a bit back in when traffic is normal. The impending opening of the rest of 183 south will help on the revenue side as well. Still that debt is going to sit for a while.

As far as how to not to place a debt burden and still finance infrastructure projects in the long term I support raising taxes on corporations in and those earning more than $250,000 a year at the federal level. Short term tax increases may not be the best for right now so more debt. Stops this race to the bottom on taxes across the country without regressive things like gas or sales taxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7414  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 5:30 AM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 708
https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/de...ov_200_per.pdf

Just proves the point that these extremely expensive tollways segregate the poor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7415  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 7:40 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: there and back again
Posts: 57,324
It seems to be an Austin thing because I see toll roads in Houston in what are generally accepted as "upscale" areas or at least, decent neighborhoods. I really hate toll roads. We hardly use them and always look for a way to avoid them. I sort of question their effectiveness.
__________________
Donate to Donald Trump's campaign today!

Thou shall not indict
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7416  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 12:08 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverranchdrone View Post
https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/de...ov_200_per.pdf

Just proves the point that these extremely expensive tollways segregate the poor.
What does? All the toll roads on the rich side of town (see the ones I listed and the map)?

According to your map, we should also add the upper half of 130 as being in the non-poverty area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7417  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 1:37 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio / Austin
Posts: 2,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
It seems to be an Austin thing because I see toll roads in Houston in what are generally accepted as "upscale" areas or at least, decent neighborhoods. I really hate toll roads. We hardly use them and always look for a way to avoid them. I sort of question their effectiveness.
Totally. There is just something very wrong with how ours is set up. It's like "OK, you're priced out of Austin proper? Here, you have to live in this toll corridor where you've no choice but to pay if you want to get around".

....that's not even mentioning some of the lower income neighborhoods that already exist around them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7418  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 2:44 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enghum View Post

As far as how to not to place a debt burden and still finance infrastructure projects in the long term I support raising taxes on corporations in and those earning more than $250,000 a year at the federal level. Short term tax increases may not be the best for right now so more debt. Stops this race to the bottom on taxes across the country without regressive things like gas or sales taxes.
So you want _even more_ of a suburban subsidy than exists today? More sprawling highways completely disconnected from any concept of usage paying for them?

A removal of one of the few constraints on sprawl growth. Growth that we're already paying for in health and the environment, now you want us to spend even more general funds on it?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7419  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 4:31 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
What does? All the toll roads on the rich side of town (see the ones I listed and the map)?

According to your map, we should also add the upper half of 130 as being in the non-poverty area.
You mean the ones not built yet?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7420  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2021, 4:32 PM
Riverranchdrone Riverranchdrone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Austin
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
So you want _even more_ of a suburban subsidy than exists today? More sprawling highways completely disconnected from any concept of usage paying for them?

A removal of one of the few constraints on sprawl growth. Growth that we're already paying for in health and the environment, now you want us to spend even more general funds on it?
Pretty sure the toll roads caused the sprawling growth.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:22 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.